uffda udfa
7 years ago
I find it curious that Aaron Rodgers wasn't extended this past season. Many praised the org for their cap brilliance in getting deals done with Adams and Linsley. Where's the extension for 12 and the cap brilliance of extending him before season's end?

We've had many bombshells over the last few days. Are we so certain the biggest one isn't about to drop...Aaron Rodgers wants out?

If he doesn't want out, why wasn't he extended? It would be really interesting to see another QB vs. the org situation developing.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


68md
7 years ago

I find it curious that Aaron Rodgers wasn't extended this past season. Many praised the org for their cap brilliance in getting deals done with Adams and Linsley. Where's the extension for 12 and the cap brilliance of extending him before season's end?

We've had many bombshells over the last few days. Are we so certain the biggest one isn't about to drop...Aaron Rodgers wants out?

If he doesn't want out, why wasn't he extended? It would be really interesting to see another QB vs. the org situation developing.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Even before all this went down the expectation was to do the extension this summer after the draft and GB had everything sorted personal wise.He's under contract for next season regardless and worst case scenario you franchise him and gain a season... at that point you have a 37 going on 38 yr old QB.

I really don't think that Rodgers not have a deal done yet has anything to with anything. Wasn't going to happen yet anyway you slice it. Sorry

nerdmann
7 years ago

Even before all this went down the expectation was to do the extension this summer after the draft and GB had everything sorted personal wise.He's under contract for next season regardless and worst case scenario you franchise him and gain a season... at that point you have a 37 going on 38 yr old QB.

I really don't think that Rodgers not have a deal done yet has anything to with anything. Wasn't going to happen yet anyway you slice it. Sorry

Originally Posted by: 68md 



Easier for the new GM to trade him this way. 😎
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Sorry? About what? Top priority is ensuring your franchise QB is taken care of contractually, not worrying about Davante Adams and Corey Linsley.

Stafford, Carr, Luck, Brees, and JOE FLACCO are set to make more money than Aaron Rodgers next season. Aaron is the 6th highest paid in the league. You think he and his agent(s) aren't aware of this?

What the org wants is just one side of the equation... Yes, the org can do exactly what you posted. That doesn't mean Aaron is going to play along. This could become highly contentious and untenable. We've already read and seen MM's reaction to what is going on at 1265 and it is far from positive. If MM is going to leave over feeling we aren't trying to win, what do you think the guy who wants to win most on this roster is going to do? Take it lying down? 12 has taken some veiled shots in the past at the org.

I think if MM is willing to walk over Ball getting the GM for the idea we're not about winning, you can't dismiss Aaron Rodgers not wanting to be here out of hand.

There is a problem at 1265. There are those who apparently want to go for winning SuperBowls and there are those who want status quo about it continuing to be about financial stability.

My hope is if those who are about financial stability get their way it blows up in their faces, MM and 12 leave and this team goes back to the 80's bankrupting the newly built district, and a steady diet of noon games hosted by the bottom of the barrel broadcast teams and more.

It's not been about winning in Green Bay for a long long time. It's been about financial stability and don't think Aaron isn't aware his window is closing especially after another wasted year due to injury. His clock is ticking loudly and to hitch your wagon to a loser who doesn't want to win isn't something he's going to sign up for.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DoddPower
7 years ago

Sorry? About what? Top priority is ensuring your franchise QB is taken care of contractually, not worrying about Davante Adams and Corey Linsley.

Stafford, Carr, Luck, Brees, and JOE FLACCO are set to make more money than Aaron Rodgers next season. Aaron is the 6th highest paid in the league. You think he and his agent(s) aren't aware of this?

What the org wants is just one side of the equation... Yes, the org can do exactly what you posted. That doesn't mean Aaron is going to play along. This could become highly contentious and untenable. We've already read and seen MM's reaction to what is going on at 1265 and it is far from positive. If Mike McCarthy is going to leave over feeling we aren't trying to win, what do you think the guy who wants to win most on this roster is going to do? Take it lying down? 12 has taken some veiled shots in the past at the org.

I think if Mike McCarthy is willing to walk over Ball getting the GM for the idea we're not about winning, you can't dismiss Aaron Rodgers not wanting to be here out of hand.

There is a problem at 1265. There are those who apparently want to go for winning SuperBowls and there are those who want status quo about it continuing to be about financial stability.

My hope is if those who are about financial stability get their way it blows up in their faces, Mike McCarthy and 12 leave and this team goes back to the 80's bankrupting the newly built district, and a steady diet of noon games hosted by the bottom of the barrel broadcast teams and more.

It's not been about winning in Green Bay for a long long time. It's been about financial stability and don't think Aaron isn't aware his window is closing especially after another wasted year due to injury. His clock is ticking loudly and to hitch your wagon to a loser who doesn't want to win isn't something he's going to sign up for.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think we all need to let things play out before passing judgment. You have no idea what's going to happen at this point. You are being played by the media when half of what they report may be a complete smoke screen perpetuated by the Green Bay Packers, the reporters, potential candidates, or most likely a combination of all involved. It's fine to pass judgement once final decisions have been made, but at this point, it's all conjecture. That might be entertaining for some and is fine for an online forum, it's a rather pointless exercise. Much of what we currently think we "know" could be very far off from the eventual reality. But it's good for the media outlets, if nothing else. Perceived controversy sells, whether it's true or not.
beast
7 years ago
Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
7 years ago

Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I mean yeah, some guys are getting more than him. But take the money over the life of the contract. Ted and Russ make those cap friendly. Because they are the best at what they do.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in his contract after this year.

I always thought that was pretty useless because everyone knew Ted would take care of Aaron.

Now i am not so sure.

when I find the article I will add it to this post.

Here it is look after 2017 season.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/ 
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in hes contract after this year.

I always thought that was pretty useless because everyone knew Ted wouold take care of Aaron.

Now i am not so sure.

when I find the article I will add it to this post.

Here it is look after 2017 season.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/ 

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



The opt out thing was a thread started by me here. I believe the option is the team's not Aaron's.

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t26382-Aaron-Rodgers-Can-Opt-Out-at-End-of-Season 

No way the team exercises it. They'll get a nice compensation package if Aaron creates another Favre situation here.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in his contract after this year.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



The opt out thing was a thread started by me here. I believe the option is the team's not Aaron's.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



The opt out clause was fake news... which like a lot of the other fake news got people to over react for nothing.

spotrac set up a "POTENTIAL OUT:" after the current year to show what might happen if said veteran player was released. Check Nelson and Cobb, they got them too.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (14m) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
20h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.