PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

No video to corroborate Bennett's contention means it didn't happen? We dont have video because THE COPS TURNED OFF THEIR CAMERAS! Or imagining the shit-storm for putting a gun to an NFL players head while threatening to blow it off, they tampered with evidence by disposing of the video. Again, bad cops work not to document their badness and will work to undocument it when necessary!!!

Ranger Villeneuva of Steelers upon further reflection admitted he made a mistake standing in tunnel for the Anthem. And not all of our military/Vets know why they fight/fought. They fight to preserve, the rule of law, the peaceful transition of power and liberty and freedom for all; to preserve our national security. Cops profiling, harassing, assaulting, batterying and/or assassinating minorities violates each reason. There are racists and racially insensitive in the military and to the military/vet that innocently doesn't get it, we still very much appreciate your service; but you should reflect before you speak.

Not everyone has to have the exact same agenda to protest or to openly support protesters. Some get more vocal when it becomes more real, like realizing your brother death was continent on an enraged adrenaline filled lunatic's twitching of his index finger. Some become outraged when they see how protesters are treated; that's why I ended up at Standing Rock with several military/veterans, I'm convinced this prevented blood shed. And if the State takes issue with private protest like Trump did; that is sill another reason to now realize you must help to preserve a free America. BTW, Trump's behavior gives Kaepernick a path to a 1st amendment suit for the loss of his employment.

Kaepernik stuff FALSE and will be considered a prevarication until you source your position.
Kendrick point silly which must be: once protesting about police violence; he cant speak about PR.

You argue the movement is based on outliers; but then use outlier examples to argue "nobody" knows what they're protesting. Dot be a flip-flop sally. Outliers either prove or dont prove an issue; but ya cant flip-flop to suit the shameful argument you set forth.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Outliers, this entire "Protest" is based on a few outliers. But I guess that is beyond your bigoted mind to understand.

By the way where is your post about the Tennessee Church shooting.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
When we try to compare non-professional athlete's to professional athletes, it really shows a big lack of understanding of the dynamics between the two and how diverse the requirements are.

Anyhow, apparently we want to try anyway.

Ok Bar and Porforis , let's try an experiment tomorrow. I want you to go into work and clock in and after that I want you to go outside and start protesting. Like against the KKK or BLM whatever and I can guarantee you won't have a job for very long.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


You do realize the not standing for the national anthem is taking only a few minutes, right? Therefore, taking a few minutes to protest something outside of your work, probably not even going to be noticed let alone grounds for termination.


Why well #1 once you clock in you are property of the owner of the company and you are wasting time and not being productive.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


The property of the owner? Are you serious with this? Are you this clueless? Are you this out of touch with reality to think you are even remotely stumbling onto something here? Property?!?! No, absolutely NOT. You can leave your job whenever you want, just the same as most others, therefore you are NOT the property of the owner. Holy damn.


#2 is if it brings negative feedback towards your company you would be let go. So the way I look at it the players are on the clock when they protest so it is wrong and it brings negative feedback towards the club.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


Players are always on the clock. If they get a DUI in the off-season, it makes the club look bad. Players have been released.


They can do all their protesting on social media or go out in the Parking lot before or after the game and protest away.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


I agree with this. Those who are protesting the oppression of blacks should move this forward if they want results.


What I would love to see is at halftime of next weeks games the security all takes a knee and lets the crowd do whatever they want to the players. I think that would be justice.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


What does this solve? What does this help? It helps nothing and no one and only proves how irrational and clueless this entire post has been.


I understand you are pissed off players are disrespecting the Country and the Flag. I get it, but take a breath, step back and look at the big picture without the hyperbolic emotional tirades.

I feel everyone should stand during the National Anthem. Everyone.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

How?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



If Kap alleged losing his government job over his speech; the suit would be viable; the problem is he didn't lose a State job.

However, if the private employer conspired with the State to cause the loss of his job; he'd have a viable cause of action.

Now Kap can try to allege the State did conspire with the NFL. Conspiracy can be proven by circumstantial evidence because the hard evidence one normally needs to prove allegations rests in the hands of the conspirators.

Kap could use Trump's and other State officials' relationships w/ the owners; and how some of his policies are designed to help big business, which also helps Owners; and Trump's statements about "firing" the protesting "SOBs" and those he made about taking money away from the Saints for protesting; to argue there's an on going agreement between the Owners.

This might seem weak. But ya got PODUS saying Kap should not have a job and Kap not having a job. A judge might let discovery go forward.
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

If Kap alleged losing his government job over his speech; the suit would be viable; the problem is he didn't lose a State job.

However, if the private employer conspired with the State to cause the loss of his job; he'd have a viable cause of action.

Now Kap can try to allege the State did conspire with the NFL. Conspiracy can be proven by circumstantial evidence because the hard evidence one normally needs to prove allegations rests in the hands of the conspirators.

Kap could use Trump's and other State officials' relationships w/ the owners; and how some of his policies are designed to help big business, which also helps Owners; and Trump's statements about "firing" the protesting "SOBs" and those he made about taking money away from the Saints for protesting; to argue there's an on going agreement between the Owners.

This might seem weak. But ya got PODUS saying Kap should not have a job and Kap not having a job. A judge might let discovery go forward.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Kaepernick didn't lose his job. He opted out of his contract. He Quit.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

Kaepernick didn't lose his job. He opted out of his contract. He Quit.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Well I should have said his continuing unemployment is proximately caused by collusion between NFL and State resulting from his speech.

He got paid for his work last year so that issue is moot...Though saying Kap quit is naive. The reality was that it he did not have a choice to stay with SF.

Kap had a contract guaranteed for several years to injury. SF came to him in 2016 and said, "renegotiate or get cut." They were already on the hook for 2016; but they would not let him play until he renegotiated, because a career ender would have cost SF for several years. The reneg was complete a few days before 10-16-16, he started on 10-16. The agreement was that he'd play the rest of 2016 with a provision that either SF and Kap could opt out in 2017.

SF notified him in 2017 that they were going to exercise their opt out and they agreed to let Kap exercise his opt out first.
Smokey
7 years ago
As long as the NFL must endure protest , I'd just like to know what is being protested.
Every citizen of legal age can vote.
Every child in America is offered the opportunity to attend school (K->12) and many continue on to college.
Also if one applies oneself and succeeds , scholarships are available . In addition , community colleges are very affordable and offer day / and night classes .
Anyone that puts forth the effort and earns a promotion, can get ahead if an open position exist .
Any man or woman can get medical attention in any emergency room in America .

IMO , if your willing to put down the Alcohol / Drugs and work to make your life better, then anyone can succeed . Companies are always short of highly qualified personal and sometimes will help their employees go to College / Trade Schools.

What is the protest all about ? [confused]

UserPostedImage
isocleas2
7 years ago

biggest problem today is nobody knows what they are protesting about anymore. Kaepernick started not even protesting. He was simply sitting, the "protesting" didn't come out until weeks later to try and protect his ass "image". And that was based on a lie or misrepresentation in the first place. Hell, Lance Kendricks was talking about Puerto Rico. Bennett is supposedly protesting about his brothers treatment and the video of that doesn't show anything to back up that claim. Some of them were protesting because kaepernick doesn't have a job. That makes the act of disrespecting the flag and anthem even worse.


In addition, players are saying they were not disrespecting our military or veterans. Clearly from the response to these protests, the act HAS disrespected many, not all by many veterans and military members. Going forward, if they continue to protest in this manner, they do so knowing their act is disrespectful.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Any vet worth his salt will tell you joined the military to protect this country and the VALUES it holds dear, one of those being the right to peacefully protest. They didn't swear an allegiance to the flag, they swore it to their country. We believe in freedom in this country and we don't demand our people to kowtow to any false idol (a flag, a dictator, a song, anything). That's what weak countries with strongman leaders do: demand obedience.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/veterans-knee-support-national-anthem-protests/story?id=50075609 

isocleas2
7 years ago

As long as the NFL must endure protest , I'd just like to know what is being protested.
Every citizen of legal age can vote.
Every child in America is offered the opportunity to attend school (K->12) and many continue on to college.
Also if one applies oneself and succeeds , scholarships are available . In addition , community colleges are very affordable and offer day / and night classes .
Anyone that puts forth the effort and earns a promotion, can get ahead if an open position exist .
Any man or woman can get medical attention in any emergency room in America .

IMO , if your willing to put down the Alcohol / Drugs and work to make your life better, then anyone can succeed . Companies are always short of highly qualified personal and sometimes will help their employees go to College / Trade Schools.

What is the protest all about ? [confused]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Its about police brutality namely towards people of color, and racial inequality. It now also in part became a protest against Trump because of what he said last week (or could argue when he's said all year).

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/colin-kaepernick-football-protests.html?mcubz=0 

Some nice tidbits: Kaepernick was protesting silently by sitting on the bench but no one knew about it for a few weeks because it was pre-season and he wasn't making a big deal about it. But his teammates and coaches knew what was up from the very start (despite what some posters want to believe). They talked to a former NFL player who was also a former Green Beret, and he recommended they kneel instead of sit since its more respectful to the military.

#VeteransforKaepernick
yooperfan
7 years ago
Thus far, the players, coaches and owners have participated in peaceful protest, but I expect that we will see some "fans" that will use these peaceful protests to turn to violence.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (34m) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
    dfosterf (3h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
    wpr (4h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
    Zero2Cool (7h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : don't care
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
    packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
    wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
    wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
    beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

    22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.