Should they even think about Bringing Rodgers back?· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

7 years ago

I realize that you know.
Do they bring Aaron back? I hope not. I want it to heal. I am concerned what would happen if they bring him back at 75%

Originally Posted by: wpr

When I talk about Aaron Rodgers coming back, it's under the knowledge (assumed) he's 100%. Aaron has made it very clear he will not return unless he's 100% healed. Everything I've heard him say in interviews and his talk show he had support this. That being said, the dude is competitive as fuck. If the Packers have a CHANCE to knock the Vikings out by beating them December 23rd, I wouldn't be surprised if he suits up at 90% just to do that.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#12

. But then the next question is will GB WANT to trade him? I don't see Callahan as being ready to fill in next year

Originally Posted by: wpr

We only have him for one more year. After that we get nothing for him. I think the team will take what ever they can get for him and move Callahan up and look for another prospect.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#13

We only have him for one more year. After that we get nothing for him. I think the team will take what ever they can get for him and move Callahan up and look for another prospect.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

I am aware of that. I still don't see them trading him. Protection, such as it is for Aaron is worth something. Probably more than what they will receive in a trade.

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Yep. I say he will want to put on the pads at 70-80% in that scenario.

nerdmann
Premier Member

7 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Aaron carries a vendetta. Remember all the shit he got from the Favre loyalists?

Dude wants to feed Barr a shit burger.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#16

This is all really simple.

If the Packers are out of playoff contention when he's ~80% or better (no longer at enhanced risk of re-injuring), he won't come back.

If the Packers are in playoff contention when he's ~80% or better (no longer at enhanced risk of re-injuring), he will come back.

He MIGHT wait an extra week or two if Hundley's showing he can reliably win football games.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#17

All this year is going to do for this org is push back the time table for change yet another year. We'll just push back the next playoff blowout loss until next season so Ted Thompson and MM can go out on what should feel just like home to them both.

No reason to even think of playing him with this defense. I was an advocate for bridging a couple of wins to make his return tenable. He's not going to return without his extension anyway. I would almost take that one to the bank, so if all of a sudden we hear of an extension in the next few weeks, you can pretty much bet he's coming back this year.

With this defense, there is no reason to bring him back...heck, probably not a reason to bring him back at all until we have something radically changed to offer hope our D will be better.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (13m) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (14m) : now 3

Zero2Cool (1h) : Who? What?

beast (9h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (14h) : meh

Zero2Cool (18h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (18h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (18h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24