Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
I have heard that GB's new HC would be bringing a fresh offensive philosophy to the Packers. Yet I could not get a clear vision of this new system until now. I found this ESPN article that looked into the McVey/Shanahan offensive system that Coach LaFleur will be installing. I would not even consider placing this or any other article before this forum unless I felt that it was important.

http://www.espn.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/post/_/id/32694/inside-the-dynamic-plays-and-schemes-built-by-shanahan-and-mcvay 

I invite all to post your comments, opinions, thoughts, etc. Thank You .
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago
It's very nice to see the plan designs on paper, though those look like a lot of two routes, where I'm pretty sure they'll have some with more routes too.

But seems like they all have 2WRs, 1TE, 1RB and a flexible on the last position depending on the roster.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

It's very nice to see the plan designs on paper, though those look like a lot of two routes, where I'm pretty sure they'll have some with more routes too.

But seems like they all have 2WRs, 1TE, 1RB and a flexible on the last position depending on the roster.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing. 95% of the offensive plays will be run from the same set. This does not tip off the opposing defense and allows the QB to change the play, at the line, if he sees an advantage or because the play is doomed to fail. Seeing the same offensive set each time places a special advantage with the offense.
EX: The Bears have shown a tendency to drop into a certain pass coverage when a team has a 2nd and 6 to 8 yards to go when the ball is located between the 40 yard lines. Knowing this the offense can target the weakness in the expected defense without tipping off the play.

You will see the Rams run this system on Sunday against the Saints. The loss of slot receiver Cooper Kupp, while a bad thing, will be filled by another. It should also be remembered that the Rams Defense, being completely separate from the offense, must rely on a system of it's own. Therefor while both the Rams/Saints will field very good offenses, it will be the stronger play of Drew Brees that will edge the Saints past the Rams (IMO).

The point however is that GB's new offensive system will look very much like the Rams. The more observant among us will pay close attention with an eye as to how GB's players will look when this system is put in place there. Adjustments will naturally need to be made to take advantage of player skills and strengths.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 

Nope, you just misunderstood what I was trying to say...

But it's extremely ironic that you just talked down to me about overlooking the scheme, when just 9 hours ago you were complaining about us looking at potential FAs without knowing the scheme... so congratulations, you learned the scheme in 9 hours!

You know that or you were hypocritical complaining to me both ways...

While I agree that knowing who the FAs are is important, if you are unaware of the system that is looking to find FAs that will fit it is another. For GB I'm mainly referring to the new offensive system that HC LaFleur will be installing. It will place more emphasis in some areas and less in others. That said, the player personal will help to determine GB's new look as it is not based upon a rigid set of well known plays that are very predictable. The McVey/Shanahan derived system basically operates from the same formation sets, but is highly unpredictable as most of the plays start out looking the same until the play begins. Defenses can't read any tendencies from the offense that tip them off to what is coming their way.

I posted another thread that better explains LaFleur's offensive system, but only he and his offensive staff really know how/and with who they will remake GB's offense. The GB defense is a completely separate issue moving forward and FAs most likely will play an important role as Coach Pettine enters his second season with the team. I see need with an Edge Rusher, Safety, and Linebacker. Those weaknesses must also be high on the GM's list as well.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 


Perhaps you have overlooked the core principle of the new system that LaFleur will be implementing. 95% of the offensive plays will be run from the same set. This does not tip off the opposing defense and allows the QB to change the play, at the line, if he sees an advantage or because the play is doomed to fail. Seeing the same offensive set each time places a special advantage with the offense.
EX: The Bears have shown a tendency to drop into a certain pass coverage when a team has a 2nd and 6 to 8 yards to go when the ball is located between the 40 yard lines. Knowing this the offense can target the weakness in the expected defense without tipping off the play.

You will see the Rams run this system on Sunday against the Saints. The loss of slot receiver Cooper Kupp, while a bad thing, will be filled by another. It should also be remembered that the Rams Defense, being completely separate from the offense, must rely on a system of it's own. Therefor while both the Rams/Saints will field very good offenses, it will be the stronger play of Drew Brees that will edge the Saints past the Rams (IMO).

The point however is that GB's new offensive system will look very much like the Rams. The more observant among us will pay close attention with an eye as to how GB's players will look when this system is put in place there. Adjustments will naturally need to be made to take advantage of player skills and strengths.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 





UserPostedImage
gbguy20
6 years ago
Whoa whoa beast. If you call Smokey a hypocrite he will leave the chat room as soon as you arrive. I don't know if you consider that a good thing or a bad thing but I figure you should be warned. I wish I would have learned that trick sooner.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
Me thinks there's a lot of personal views attacking going on around here lately.

Whatever happened to give you're opinion, agree or disagree with othet posters then moving on?
As far as Lefluers philosophy, I hope he comes out of training camp having everyone guessing what the offense and defense philosophoes are.

This is the time of misinformation!

Something else I hope this regime is as good or better than the last!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
beast
6 years ago

Whoa whoa beast. If you call Smokey a hypocrite he will leave the chat room as soon as you arrive. I don't know if you consider that a good thing or a bad thing but I figure you should be warned. I wish I would have learned that trick sooner.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



General I really like Smokey and his spirit... I just don't like it when I feel he is trying to talk down to me... such as

if you are unaware of the system

Perhaps you have overlooked


and we got some negative history over this and talking about scheme (3-4 DL thou but still).


I just found it silly that I basically tried to say what he said.... and he tried to correct me.

the player personal will help to determine GB's new look

These are Smokey's words, but it's the same as I was trying to say, Packers personal will help to determine the flexible position, if it's 3 WRs, 2 TEs or whatever they choose.

UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Boys, let's be nice.

I like the fact that we are trying to scheme guys open as receivers running fast, quick breaking routes.

I also hope that we change things up and not allow things to get stale.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
gbguy20
6 years ago
Thanks for the article.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Smokey
  • Smokey
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
It is true that I did not understand about HC LaFleur's offensive philosophy, but then I found the ESPN article that explained it to me. Rather than keep it to myself, I decided that it was important enough to open this thread to share it. Knowledge afterall is the foundation of understanding. So how can one say just what players GB's offense should pursue without knowing about how it will operate.

Ex: LaFleur's offensive sys. will depend upon a TE/TEs that can block well. Jimmy Graham does not block well and may be traded to open up space for a TE/TEs that do block well (and catch too). My newly acquired understanding of GB's new offensive sys. has allowed me to feel confident about this.

Some forum members should learn the difference between debating an issue and a personal attack. Stating a point of view based on supporting evidence is the whole idea behind making a case for one's beliefs. Vulgar language, uncontrolled adolescent behavior, and trying to bully others is not why I enjoy this forum, so when it is displayed, I choose to not support it. Not displaying the post of known troublemakers is a first step to not allowing them to bother you with their juvenile remarks. Exiting a Chat room when they enter does not allow for the escalation of petty schoolyard postering. Others in the past have not learned how to act within a forums rules and some are not around anymore.

http://www.espn.com/blog/san-fr...lt-by-shanahan-and-mcvay 

Again, I strongly recommend reading this article. 😎

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (11m) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (4h) : meh
Zero2Cool (8h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (8h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (8h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (12h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (12h) : Only 4
wpr (12h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (14h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (15h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.