dd80forever
15 years ago
With Chicago's signing of Cutler I would love to see Ted sign someone to kind of offset the hype and let everyone know the Packers are serious about contending within the division.

The more I think about it the Bears with Cutler is scary. They have got a guy to build a team around and with Forte building on his successful rookie season, the emergence of Olson, and the threat of Hester they have an Offense like they haven't had in a while. Cutler is so dangerous outside the pocket. Staying with Hester for an extended period of time is rough. There 2 safety valves are the best recievers on the team.

I think it's time to make a move. Let's not just try to improve from within while a team that was 3 games better than us last year just made a blockbuster move. The confidence is now in Chicago whether it is warranted or not. There are several FA's out there that could help the Packers. Pull off a trade if need be, but lets get some buzz going about GB.
blank
vegOmatic
15 years ago
Hype is not a reason to make a move.
blank
beast
15 years ago

With Chicago's signing of Cutler I would love to see Ted sign someone to kind of offset the hype and let everyone know the Packers are serious about contending within the division.

The more I think about it the Bears with Cutler is scary. They have got a guy to build a team around and with Forte building on his successful rookie season, the emergence of Olson, and the threat of Hester they have an Offense like they haven't had in a while. Cutler is so dangerous outside the pocket. Staying with Hester for an extended period of time is rough. There 2 safety valves are the best recievers on the team.

I think it's time to make a move. Let's not just try to improve from within while a team that was 3 games better than us last year just made a blockbuster move. The confidence is now in Chicago whether it is warranted or not. There are several FA's out there that could help the Packers. Pull off a trade if need be, but lets get some buzz going about GB.

"dd80forever" wrote:



It could be just be me but I don't think buzz is needed. If fact I kinda like it that isn't much easier to sneak up on teams.

Maybe it's because I've lived around a lot of Redskins fans for most of my life and every single year there seems to be hype buzz and hype about all the things they do in FA and they usually fail and fail big time.

Yeah yeah yeah the Bears got Cutler.... but what else to they got? They lost both their starting OTs.... also their RB lead the team in catches last year..... what good offense has had the RB with more catches?

Hester is quick and speedy.... still doesn't make him good enough to start for most teams in the NFL at WR and what other WR to they got? People say Hester a big time treat to score...... guess how many TDs he has..... the same number as S Nick Collins..... yes they have the same amount of TDs on the season with 3.

Basically the only weapons Cutler has are the RB and the TE. Now the TE is very good and he's gonna be hard to stop but I don't seem how Cutler makes as big an impact when he's losing the Denver running game, Brandon Marshal and the rest of those WRs (which Denver may have 3 WR better than Hester) and Denver's very very good OL and replaceing that with the Bears offense....... and only one draft pick in the top 3 and a half rounds.


I think Ted Thompson should add another vet on the DL but the Packers don't need a big move of any kind...... just maybe a good vet DL guy....... also if they do make a big move I want TE Tony Gonzalez..... the TEs last year were no where to be seen and I think a great TE could take the offense to a whole other level could a team cover Gonzalez, Jennings and Driver? Maybe even add in Jones or Nelson...... that would be extremely hard to cover.... and if Spitz beat out Wells for C and everyone healthy I see the inside of the OL taking a big step with Colledge, Spitz and Sitton because taking Wells out makes it a lot better at run blocking......
UserPostedImage
shield4life
15 years ago

With Chicago's signing of Cutler I would love to see Ted sign someone to kind of offset the hype and let everyone know the Packers are serious about contending within the division.

The more I think about it the Bears with Cutler is scary. They have got a guy to build a team around and with Forte building on his successful rookie season, the emergence of Olson, and the threat of Hester they have an Offense like they haven't had in a while. Cutler is so dangerous outside the pocket. Staying with Hester for an extended period of time is rough. There 2 safety valves are the best recievers on the team.

I think it's time to make a move. Let's not just try to improve from within while a team that was 3 games better than us last year just made a blockbuster move. The confidence is now in Chicago whether it is warranted or not. There are several FA's out there that could help the Packers. Pull off a trade if need be, but lets get some buzz going about GB.

"beast" wrote:



It could be just be me but I don't think buzz is needed. If fact I kinda like it that isn't much easier to sneak up on teams.

Maybe it's because I've lived around a lot of Redskins fans for most of my life and every single year there seems to be hype buzz and hype about all the things they do in FA and they usually fail and fail big time.

Yeah yeah yeah the Bears got Cutler.... but what else to they got? They lost both their starting OTs.... also their RB lead the team in catches last year..... what good offense has had the RB with more catches?

Hester is quick and speedy.... still doesn't make him good enough to start for most teams in the NFL at WR and what other WR to they got? People say Hester a big time treat to score...... guess how many TDs he has..... the same number as S Nick Collins..... yes they have the same amount of TDs on the season with 3.

Basically the only weapons Cutler has are the RB and the TE. Now the TE is very good and he's gonna be hard to stop but I don't seem how Cutler makes as big an impact when he's losing the Denver running game, Brandon Marshal and the rest of those WRs (which Denver may have 3 WR better than Hester) and Denver's very very good OL and replaceing that with the Bears offense....... and only one draft pick in the top 3 and a half rounds.


