Since you're so interested in facts. Tell all of us the qualifications of the guys at PFF? After that, please give yours.
Here's two quick facts for you. Year after year you predict success for the Packers D presumably based on your "facts". This never materializes or is even in the ballpark of reality.
The other is your dogmatic insistence that Richard Rodgers was going to be a star based on you watching every play. We went at it on this issue while you disparaged me just like you've done here.
Damarious Randall is not a viable starting NFL CB. All of your excuses for our secondary doesn't change the fact that Dez and Julio went off for over 300 yards on 18 catches and 4 TDs. You've got the real truth that this really wasn't what it seemed? Please. Our CBs were atrocious and are likely to be again.
Again you say this D is set for a great year. 6 straight seasons of bad defense is the fact here. Perhaps, you will be right this year. 1 out of 7 years is still terrible regardless of how you frame it.
I hope the corners play great as well as the D. It isn't likely. I don't understand how you can continue bashing the truth to try and get to me. I'll stand with the facts. You stay with your perception of them.
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."