Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
I have heard that GB's new HC would be bringing a fresh offensive philosophy to the Packers. Yet I could not get a clear vision of this new system until now. I found this ESPN article that looked into the McVey/Shanahan offensive system that Coach LaFleur will be installing. I would not even consider placing this or any other article before this forum unless I felt that it was important.

http://www.espn.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/post/_/id/32694/inside-the-dynamic-plays-and-schemes-built-by-shanahan-and-mcvay 

I invite all to post your comments, opinions, thoughts, etc. Thank You .
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago
It's very nice to see the plan designs on paper, though those look like a lot of two routes, where I'm pretty sure they'll have some with more routes too.

But seems like they all have 2WRs, 1TE, 1RB and a flexible on the last position depending on the roster.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

It's very nice to see the plan designs on paper, though those look like a lot of two routes, where I'm pretty sure they'll have some with more routes too.

But seems like they all have 2WRs, 1TE, 1RB and a flexible on the last position depending on the roster.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing. 95% of the offensive plays will be run from the same set. This does not tip off the opposing defense and allows the QB to change the play, at the line, if he sees an advantage or because the play is doomed to fail. Seeing the same offensive set each time places a special advantage with the offense.
EX: The Bears have shown a tendency to drop into a certain pass coverage when a team has a 2nd and 6 to 8 yards to go when the ball is located between the 40 yard lines. Knowing this the offense can target the weakness in the expected defense without tipping off the play.

You will see the Rams run this system on Sunday against the Saints. The loss of slot receiver Cooper Kupp, while a bad thing, will be filled by another. It should also be remembered that the Rams Defense, being completely separate from the offense, must rely on a system of it's own. Therefor while both the Rams/Saints will field very good offenses, it will be the stronger play of Drew Brees that will edge the Saints past the Rams (IMO).

The point however is that GB's new offensive system will look very much like the Rams. The more observant among us will pay close attention with an eye as to how GB's players will look when this system is put in place there. Adjustments will naturally need to be made to take advantage of player skills and strengths.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 

Nope, you just misunderstood what I was trying to say...

But it's extremely ironic that you just talked down to me about overlooking the scheme, when just 9 hours ago you were complaining about us looking at potential FAs without knowing the scheme... so congratulations, you learned the scheme in 9 hours!

You know that or you were hypocritical complaining to me both ways...

While I agree that knowing who the FAs are is important, if you are unaware of the system that is looking to find FAs that will fit it is another. For GB I'm mainly referring to the new offensive system that HC LaFleur will be installing. It will place more emphasis in some areas and less in others. That said, the player personal will help to determine GB's new look as it is not based upon a rigid set of well known plays that are very predictable. The McVey/Shanahan derived system basically operates from the same formation sets, but is highly unpredictable as most of the plays start out looking the same until the play begins. Defenses can't read any tendencies from the offense that tip them off to what is coming their way.

I posted another thread that better explains LaFleur's offensive system, but only he and his offensive staff really know how/and with who they will remake GB's offense. The GB defense is a completely separate issue moving forward and FAs most likely will play an important role as Coach Pettine enters his second season with the team. I see need with an Edge Rusher, Safety, and Linebacker. Those weaknesses must also be high on the GM's list as well.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 


Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing. 95% of the offensive plays will be run from the same set. This does not tip off the opposing defense and allows the QB to change the play, at the line, if he sees an advantage or because the play is doomed to fail. Seeing the same offensive set each time places a special advantage with the offense.
EX: The Bears have shown a tendency to drop into a certain pass coverage when a team has a 2nd and 6 to 8 yards to go when the ball is located between the 40 yard lines. Knowing this the offense can target the weakness in the expected defense without tipping off the play.

You will see the Rams run this system on Sunday against the Saints. The loss of slot receiver Cooper Kupp, while a bad thing, will be filled by another. It should also be remembered that the Rams Defense, being completely separate from the offense, must rely on a system of it's own. Therefor while both the Rams/Saints will field very good offenses, it will be the stronger play of Drew Brees that will edge the Saints past the Rams (IMO).

The point however is that GB's new offensive system will look very much like the Rams. The more observant among us will pay close attention with an eye as to how GB's players will look when this system is put in place there. Adjustments will naturally need to be made to take advantage of player skills and strengths.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 





UserPostedImage
gbguy20
6 years ago
Whoa whoa beast. If you call Smokey a hypocrite he will leave the chat room as soon as you arrive. I don't know if you consider that a good thing or a bad thing but I figure you should be warned. I wish I would have learned that trick sooner.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
Me thinks there's a lot of personal views attacking going on around here lately.

Whatever happened to give you're opinion, agree or disagree with othet posters then moving on?
As far as Lefluers philosophy, I hope he comes out of training camp having everyone guessing what the offense and defense philosophoes are.

This is the time of misinformation!

Something else I hope this regime is as good or better than the last!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
beast
6 years ago

Whoa whoa beast. If you call Smokey a hypocrite he will leave the chat room as soon as you arrive. I don't know if you consider that a good thing or a bad thing but I figure you should be warned. I wish I would have learned that trick sooner.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



General I really like Smokey and his spirit... I just don't like it when I feel he is trying to talk down to me... such as

if you are unaware of the system

Perhaps you have overlooked


and we got some negative history over this and talking about scheme (3-4 DL thou but still).


I just found it silly that I basically tried to say what he said.... and he tried to correct me.

the player personal will help to determine GB's new look

These are Smokey's words, but it's the same as I was trying to say, Packers personal will help to determine the flexible position, if it's 3 WRs, 2 TEs or whatever they choose.

UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Boys, let's be nice.

I like the fact that we are trying to scheme guys open as receivers running fast, quick breaking routes.

I also hope that we change things up and not allow things to get stale.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
gbguy20
6 years ago
Thanks for the article.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
It is true that I did not understand about HC LaFleur's offensive philosophy, but then I found the ESPN article that explained it to me. Rather than keep it to myself, I decided that it was important enough to open this thread to share it. Knowledge afterall is the foundation of understanding. So how can one say just what players GB's offense should pursue without knowing about how it will operate.

Ex: LaFleur's offensive sys. will depend upon a TE/TEs that can block well. Jimmy Graham does not block well and may be traded to open up space for a TE/TEs that do block well (and catch too). My newly acquired understanding of GB's new offensive sys. has allowed me to feel confident about this.

Some forum members should learn the difference between debating an issue and a personal attack. Stating a point of view based on supporting evidence is the whole idea behind making a case for one's beliefs. Vulgar language, uncontrolled adolescent behavior, and trying to bully others is not why I enjoy this forum, so when it is displayed, I choose to not support it. Not displaying the post of known troublemakers is a first step to not allowing them to bother you with their juvenile remarks. Exiting a Chat room when they enter does not allow for the escalation of petty schoolyard postering. Others in the past have not learned how to act within a forums rules and some are not around anymore.

http://www.espn.com/blog/san-fr...lt-by-shanahan-and-mcvay 

Again, I strongly recommend reading this article. 😎

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Rude!
beast (3h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (7h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (9h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (11h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.