I think Ted Thompson should add another vet on the DL but the Packers don't need a big move of any kind...... just maybe a good vet DL guy....... also if they do make a big move I want TE Tony Gonzalez..... the TEs last year were no where to be seen and I think a great TE could take the offense to a whole other level could a team cover Gonzalez, Jennings and Driver? Maybe even add in Jones or Nelson...... that would be extremely hard to cover.... and if Spitz beat out Wells for C and everyone healthy I see the inside of the OL taking a big step with Colledge, Spitz and Sitton because taking Wells out makes it a lot better at run blocking......

"dd80forever" wrote:



Very well said, I agree :thumbright: .
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
The Bears have ruined Hester and that sucks. He was awesome to watch return kicks/punts against teams not named Green Bay Packers. He is not a WR and the more they try to use him that way the less effective he's going to be as a returner. They need to have him do one or the other. As for Hester being a WR, if you bump him hard at the line and don't let him get past you, he's nothing. If it wasn't that easy he'd have scored Randy Moss like TD's numbers last year. Yeah yeah, Orton couldn't throw the field and Cutler can, it won't make much difference if he can't get off the line again.

I do agree the Bears look more relevant now than they did a week ago. However, you don't make a move simply because someone else did. You make a move to make your team better. You compete against yourself to make yourself better.

And signing Kevin Carter and/or Vonnie Holiday makes us better. 🙂
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
With all the attention of last off-season... I am kind of enjoying a quiet Green Bay off-season this time around. Stealth shall win the war 🙂
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
bozz_2006
15 years ago
I know I'm going off-topic here, but in regards to beast's assertion that our TE's were non-existent last year, I don't think that has much to do with the over-all skills and talent of our TE's but rather is due to the fact that they had to stay in and block almost all of the time. they were virtually invisible because they were blocking, not running routes. it's gotta be hard to catch a lot of passes when you're asked to block.

I don't want Gonzalez. I'm interested in seeing improvement along our O-line and the development of Jermichael Finley. He's gonna be a stud if he ever grows up and realizes that if he wants to be a stud, he's going to have to work for it.
UserPostedImage
beast
15 years ago

I know I'm going off-topic here, but in regards to beast's assertion that our TE's were non-existent last year, I don't think that has much to do with the over-all skills and talent of our TE's but rather is due to the fact that they had to stay in and block almost all of the time. they were virtually invisible because they were blocking, not running routes. it's gotta be hard to catch a lot of passes when you're asked to block.

I don't want Gonzalez. I'm interested in seeing improvement along our O-line and the development of Jermichael Finley. He's gonna be a stud if he ever grows up and realizes that if he wants to be a stud, he's going to have to work for it.

"bozz_2006" wrote:




I don't disagree with what you said but the TEs weren't much of factor even when they did go out for passes. Also Gonzalez is a better blocker than any of the Packers TEs by FAR.

Also who better to teach Finley than Gonzalez? Yeah Finley has all the physical talent if he gets his mind in gear and used to the NFL, but who better teach him then the best TE in NFL history? Finley isn't going to respect anybody more than Gonzalez and Gonzalez is a great guy on and off the field.
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago
Making a move just to get noticed is the wrong way to approach things. I do think that GB needs to go out and get someone, but that appears to be a long shot.

I would go out and sign Vonnie Holiday and see what KC wants for Tony G. That's me though.

As far as the Bears goes. They have a lot of holes. Their receivers are awful. Devin Hester is a nice deep threat, but that's it. He's not going to catch 10 touchdowns on fly routes this season. The offensive line is starting a tackle who has injury problems and a tackle who is aging with injury problems. The pass rush is a concern. None of their pass rushers showed up last year. Anthony Adams played well with Tommie Harris last year, but they still need depth at DT. Secondary is poor actually. Nathan Vasher and Charles Tillman are actually on thin ice due to injuries and lack of production. Daniel Manning is a good player, but probably a safety. Mike Brown isn't the player he was.

My point is everyone is focusing in on the Bears, but top to bottom Green Bay and Minnesota are still better teams. Cutler elevates them and Lovie Smith is a great coach. Talent wise though, Chicago isn't this scary Super Bowl contender that everyone is trying to make them out to be. They're still pretty much a team with a franchise QB and has a lot of holes to fill. Much like the Packers actually.
dd80forever
15 years ago



My point is everyone is focusing in on the Bears, but top to bottom Green Bay and Minnesota are still better teams.

"porky88" wrote:




I strongly disagree. The Bears were 3 games better than us last year without Cutler. Saying the Pack is better is kind of stretching it here. All those holes you talk about were there last year and they were 9-7. Add Cutler to the team and they have to be the favorites in the NFC North.


I'm really looking for some logic behind your statement. The Packers have done nothing to improve, other than a new Def. Coordinator. If the Packers are going to improve so much from within I would assume it's safe to say so will the Bears. Now toss in Cutler to the equasion as well.


The point on making a move now wasn't to make one that wouldn't help the team just for the sake of making one, but rather speed up the process of signing someone assuming Ted was going to do so.


There are players out there that will improve this team. Ted's needs to quit fiddling around and make someone a priority sign. Or we can just sit still and watch the other teams pass us even further by.
blank
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (1h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (1h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Rude!
beast (5h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (11h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (13h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.