uffda udfa
7 years ago
I find it curious that Aaron Rodgers wasn't extended this past season. Many praised the org for their cap brilliance in getting deals done with Adams and Linsley. Where's the extension for 12 and the cap brilliance of extending him before season's end?

We've had many bombshells over the last few days. Are we so certain the biggest one isn't about to drop...Aaron Rodgers wants out?

If he doesn't want out, why wasn't he extended? It would be really interesting to see another QB vs. the org situation developing.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


68md
7 years ago

I find it curious that Aaron Rodgers wasn't extended this past season. Many praised the org for their cap brilliance in getting deals done with Adams and Linsley. Where's the extension for 12 and the cap brilliance of extending him before season's end?

We've had many bombshells over the last few days. Are we so certain the biggest one isn't about to drop...Aaron Rodgers wants out?

If he doesn't want out, why wasn't he extended? It would be really interesting to see another QB vs. the org situation developing.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Even before all this went down the expectation was to do the extension this summer after the draft and GB had everything sorted personal wise.He's under contract for next season regardless and worst case scenario you franchise him and gain a season... at that point you have a 37 going on 38 yr old QB.

I really don't think that Rodgers not have a deal done yet has anything to with anything. Wasn't going to happen yet anyway you slice it. Sorry

nerdmann
7 years ago

Even before all this went down the expectation was to do the extension this summer after the draft and GB had everything sorted personal wise.He's under contract for next season regardless and worst case scenario you franchise him and gain a season... at that point you have a 37 going on 38 yr old QB.

I really don't think that Rodgers not have a deal done yet has anything to with anything. Wasn't going to happen yet anyway you slice it. Sorry

Originally Posted by: 68md 



Easier for the new GM to trade him this way. 😎
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Sorry? About what? Top priority is ensuring your franchise QB is taken care of contractually, not worrying about Davante Adams and Corey Linsley.

Stafford, Carr, Luck, Brees, and JOE FLACCO are set to make more money than Aaron Rodgers next season. Aaron is the 6th highest paid in the league. You think he and his agent(s) aren't aware of this?

What the org wants is just one side of the equation... Yes, the org can do exactly what you posted. That doesn't mean Aaron is going to play along. This could become highly contentious and untenable. We've already read and seen MM's reaction to what is going on at 1265 and it is far from positive. If Mike McCarthy is going to leave over feeling we aren't trying to win, what do you think the guy who wants to win most on this roster is going to do? Take it lying down? 12 has taken some veiled shots in the past at the org.

I think if Mike McCarthy is willing to walk over Ball getting the GM for the idea we're not about winning, you can't dismiss Aaron Rodgers not wanting to be here out of hand.

There is a problem at 1265. There are those who apparently want to go for winning SuperBowls and there are those who want status quo about it continuing to be about financial stability.

My hope is if those who are about financial stability get their way it blows up in their faces, Mike McCarthy and 12 leave and this team goes back to the 80's bankrupting the newly built district, and a steady diet of noon games hosted by the bottom of the barrel broadcast teams and more.

It's not been about winning in Green Bay for a long long time. It's been about financial stability and don't think Aaron isn't aware his window is closing especially after another wasted year due to injury. His clock is ticking loudly and to hitch your wagon to a loser who doesn't want to win isn't something he's going to sign up for.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DoddPower
7 years ago

Sorry? About what? Top priority is ensuring your franchise QB is taken care of contractually, not worrying about Davante Adams and Corey Linsley.

Stafford, Carr, Luck, Brees, and JOE FLACCO are set to make more money than Aaron Rodgers next season. Aaron is the 6th highest paid in the league. You think he and his agent(s) aren't aware of this?

What the org wants is just one side of the equation... Yes, the org can do exactly what you posted. That doesn't mean Aaron is going to play along. This could become highly contentious and untenable. We've already read and seen MM's reaction to what is going on at 1265 and it is far from positive. If Mike McCarthy is going to leave over feeling we aren't trying to win, what do you think the guy who wants to win most on this roster is going to do? Take it lying down? 12 has taken some veiled shots in the past at the org.

I think if Mike McCarthy is willing to walk over Ball getting the GM for the idea we're not about winning, you can't dismiss Aaron Rodgers not wanting to be here out of hand.

There is a problem at 1265. There are those who apparently want to go for winning SuperBowls and there are those who want status quo about it continuing to be about financial stability.

My hope is if those who are about financial stability get their way it blows up in their faces, Mike McCarthy and 12 leave and this team goes back to the 80's bankrupting the newly built district, and a steady diet of noon games hosted by the bottom of the barrel broadcast teams and more.

It's not been about winning in Green Bay for a long long time. It's been about financial stability and don't think Aaron isn't aware his window is closing especially after another wasted year due to injury. His clock is ticking loudly and to hitch your wagon to a loser who doesn't want to win isn't something he's going to sign up for.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think we all need to let things play out before passing judgment. You have no idea what's going to happen at this point. You are being played by the media when half of what they report may be a complete smoke screen perpetuated by the Green Bay Packers, the reporters, potential candidates, or most likely a combination of all involved. It's fine to pass judgement once final decisions have been made, but at this point, it's all conjecture. That might be entertaining for some and is fine for an online forum, it's a rather pointless exercise. Much of what we currently think we "know" could be very far off from the eventual reality. But it's good for the media outlets, if nothing else. Perceived controversy sells, whether it's true or not.
beast
7 years ago
Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
7 years ago

Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I mean yeah, some guys are getting more than him. But take the money over the life of the contract. Ted and Russ make those cap friendly. Because they are the best at what they do.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

Didn't we already have a thread for this? Seems like a lot of new threads for threads we have already started.

Doesn't Rodgers have two years left on his current contract? So no need to worry about the guy we all know is gonna get paid.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in his contract after this year.

I always thought that was pretty useless because everyone knew Ted would take care of Aaron.

Now i am not so sure.

when I find the article I will add it to this post.

Here it is look after 2017 season.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/ 
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in hes contract after this year.

I always thought that was pretty useless because everyone knew Ted wouold take care of Aaron.

Now i am not so sure.

when I find the article I will add it to this post.

Here it is look after 2017 season.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/ 

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



The opt out thing was a thread started by me here. I believe the option is the team's not Aaron's.

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t26382-Aaron-Rodgers-Can-Opt-Out-at-End-of-Season 

No way the team exercises it. They'll get a nice compensation package if Aaron creates another Favre situation here.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

I am trying to find the story, but i am sure Aaron has an opt out clause in his contract after this year.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



The opt out thing was a thread started by me here. I believe the option is the team's not Aaron's.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



The opt out clause was fake news... which like a lot of the other fake news got people to over react for nothing.

spotrac set up a "POTENTIAL OUT:" after the current year to show what might happen if said veteran player was released. Check Nelson and Cobb, they got them too.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (48m) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (3h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (4h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (21h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (22h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.