Zero2Cool
6 years ago
This is a neat little chart. (move this to football familiarity section at a later date)

Does this chart add clarity of where the ball should be thrown for you?

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago
It's a nice chart but it is a little simplistic. It assumes the receiver is on a crossing pattern. On a post the target areas are all there but where is the defender? You can't throw the ball to the receivers chest if the defender is between the receiver and the QB. And what of the back shoulder pass? Sometimes the best pass is one that is short. The receiver knowing this can pull up and let the defender take himself out of the play. The passes by the sidelines where the ball needs to be in the "High" and also "In front" zone. Then there are the passes that are intentionally low allowing the receiver to get down and avoid contact.

The QB can make the perfect pass but not be in the "accurate" area.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Does this chart add clarity of where the ball should be thrown for you?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Not quite... is the elite part suggesting that's where elite QBs put it this last season? So therefore it's more elite to hit their edges instead of their main body?

Also, other seems to suggest that it's better to throw behind a WR, instead of in front of them?

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Not quite... is the elite part suggesting that's where elite QBs put it this last season? So therefore it's more elite to hit their edges instead of their main body?

Also, other seems to suggest that it's better to throw behind a WR, instead of in front of them?

Originally Posted by: beast 



Yes, if the WR is running into coverage, you as a WR want that ball slightly behind you to slow down your momentum. If you're running a slant with no one in front of you, then behind would be bad targeting.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
6 years ago
 vtse32.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago
Hundley’s problem was that he played the way Mike taught him to play, scared. He was unable and unwilling to anticipate when the WR was gonna break open, make a move or separate. All his throws were late and behind.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Hundley’s problem was that he played the way Mike taught him to play, scared. He was unable and unwilling to anticipate when the WR was gonna break open, make a move or separate. All his throws were late and behind.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



He wasn't taught to play scared, however, I do think you're right that he was scared. You could see it with his decision making. I think it was pounded into his head, from everyone (fans, teammates, coaches, media) that the season was riding on him so when he'd see a guy open, instead of immediately pulling the trigger, he'd hitch and re-cock and stare and then throw ... and guess what? The defense closes in and smacks the WR or picks it off.

That's something that bothered me a lot. Game after game, I didn't see progress on decision making. Just sling that shit. Trust your instincts! You'll get better. Shit, Peyton Manning threw more INT's in his rookie season than any other rookie ever! You gotta fall down to learn to pick yourself up.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

 vtse32.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



At the risk of me looking dumb, I don't understand your post Smokey. I know who the Soup Nazi is but what does it mean here?
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago

At the risk of me looking dumb, I don't understand your post Smokey. I know who the Soup Nazi is but what does it mean here?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



What? You don’t KNOW?!?!
NO SOUP FOR YOU WPR!!!!🤣
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Yes, if the WR is running into coverage, you as a WR want that ball slightly behind you to slow down your momentum. If you're running a slant with no one in front of you, then behind would be bad targeting.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yes, I got that... but why is behind, more elite? Unless, by your example... more WRs are running into coverage than out of it... (which I thought they were supposed to do the opposite of that).

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (26m) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.