It Was There for Us. Many Times Over.· Page 2

rabidgopher04
Member

7 years ago

I just want to say that it sure seemed like our defense played better without the money guys in there. This Loss was all on the offense. Also time to dump Hundley he cannot throw anything over 5 yards accurate.

Originally Posted by: dhazer

On the first deep pass, all #11 had to do was extend his arms, MAYBE even have to lay out just a little for the pass. It was catchable. It all unraveled after that.

Amazing Bacon Delivery Service! Never be without good bacon again.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: dhazer

That was the Vikings QBs first cold weather game and he played HORRIBLE! I think due to the cold weather, the Vikings offense helped make the Packers defense look good.

I need to first stipulate that Hundley seriously struggles on mid-deep throws and he has a very low bar... that being said... until the Packers got desperate late (and Hundley was badly missing)... that might of been Hundley's best job throwing passes to mid-deep range... as a number of them were hitting the WRs/TE hands... but they kept dropping them. But that might be the most mid level passes, that I've seen Hundley get to the WR/TE hands... it was a better than average day from him.

so why did Mike McCarthy keep calling plays for deep passes?

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest

Because they were trying to win the game! ... Mike McCarthy tried the short passes, and the catches couldn't keep catching for an entire drive... so Packers got desperate... and were trying to get a long ball or PI called... and never could get one. The refs weirdly put that one on Hawkins, but refused to call the one later on Clark, which looked worse....

Because he's too stubborn to change!
We have seen that over and over through the years.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Mike McCarthy did change... he started with the short passes... clearly that didn't work... so he went to long passes. Vikings were defending the run, making Packers try to throw it.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#13

Our D did enough to win the game, but offense was non existent . WR's that can't catch, a QB that can't throw..,..7-9.

bboystyle
Member

7 years ago

#14

This game, like the SEASON was there for the taking.

We just didn't take it.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

What did u expect? we were gonna beat a legit team with Hundley? 🤣

The team is a joke. Dont care if they win or lose next week. Just need to clean house already and quit wasting Rodgers career. Fire TT, Capers and Mike McCarthy already

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

7 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: bboystyle

The team with Aaron Rodgers is a Super Bowl contender, yet, without him we're no better than a .500 team. So, you want to clean house? That doesn't even make sense, lol.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#16

I don't believe we are a super bowl team. Playoffs, maybe.
Unless this defense improves, super bowl is a dream only.

bboystyle
Member

6 years ago

#17

The team with Aaron Rodgers is a Super Bowl contender, yet, without him we're no better than a .500 team. So, you want to clean house? That doesn't even make sense, lol.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

ahh that makes perfect sense. it means these coaches are clueless and our GM cant draft any impact players. my post really wasnt that hard to figure out. if a team revolves around 1 player, then its a horrible team on and off the field.

i didnt say to cut or trade rodgers. i said to fire capers, Ted Thompson and mm. thats cleaning house. we need new blood to run and coach this team.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (5m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (7m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (18m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS