How to handle sacking QB

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Here we see Clay doesn't have a reputation of getting these kind of flags.

The Problem? The NFL wants its QB's to last forever because they have neutered the effectiveness of defenses by the massive molestation of the rule book. (FUCK YOU!)

The Solution? Immediately, NFL teams need to start focusing on stripping the ball from QB's instead of sacking them. Do everything you can to smash the shit out of the hand/arm that has the ball. I think this means more corner blitz's with players who are more agile and fast. The other option is to load up with 6 DB's every damn snap and cover until the cows come home.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

KRK
Veteran Member

6 years ago

z, I don’t know if you were serious with your proposed solution, but I really like it. The only problem is, 15 minutes after people start going for the strip, they will say it is illegal to chop a quarterbacks arm.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Originally Posted by: KRK

Very serious. What's the point in hitting the QB anymore? It brings upon negative results. Look at Mike Daniels play, he had a easy sack, pulled up to not get flag. We saw this same thing happen last week with another team too. So I say screw sacking the QB and divert your attention, 100% to smashing the QB's arm to dislodge that ball. If you hit that arm hard enough, that bastard won't be able to throw as well. It's win-win ... until the change the rule again.

Adapt and succeed.

Porforis
Veteran Member

6 years ago

It's 2018. We have the technology to have sensors on the QB that detects when he's going to the ground, and deploy in-uniform airbags.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

6 years ago

I agree Zero, you can’t sack the QB anymore without being worried if there’s some yellow laundry laying next to you on the field.

It's 2018. We have the technology to have sensors on the QB that detects when he's going to the ground, and deploy in-uniform airbags.

Originally Posted by: Porforis

This is one of the better (funnier) solutions that I have seen 😂

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

6 years ago

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

Let's just do the in the grasp rule. You want to keep them safe? Make it so the QB is no longer allowed to break tackles. Once they are grabbed they are down. No need to take them to the ground. Shitty, but I'd rather do this if they're going to call a penalty every time we get to them anyway. Or just revert the rule book to 1999 and make everyone sign a no-lawsuit clause or fuck off.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Dulak
Veteran Member

6 years ago

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

I keep thinking they need 2 hand touch rules as when you played when you were a kid ... start with the QB and Ill bet soon it goes to other players. Then they will soon take off the pads, and eventually wear too toos.

- on a side note - After the CM3 penalty I just couldnt watch anymore. I saw that ref getting all high and mighty throwing the flag. Just getting old ...

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

6 years ago

If the officials had enforced the "in-the-grasp" rule as written, the Helmet Catch never would have happened and the Patriots would have won Super Bowl XLII.

Try that one on for size. 💤

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#10

Bring surprise, Colin steals my idea.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (8h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (15h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (16h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (16h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (16h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (17h) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24