beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago
These are the Packers FAs (according to spotrac).

Who do you want the Packers to resign?

UFAs will hit the open market (though one can be slapped with a franchise tagged which comes which a huge pay day).
UFA
RB Eddie Lacy
RB Christine Michael
TE Jared Cook
OG T.J. Lang
OC J.C. Tretter
OL Don Barclay
OLB Nick Perry
OLB Julius Peppers
OLB Datone Jones
DB Micah Hyde
LS Brett Goode


RFAs, need a tender placed on them (usually original round tender get placed on them), if they don't get a tender offered to them, then they also hit the open market.
RFA
OLB Jayrone Elliot
ILB Jordan Tripp
P Jake Schum

ERFAs, basically have to resign with the Packers, unless the Packers don't want them.
ERFA
RB John Crockett
RB Don Jackson
FB Joe Kerridge
ILB Joe Thomas
DL Christian Ringo
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
7 years ago
Nice post Beast, but I want your opinion too!😂

I hear Ted is considering signing Goode, ya know cause we need a LS, and rolling 46M into 2018.

Spotrac as you show lists Schum as a RFA, but I think he's an ERFA. To be RFA ya gotta have 3 accrued years, Schum only has 2.

Of course, we sign all the ERFAs for min. contracts and see if they can make the team.

The lowest RFA tender last year was 1.671M; so this year its about 1.8M. I think I try to sign Elliot as an UFA [cheaper than that] and Tripp no more than min.

The only position of need we have is OLB. I have no idea what Perry is worth-spotrac has his market value at 8.6M x5, I'll take it. But his agent will probably try to sell him as a 34 DE and Vernon last year got 85M/5yr w/ 52M G and he had 7.5 sacks in contract year and 29 total in his 4 year career. Though Vernon never missed a game.

They have Cook at 3.3M x 4, I'll take that too; but no more.

Spotrac has Lang at 8.4 x 4. I dont see Ted paying that, I'll take him at 6.5-7M, his injury will help.

Tretter is a problem. Cant give him starter money, but someone will. We only sign him if we dont sign Lang and not for more that 3M for 1 year. Then if he plays an entire season, then we can pay him market. Spotrac has him at 8.7 x 6; someone is on drugs. He's gone. Patrick and Flores will shine

Lacy: spotrac has him at 5.1 x3. Zero chance! 1 year 2M unless he play 2 ways [starting at NT too].

Hyde and Jones are nice due to versatility, Jone 2 x 3 M; Hyde 3 x 4M.

Peppers isn't coming back, I'd do 2 X 5m if he does [depends on what Ted has lined up in free agency as well].

Christine, Barclay = min.

8.6 +3.3 + 7 [or save Lang's 7M and go with Spriggs] + 2 + 3 + 4 =28M - 3M offset for 6 guys cut + 10M for rookies and 2017 carry over leaves about 8-9M for Ted to go hog wild in free agency. And it'll be 12M if Guion gets cut.

Oh and we got PLENTY of cap space in 2018 w/ these signings. [Linsley, Taylor, Adams, Burnett, R.Rodgers are UFAs]

PS: NE has 62 M in cap space, Brady only counts 14M against cap [Rodgers is 20]. But they have 7 starters plus 2 key back-ups [Bennett (TE) ; Harmon (DB)] and Butler is a RFA who will have to be tendered at highest tender.
musccy
7 years ago
Yes:
TE Jared Cook
OG T.J. Lang
OC J.C. Tretter
OLB Nick Perry
DB Micah Hyde
P Jake Schum

Sure, why not?:
RB Eddie Lacy
LS Brett Goode

Save the $:
Everyone else
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Cook
Lang
Tretter
Perry

Those are the only ones I would be focused on. Perry is probably getting into crazy money territory. Will what happened with Hayward cause him to pony up for Perry? The franchise tag might be something to consider with Perry. Peppers money will be gone and that's better spent on Nick. Plus, Ted not likely to let a first rounder get away now that he finally produced for an extended period.

Cook will definitely be back. Not sure anyone is going to beat down his door. Prefer a 2-3 year deal for him but dummy 4th might be added. Hoping we still draft a TE. Cook isn't enough and doesn't have many years left. OJ Howard has to be a temptation late in 1st.

Believe strongly in retaining Tretter but he's hurt so much it'd be hard to commit a lot to him.

Lang needs to be here if we're all in. His injury history and age works in our favor with TJ. Believe he's the type to give a hometown discount. Hoping he gets less than Sitton got from the Bears but guessing he'll be shooting for a similar deal. Okay with something a little less but no way more than Josh got.

Lacy is a maybe for me. Doesn't seem to love football but is a nice player when healthy and in shape. Only back on a very friendly deal...the one we just gave to Starks would be plenty for Lacy. Don't want Michael back. We have Ty Montgomery and nothing else but Ripkowski who I think is a fine player. Could be a Mike Alstott type for us. Can give us what Eddie does. Prefer we use a high pick for a RB. Dalvin Cook would be a dream, but I really like Perine from OU and am intrigued by the Tennessee kid if he's there in the middle of the draft. Think we should really look to draft a good RB and it's a high priority area.

