Packers considering change at returner· Page 2

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

Plenty of people can do equal to or better the shit job that Darius is doing. I can name 10 guys currently on our roster I would rather have doing it

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#12

Plenty of people can do equal to or better the shit job that Darius is doing. I can name 10 guys currently on our roster I would rather have doing it

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Yeah, I didn’t really agree with trading Davis. I wish we still had Cobb. He was smart & good.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#13

Davis sucked ass too

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#14

Davis sucked ass too

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Guy had no support at all. Gets traded and suddenly it was a mistake to get something for him.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#15

Hindsight is always 20/20. It’s easy now to second guess getting rid of Davis.
Now it looks like we should have kept Davis.
But it is what it is.

wpr
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#16

wouldn't it be fantastic is the biggest issue in GB was trying to figure out who was going to return punts?

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#17

You can't keep everyone! If the Packers had to get rid of a WR when they were all healthy, I'm not disappoint they got rid of Davis, who like Janis, despite being a STs stud, didn't have a strong case to be resigned and he was going into a contract year.

So it was basically Allison, Davis or one of the udfas whom are in their first contract years and showing more potential than Davis did in his 3rd contract year on offense. I guess one could argue Kumerow too... but that seemed unlikely.

It's only now that a number of the WRs are injured, do we really wish we had Davis...

As far as the return game, if the offense and defense are going, all you really need to do is be smart and have no mistakes. And it's not like a great returner would have great blocking right now anyways... and some weeks it seems like about half the above average returns results in some sort of a flag pushing it back.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#18

Healthy or unhealthy team, Davis isn't wanted or needed.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#19

Guy had no support at all. Gets traded and suddenly it was a mistake to get something for him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I supported him as a returner. He was decent at that. And this year he showed some promise at WR. I never did agree with trading him, so I didn’t “suddenly” say it was a mistake. I said it as soon as he was traded.

So he sucks for the last few years & we stick with him. Finally this year he shows some flashes of something good. And we kick him to the curb for a little bit of nothing. If nothing else, he’s a sure handed punt returner. That’s more valuable than you think. I don’t get it.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

You were the only one then. And I agree, he seemed to have turn a corner this season, but he was not sure handed. I was excited to see what he could do in this offense. We can't keep 9 WR's or whatever it would have been. I was one of the jokers who thought it was better to keep Sheppard than Davis. It's looking like that was a mistake. I also think the Packers had to cut someone to bring up a TE and instead of cutting someone and getting nothing, they traded Davis for some late round pick.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (4h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (4h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (6h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (6h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (6h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (6h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (7h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (7h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (7h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (8h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (8h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (11h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (11h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (11h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (11h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (11h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (11h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (11h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (11h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (11h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (11h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (11h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (11h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (11h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS