Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

I wonder if I would get chewed out by anyone for saying I think Nick Barnett is overrated....at his current position.

But I do think he would be better in another position.

"AKamp74" wrote:



Not by me.. Above average in pursuit and coverage, but in the box the guy is a liability in getting off blocks.. Not real stout at the point of attack.

In the 4-3 he should have been a WIL to take advantage of his speed and quickness.. I have a hard time projecting him successful in the 3-4.

Not stout enough inside and has little in terms of pass rushing moves..

Shall be interesting where he fits.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
longtimefan
15 years ago

I wonder if I would get chewed out by anyone for saying I think Nick Barnett is overrated....at his current position.

But I do think he would be better in another position.

"pack93z" wrote:



Not by me.. Above average in pursuit and coverage, but in the box the guy is a liability in getting off blocks.. Not real stout at the point of attack.

In the 4-3 he should have been a WIL to take advantage of his speed and quickness.. I have a hard time projecting him successful in the 3-4.

Not stout enough inside and has little in terms of pass rushing moves..

Shall be interesting where he fits.

"AKamp74" wrote:



The bench just might fit him
warhawk
15 years ago

Well, I may become a Ted Thompson hater if we have another 6-10 season. However, love Aaron Rodgers. He's going to be a winner, if Mike McCarthy will stop making Aaron Rodgers play with one hand tied behind his back.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I think your putting a little more on McCarthy than he deserves or may I say not looking at the full body of work here. Mac has been tutoring Arod for three years now so some of what we all saw last year came from that.

It's also McCarthy that is responsible for game planning and putting his QB in the best position possible based on what he will be seeing on the other side of the LOS. I think he did an excellent job there.

Whereas Mac may have gotten a little conservative at the end of games he was working with Arod as a starter for the first year so the amount he could comfortably put on him was a little more questionable than it would have been with a Brett Favre who was not only a veteran starter but they knew each other better.

Could he have been more aggressive? Sure, but it's not just that easy either. Your winning a game in the middle of the 4th quarter and aggressively trying to turn it into a two score advantage. That's great in theory but bad things can happen when you do that as well.

I don't think Mike McCarthy is gun shy by nature and I think we will see him open up a little more this year with Arod having last year under his belt. I will say though that I don't hardly ever see any team get too awful aggressive with the ball and take risks with a mid fourth quarter lead.
"The train is leaving the station."
porky88
15 years ago
Couple of comments I have.

I said Brandon Jackson should see more carries not start. I think that would be better for Ryan Grant too. McCarthy seems to rely on Grant way to much at times, like he's an Adrian Peterson type of player and that he's not. Grant is capable of being a solid back and Jackson is capable of being a really good No. 2. McCarthy acts like all he has is Grant.

I think Ted was spot on in giving Rodgers a new deal. If he didn't, Green Bay would be sitting with Rodgers, Jennings, Kampman, and Collins as free agents next year. That's a lot for one year. Not to mention a couple of low level starters like Jason Spitz and Johnny Jolly as well.

Thompson gave Rodgers money because he is this teams franchise QB going forward. Whether that ends up being a good thing is, yes an unknown, but that's what it is right now. Like I said before it's not much different in giving the No. 9 pick a lot of money which will be the case. If GB takes Everette Brown, he'll probably make more than Aaron Kampman. Rodgers making a lot of money at the most important position really makes sense.
15 years ago

Just to be sure it doesn't appear that I'm jumping on DHazer, I'm not dead-convinced that Rodgers is some perennial pro-bowler or anything, yet. I do agree that you can't make that kind of determination after a single season, even if it was a very promising season. Where I differ is that I don't have any preconceived bias against the kid - I don't hate him because he's not Favre or because I think he's "Ted Thompson's kid". I don't hate him at all - nor do I love him.

He's got plenty to prove; I'm just willing to allow him to try to prove it.

"pack93z" wrote:



Spot on.. that is the approach all Packer fans should have towards Rodgers at this moment.

But I think Ted was a little trigger happy on the timing of his extension.. I know he was playing the cap game, but wee bit risky.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Wait wait... I agree that that is a completely valid way of looking at Rodgers, but why can't fans "love" him if they so choose? He's a cool customer, he already pulled some crazy plays out of his ass in his first starting season, and he had a great year after putting up with an incredible amount of shit from Packers fans and their kids. Plus, being a fan is supposed to be fun! Do I HAVE to be objective all the time? :)

I don't think the people who want Thompson/Rodgers gone would be happy even if they were gone. They would just wait until the next regime came in and bitch about them in between watching their home recordings of Favre games and reminiscing about "the past". It would be the Ice Bowl generation all over again. Dear lord what a scary thought. More people going to the Packers HOF than the game. Turrible. Just turrible.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago
For those that want to bash Ted and Rodgers in ever post go here


fan4ever.com/forum


rumor has it this is the latest topic there

perfect fit for Brett? An OWNER/PLAYER. Kinda like Michael Jordan was. Build a team around him, including the young guy he wants to step up should he find he can't go the whole year. I like Li'l Brett Ratlif of the Jets or someone like Flynn of the Packers. Hand-pick the coach. I would suggest Doug Pederson with a killer WCO.



that is just so efffing ridiculous it makes me ashamed to have even been a part of that forum
Stevetarded
15 years ago

Saying Jackson should be starter over Grant because of his yards per carry would be like saying that Rodgers should be MVP after no picks through a few games.

The more carries you get, the less your average is. Some run plays are set up to be jus 2 - 3 yard pops and of course some are there to break it the distance. It's backs who make the 2 - 3 yard pops into 12 yard plus gains that are special. (i.e. Barry Sanders)

"SlickVision" wrote:



Marion Barber
Brandon Jacobs
Brian Westbrook
Michael Turner
Willie Parker
Jamal Lewis
LaDainian Tomlinson
Justin Fargas
Larry Johnson
Thomas Jones
Marshawn Lynch

All of these guys had a lower average than their backups. It isn't that uncommon when you have a guy going in halfway through the game with fresh legs to have a better average.
blank
Dulak
15 years ago
rodgers ... here is my take on rodgers ...

ok he did good for his 1st year starting; ya I miss brett and sad hes gone.

But at least our QB can throw and he's pretty good. Would I rather have some p.o.s. QB that cant throw and throws lots of INT?

Either way our QB is in the top 10 of all QBs atm and somethink much higher. Might as well keep him and develope him; seems like a good guy too.

We have great WRs and decent TEs - put a decent QB to match with them and we got a winning football team ... cough well as long as we got a decent D.
dhazer
15 years ago
1st off how can anyone not say Rodgers isn't over rated? Like i stated before and have seen since people have him being the franchise qb for years to come and he played one season. I see someone brought up how he had so much to prove last year to the fans, while the question i ask now is will he still have that same hunger in him? He has alot of people worshiping him and calling him great so he won over alot of fans so there goes that motivation. Playing out his final year for a contract nope thats gone now also he had the big payday already. So whats left to motivate him, maybe the comeback thing but then again as alot have said on here thats not on him so please advise me to what motivation he has left? I really don't hate Rodgers but i'm sorry i will not hop on the bandwagon yet. I wasn't on Brett's bandwagon right away either i'll admit that after all we had Magik but after a few winning seasons that changed so maybe after a few winning seasons and that feeling of the Packers as a good to great team comes back i might join the bandwagon.


Why isn't anyone bringing up Ted Thompson as over rated?


BTW Trippster i'm doing my interview in a few minutes.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
Probably because Ted Thompson isn't a player and the thread title explicitly says "PLAYER". Just a thought.

Re. Aaron Rodgers: He outperformed expectations last year (did anyone predict 32 total TD's, 4,000 yards and top 5 in most QB categories?). He was underrated going into 2008.
How can anyone not say he isn't overrated? Good question. I completely agree with the implied statement.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (9m) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (16m) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (3h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (3h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (4h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (4h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (4h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (5h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (5h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (7h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (16h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (22h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (23h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.