Josh McDaniels ought to have alot of trust in his ability to develop a QB though. Or at least, get one going in their system.

If he thinks he can rely on Orton for a while, they might just go with Freeman at 18, or if they doubt he'll be there at 18, maybe even at 12 (Although that would be quite a reach). In that case, they wouldn't need us and they'd still get quite a playmaker.

1 Detroit Lions
2 St. Louis Rams
3 Kansas City Chiefs
4 Seattle Seahawks
5 Cleveland Browns
6 Cincinnati Bengals
7 Oakland Raiders
8 Jacksonville Jaguars
9 Green Bay Packers
10 San Francisco 49ers
11 Buffalo Bills
12 Denver Broncos
13 Washington Redskins
14 New Orleans Saints
15 Houston Texans
16 San Diego Chargers
17 New York Jets
18 Denver Broncos (from Chicago)
19 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
20 Detroit Lions (from Dallas)
21 Philadelphia Eagles
22 Minnesota Vikings
23 New England Patriots
24 Atlanta Falcons
25 Miami Dolphins
26 Baltimore Ravens
27 Indianapolis Colts
28 Philadelphia Eagles (from Carolina)
29 New York Giants
30 Tennessee Titans
31 Arizona Cardinals
32 Pittsburgh Steelers

33 Detroit Lions
34 New England Patriots (from Kansas City)
35 St. Louis Rams
36 Cleveland Browns
37 Seattle Seahawks
38 Cincinnati Bengals
39 Jacksonville Jaguars
40 Oakland Raiders
41 Green Bay Packers
42 Buffalo Bills
43 San Francisco 49ers
44 Miami Dolphins (from Washington)
45 New York Giants (from New Orleans)
46 Houston Texans
47 New England Patriots (from San Diego)
48 Denver Broncos
49 Chicago Bears
50 Cleveland Browns (from Tampa Bay)
51 Dallas Cowboys
52 New York Jets
53 Philadelphia Eagles
54 Minnesota Vikings
55 Atlanta Falcons
56 Miami Dolphins
57 Baltimore Ravens
58 New England Patriots
59 Carolina Panthers
60 New York Giants
61 Indianapolis Colts
62 Tennessee Titans
63 Arizona Cardinals
64 Pittsburgh Steelers

65 Detroit Lions
66 St. Louis Rams
67 Kansas City Chiefs
68 Seattle Seahawks
69 Dallas Cowboys (from Cleveland)
70 Cincinnati Bengals
71 Oakland Raiders
72 Jacksonville Jaguars
73 Green Bay Packers
74 San Francisco 49ers
75 Buffalo Bills
76 New York Jets (from New Orleans)
77 Houston Texans
78 San Diego Chargers
79 Denver Broncos
80 Washington Redskins
81 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
82 Detroit Lions (from Dallas)
83 Green Bay Packers (from Jets)
84 Denver Broncos (from Chicago)
85 Philadelphia Eagles
86 Minnesota Vikings
87 Miami Dolphins
88 Baltimore Ravens
89 New England Patriots
90 Atlanta Falcons
91 New York Giants
92 Indianapolis Colts
93 Carolina Panthers
94 Tennessee Titans
95 Arizona Cardinals
96 Pittsburgh Steelers
97 New England Patriots *
98 Cincinnati Bengals *
99 Chicago Bears *
100 New York Giants *

* = Compensatory selection

Thank you rock and dfoster.

---

I'd take their 12 and 18 for our 9 in a heart beat. :)


I'd even take their 12 and 48 for our 9 pick.

---

Poor little Slickster stuck behind a firewall.. :lol:

---

Stupid ass Websense. I hate it! lol

---

Pick #9 is worth 1350.

12 and 18 would be 2100. There is no way.

We could maybe, maybe hope to get a mid first and a first next year, but even that seems unlikely. A more likely trade if we are assuming its Denver is their 12 (1200) and their 44 (460). If we are SURE our guy will still be there, Im ok with it.

Chances are teams arent going to go "crazy" to trade up, and given our situation, I want to sit at 9, and take a player there.

---

I definitely like where the Packers are positioned in this draft...and I do anticipate a team wanting to move up if Sanchez, or one of the OTs fall.

---

Please, the points system is out dated and everyone knows this already.

I will agree the 12 and 18 is too much for JUST the 9. It would take the 9 and 41 and that would be pushing it.

The more likely switch would be their 18 and 48 for our 9.

---

Yeah. People who fail drug tests aren't exactly "Packer people."

Now if his arm was about to fall off, we'd draft him with a 1st round pick.

---