Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
The problem is if the free safety is always deep cover then depending on where he lines up you know where there’s going to be help. Both safeties have to be able to help out corners deep. Whether they do so we’re not in the assigned scheme for the play is another matter
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
6 years ago

Perhaps I am too old school, but it doesn’t seem to me that it should be that hard to play either/both safety position(s).

I mean, are these guys pigeonholed that tightly… seriously?

Originally Posted by: KRK 


It all depends on system and talent... you're correct that in theory if they're that talented then it doesn't matter... but where your old school thought loses out is that they're not making Safeties like they used to. I don't think I could find it but 5 years ago there was this GREAT article which basically broke it down that the college (and highschool) spread systems are killing the talent and development at the Safety position.


The old school way was there was 2 WRs, 2 CBs and 2 S... and the natural progression of trying out talented guys (still) goes start at WR ... if they didn't make it there, more to CB, and if they didn't make it there more to S. And there was more talent than there were positions, so talented guys (like Ed Reed, Troy Polamalu, LeRoy Butler etc) would get spread out to the Safety position.

Now with the spread systems there got 4 WRs, 4 CBs and 2 S... and with the natural progression of WR, CB then S.... less talent is getting to the Safety positions (so yes it might be more pigeonholed or specialized at the Safety position now). So there is less talent getting to the Safety position and superstar FS.... and even Nick Collins was a CB in college.

But the 'pigeonholed' or specialization, is more about can you play CB or LB? Because in todays football sometimes a Safety needs to be able to cover a WR one on one, or charge up and basically play LB against a big physical RB. I call Reid a SS because I don't think he could cover a WR one on one that well and because he has literally play 4-3 LB when injuries killed the LB core. I called Vaccaro a FS because he has covered WR well in one on one (mainly the slot) but has also down field.


The spread system is also killing Safety development in another way... according to former Safeties, it's supposedly extremely easy to mentally read to the spread system, it's more about physically reacting to it... but get in the pros and they're using less spread and more pro-style and there is supposedly so more more to mentally read that mentally guys are struggling more especially since the NFL has more complex systems and smarter QBs and the safeties are mentally further behind than where Safety rookies 10-20 years ago would of been starting.

UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

I believe the biggest difference is speed. FS has a lot of deep field to cover, where a SS plays closer to the line.

Originally Posted by: hardrocker950 

Yes, but not pure speed (like 40 time alone)... it's about mental quickness to read what's happening and physical reaction quickness... but yes speed does play into that as well.

Also it depends on what system you're using... like I believe in Pettine's system they really need two FS as Pettine likes to go high risk and leaving the coverage in one on one man coverage... and below part as well.

The problem is if the free safety is always deep cover then depending on where he lines up you know where there’s going to be help. Both safeties have to be able to help out corners deep. Whether they do so we’re not in the assigned scheme for the play is another matter

Originally Posted by: KRK 


Your right, and as Pettine mentions the offense can somewhat dictate which Safety is gonna be the FS ... so you need two just in case. And I wonder if that's why they're keeping Josh Jones at Safety hoping someday he'll develop that FS skill... as he has the physical talent... just need to work on mental and maybe foot quickness.


UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
OK then, who on the roster is currently capable to play free safety? If we have to have two, and we knew with Pettine scheme we were going to have two, then we either should have them on our roster, acquire them for our roster, or be able to quickly develop them from our roster.

Do we have a disconnect between front office and coaching staff?
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
6 years ago

OK then, who on the roster is currently capable to play free safety? If we have to have two, and we knew with Pettine scheme we were going to have two, then we either should have them on our roster, acquire them for our roster, or be able to quickly develop them from our roster.

Do we have a disconnect between front office and coaching staff?

Originally Posted by: KRK 



lol it's been less than half a season man lol...

the world isn't perfect and that doesn't mean their is a disconnect... the team had a lot of holes to fill, and just because every single one isn't filled doesn't mean the sky is falling. Personally, if you told me in February that we would lose Randall, Rollins, Nelson, Ryan and wouldn't be complaining too much about CB, WR or ILB... I wouldn't of believed you!

A lot of good has been done... I can't tell you what the Packers were thinking... but I'm thinking/guessing they were hoping one of these young Safeties would step up... especially between Brice and Jones.... and so far it's Whitehead who has stepped up! Though the coaches still seem to think Brice is better.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

OK then, who on the roster is currently capable to play free safety? If we have to have two, and we knew with Pettine scheme we were going to have two, then we either should have them on our roster, acquire them for our roster, or be able to quickly develop them from our roster.

Do we have a disconnect between front office and coaching staff?

Originally Posted by: KRK 



Tramon Williams, Raven Greene, Breeland, House might be better at S, did they IR him?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
6 years ago
PFF ranked teams pass coverage so far... and the Packers ranked 6th overall (good news)

Of course, we're about to face two of the top three teams in back to back weeks (so could be very bad)


6. Green Bay Packers

TEAM COVERAGE GRADE: 80.5

Forced Incompletion %: 8.2 (27th)

Team Passer Rating Allowed%: 100.5 (16th)

Top Coverage Defender (Coverage Grade): LB Blake Martinez (86.8)

ProFootballFocus  wrote:


UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
nerd and beast...ty...I appreciate your oponions/observations
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (44m) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (58m) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (4h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (4h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (4h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (4h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (4h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (4h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (4h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (5h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (6h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (6h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (8h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (17h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (23h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.