Packers To Hire Nathaniel Hackett As OC· Page 2

Dulak
Veteran Member

5 years ago

ok Im with the few others here as Zero put "we screwed" - the guys resume looks errr like crap. So oh wow he was the OC of the jags that got fired and the jags really sucked it up this year; What they thought they might win the SB last year and this year couldnt even make the playoffs? ... blake bortles blows btw probably worse then our gum chewing dude thats gone.

i would of liked it better if we would of kept philbin as the OC ...

thats my pessimisim for the day errr and my spelling mistake

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: Dulak

Good analysis thank you for your time

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Smokey
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#13

Sometimes good people get caught up in bad situations. Nathaniel Hackett would never be offered GB's OC if he sucked. The personal/atmosphere in Jacksonville, as I've heard, is not good. Hackett will help with the game plans, but he will not be calling the plays during the games.

Also, we don't yet know what the new team chemistry will be like. All that I know is that professionals are evaluating and hiring GB's new personal and they should know better than some reporter or poster on a forum site.

Let us give all a clean slate to start with. I'm sure that some would like to move on from their past and focus on the future. Good expectations moving forward is better than placing negative baggage into the mix.

Good luck to GB's new HC and OC and to whomever is hired as the STs Coach. In addition, I wish GB's DC and the entire GB Coaching Staff and GB's Management all the best.

GoPackGo

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: Dulak

The one thing that we can say about Hackett is he did lead an offense that put up 45 points (for sake of accuracy, it should be noted some of those points could have came from special teams or defense) in the playoffs on the Steelers and his offense was only 4 points from tying the Patriots in the AFC Championship.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#15

ok Im with the few others here as Zero put "we screwed" - the guys resume looks errr like crap. So oh wow he was the OC of the jags that got fired and the jags really sucked it up this year; What they thought they might win the SB last year and this year couldnt even make the playoffs? ... blake bortles blows btw probably worse then our gum chewing dude thats gone.

i would of liked it better if we would of kept philbin as the OC ...

thats my pessimisim for the day errr and my spelling mistake

Originally Posted by: Dulak

This kind of goes against the whole “clean house” idea. Our offense sucked last year, I think we need all new people to come in & give the Packers a revamp. I like & respect Philbin, but I feel like he would have to change his philosophy all together if he were to have stayed. Basically I would’ve seen it as hiring a new offensive head coach, but keeping one of McCarthy’s offensive minds on the team as well.

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#16

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Also both the Jaguars and Titans both put up 30+ points on the Patriots this year despite having generally sucky offenses and questionable QBs. Though you could say the Patriots got them earlier years in the post-season.

And the Titans went 4-1 against opponents the Packers are scheduled to face in 2019. 4-0 against the NFC East (which had two in the playoffs and had a pretty good Redskins team until they started losing QBs) and and one point loss to the Chargers who went 13-3.

Also for Hackett and the 2017 Jaguars, in week 3, they put up 44 points on the dreaded Ravens defense... the second highest score the Ravens gave up on the first 13 weeks was 27 points. (In the last 4 weeks the Ravens defense struggled more and gave up 39 and 31 to the Steelers and Bengals).

Also for Hackett, part of his sccuess was using one run blocking TE Marcedes Lewis to the best of his abilities... getting the most out of him (Lewis is currently a FA).

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

5 years ago

#17

Insight/Potential fluff (currently unemployed former position coach for the Jags)

[TWITTER]1084974333955584001?s=19[/TWITTER]

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (9h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (13h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (13h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (13h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (16h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (16h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (16h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (16h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (16h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (16h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (16h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (16h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (18h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (18h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (18h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (19h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (19h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (20h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (21h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (21h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (22h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (22h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (22h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (22h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (22h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (22h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (22h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (22h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (22h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (22h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (22h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS