gbguy20
5 years ago
Plenty of people can do equal to or better the shit job that Darius is doing. I can name 10 guys currently on our roster I would rather have doing it
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Plenty of people can do equal to or better the shit job that Darius is doing. I can name 10 guys currently on our roster I would rather have doing it

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Yeah, I didn’t really agree with trading Davis. I wish we still had Cobb. He was smart & good.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
Davis sucked ass too
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Davis sucked ass too

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Guy had no support at all. Gets traded and suddenly it was a mistake to get something for him.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago
Hindsight is always 20/20. It’s easy now to second guess getting rid of Davis.
Now it looks like we should have kept Davis.
But it is what it is.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago
wouldn't it be fantastic is the biggest issue in GB was trying to figure out who was going to return punts?
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago
You can't keep everyone! If the Packers had to get rid of a WR when they were all healthy, I'm not disappoint they got rid of Davis, who like Janis, despite being a STs stud, didn't have a strong case to be resigned and he was going into a contract year.

So it was basically Allison, Davis or one of the udfas whom are in their first contract years and showing more potential than Davis did in his 3rd contract year on offense. I guess one could argue Kumerow too... but that seemed unlikely.

It's only now that a number of the WRs are injured, do we really wish we had Davis...

As far as the return game, if the offense and defense are going, all you really need to do is be smart and have no mistakes. And it's not like a great returner would have great blocking right now anyways... and some weeks it seems like about half the above average returns results in some sort of a flag pushing it back.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
Healthy or unhealthy team, Davis isn't wanted or needed.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Guy had no support at all. Gets traded and suddenly it was a mistake to get something for him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I supported him as a returner. He was decent at that. And this year he showed some promise at WR. I never did agree with trading him, so I didn’t “suddenly” say it was a mistake. I said it as soon as he was traded.

So he sucks for the last few years & we stick with him. Finally this year he shows some flashes of something good. And we kick him to the curb for a little bit of nothing. If nothing else, he’s a sure handed punt returner. That’s more valuable than you think. I don’t get it.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

I supported him as a returner. He was decent at that. And this year he showed some promise at WR. I never did agree with trading him, so I didn’t “suddenly” say it was a mistake. I said it as soon as he was traded.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



You were the only one then. And I agree, he seemed to have turn a corner this season, but he was not sure handed. I was excited to see what he could do in this offense. We can't keep 9 WR's or whatever it would have been. I was one of the jokers who thought it was better to keep Sheppard than Davis. It's looking like that was a mistake. I also think the Packers had to cut someone to bring up a TE and instead of cutting someone and getting nothing, they traded Davis for some late round pick.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (4h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (11h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.