I’m happy to see him making progress. However, he isn’t Khalil Mack. Mack is the type of player that you game plan against, the type of player that is always in the QB’s head making him wonder when he’s going to get to him. He makes that internal clock for the QB a little bit shorter.

Fackrell isn’t that type of player (yet, hopefully).

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

Did I hear on the post-game show that Fackrell is now TIED FOR THE NFL SACK LEADER with Khalil Mack!?

Granted, we've played one more game (have the Bares had their bye week yet? Maybe the Thursday night game is offset by the bye.) But still man. Fack hasn't cost us 2 firsts and $100 million.

Hope Fackrell remains consistent like this. His hustle is paying off.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

so many wrongs here lol. He played vs the weakest O line in the league and no, he isnt leading the league in sacks nor is Mack. That would be Aaron Donald with 12.5 sacks. Fack is tied with 4 other players at #9.

Fack also doesnt get the attention or pressure that Mack does. The only thing the two have in common is their names rhymes. Can please stop with the comparisons? makes us look like clueless viking fans

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 

Why is it anytime a Packer player, or the team itself had a good game you have to make excuses for their success?

The Packers are not where anyone wanted them to be, but there have been some accomplishments made by some.

Who's to say Fackrell wont keep up his sack pace?

Not much to be happy about, but Fackrell and a few others are showing growth.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan