I see a difference between being upset after a loss, and just being negative. If anything perhaps this little sidebar will result in more actual discussion about players and plays of the games and less, Fire Ted, Fire Mike, Fire Dom, Rodgers sucks.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

It pleases me to see members like yourself and other seldom seen members favoring the forum with postings . I hope it will serve as an inspiration for more seldom seen members to post as well.

So thank you Sir, may I have another . LOL

Originally Posted by: Smokey 

or when someone who witnessed something you refute with "couch expert" and completely dismiss their first hand knowledge because you don't agree with it. I think that's negative. 😝

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

So you just moonlight with programming message boards you are really part of the Packers training staff? 😝

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

Since I've been watching the Packers for over 40 years (shut up, yes i'm gettin old) I tend to take each win & loss with a grain of salt. My God people, I'm a Packer fan in ILLINOIS!!! I went years of just hoping we'd beat the Bears at least once in any given season so I could put on my Packers shirt & finally get a chance to gloat!! Maybe it's come with my age but let's be honest here guys - it's a game, not the end of the freakin world, not the reason to have your day ruined - life goes on. I understand getting annoyed during game chats & like Zero said in the first 24 hours post game but then - I let it go.

Now, having said all that...I can get pissed as hell when we lose, frustrated at the play calling, annoyed with the coaches, & yes, even the players!!! Don't they know we're supposed to win every damn game?!?

Originally Posted by: 4PackGirl 

Every year 31 out of 32 teams go home without a ring, to be honest the Packers are held to such a high standard year after year that you are more guilty of your unrealistic expectations than anything. Marino was probably a better Qb than Favre or Rodgers and he never won shit.

Ease up on your kids btw, or good luck when they pick your retirement home down the road 🤣

Originally Posted by: isocleas2 

I would say those same legit team numbers exist every year. We have had the best QB or top 3 QB in the league for almost 25 years now. I would say that the odds were in our favour to have more than 2 friggin' rings to show for it. Do I love that we win and am I spoiled? You are damn right, but man when the eventual suck happens I am really going to wish we did more when we had two of the biggest game changers in the league as our QBs.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 

If you're narrrowing down the number of teams you're comparing yourself to the elite teams then of course your team will look not as good vs comparing them to all 31 other teams. That being said, let's look at your list and how many super bowls they've won in the last 25 years when we've had a top 2 or 3 QB.

Falcons - 0
Broncos - 3
Packers - 2
Steelers - 2
Patriots - 5
Chiefs - 0
Raiders - 0
Cowboys - 3

So basically we've had a top 2 or 3 QB every year (debatable but definitely top 5) for 25 years and we're the #4 team in super bowl rings. Isn't that damned close to where we should be at?

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

If you're narrrowing down the number of teams you're comparing yourself to the elite teams then of course your team will look not as good vs comparing them to all 31 other teams. That being said, let's look at your list and how many super bowls they've won in the last 25 years when we've had a top 2 or 3 QB.

Falcons - 0
Broncos - 3
Packers - 2
Steelers - 2
Patriots - 5
Chiefs - 0
Raiders - 0
Cowboys - 3

So basically we've had a top 2 or 3 QB every year (debatable but definitely top 5) for 25 years and we're the #4 team in super bowl rings. Isn't that damned close to where we should be at?

Originally Posted by: Porforis