The rest I really don't care about. All of them can go elsewhere but know some will be here.

EDIT: I would like Joe Thomas back. I was remiss in overlooking him.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


TheKanataThrilla
7 years ago

Prefer we use a high pick for a RB. Dalvin Cook would be a dream, but I really like Perine from OU and am intrigued by the Tennessee kid if he's there in the middle of the draft. Think we should really look to draft a good RB and it's a high priority area.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think our RB draft will depend on what they decide to do with Lacy. I do think he will be offered a 1 year deal. A guy I like from what I have been reading is James Conner from Pitt. The guy is a pounder like Lacy without the work ethic concern.

uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think our RB draft will depend on what they decide to do with Lacy. I do think he will be offered a 1 year deal. A guy I like from what I have been reading is James Conner from Pitt. The guy is a pounder like Lacy without the work ethic concern.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



I agree that what happens with Eddie will dictate what we do in the draft at that position. I think we can err on the very low side with Eddie and feel extremely confident we can replace him with ease. This RB class is historically great as far as how it's projects. Hard to sit on the sidelines and not get one. Shoot, I'll bet Ted will be rocking if McCaffery is there at the end of Round 1. So hard to pass him up but there are others to be found later like Conner, the BYU kid, and Hood from Carolina and more.

If Perry walks then finding an OLB will become a need. Clay seems to be nearing a huge drop off and the cupboard is bare even with Nick. Classic overpay scenario developing there so I think he'll stay.

Fear Hyde is going to stick just because he's about the best we have and we value versatility over production. If Randall and Rollins were inclining Hyde would be easy to move on from. I think some team will step in and pay him. I just pray we aren't in any bidding war for his services.

This is going to be the most interesting off season since the Favre fiasco. Can't wait to see something and won't like it if it's another nothing to see here let down.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


luigis
7 years ago
Cook and Lang are Musts
Perry and Hyde are nice to have

All the others can go...
Luis
nerdmann
7 years ago

I think our RB draft will depend on what they decide to do with Lacy. I do think he will be offered a 1 year deal. A guy I like from what I have been reading is James Conner from Pitt. The guy is a pounder like Lacy without the work ethic concern.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



We also still have Jackson and Crockett. I think both can play, although Jackson is a little fast for Mike's taste at this position.

Let the Bears overpay Lang. Tretter is both younger and more versatile.

Goode, Cook, Hyde and Schum come back for sure. Make Perry an offer, but he's a 4-3 DE. Probably will get paid much more as that, given the versatility he has shown playing 3-4 OLB. That versatility is WAY more valuable as a DE. No one cares about a run stuffing OLB. 🤣

Make Lacy an offer contingent upon showing up in shape. He sacrificed himself for the team this year, deserves a decent offer. Don't overpay though. We've already got Ripkowski.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Yerko
7 years ago

These are the Packers FAs (according to spotrac).

Who do you want the Packers to resign?

UFAs will hit the open market (though one can be slapped with a franchise tagged which comes which a huge pay day).
UFA
RB Eddie Lacy
RB Christine Michael
TE Jared Cook
OG T.J. Lang
OC J.C. Tretter
OL Don Barclay
OLB Nick Perry
OLB Julius Peppers
OLB Datone Jones
DB Micah Hyde
LS Brett Goode


RFAs, need a tender placed on them (usually original round tender get placed on them), if they don't get a tender offered to them, then they also hit the open market.
RFA
OLB Jayrone Elliot
ILB Jordan Tripp
P Jake Schum

ERFAs, basically have to resign with the Packers, unless the Packers don't want them.
ERFA
RB John Crockett
RB Don Jackson
FB Joe Kerridge
ILB Joe Thomas
DL Christian Ringo

Originally Posted by: beast 



Must:
Lang
Cook
Perry
Hyde

Maybe:
Lacy
Tretter
Barclay

No:
Jones
Peppers
Michael

Lang is a stalwart to this offense and team. Passionate dude who brings his all. While injured, he has played through the minor stuff. I think letting him walk would be a mistake.

Cook has shown his value to this offense. Hopefully he comes at the right price.

I am skeptical about Perry with his ridiculous injury history and what will be his high contract demand. Pack are short at OLB though so he is a huge need.

Hyde is one of our better corners and this is another position the Packers are in need of. He has done good things for the Pack and should come at a decent price.

I personally think Lacy is crapped on too much. I believe the Pack can get him at a good price and he is important to the offense. I don't like the idea of going into a season with Monty and a rookie at the position. Anything more than $2 million should be a no.

Tretter is going to be gone. Another team will overpay for him. I'd just much rather have the Pack put a bigger price tag on Lang as well.

Barclay is a career back-up. Worth the thought of keeping him for very little money.

Datone has been a very underwhelming player. I don't think he is worth the re-sign when we can get the same production out of players like Frackrell or Elliot.

Peppers gas tank is near empty. He didn't add much to the defense when he was playing situational downs. Not worth the money any longer.

Michael doesn't fit in with this scheme. He had one good run against Chicago and had a multitude of mental errors, which was also an issue with the other teams he was cut from. Not a very bright player and that is a big no-no in this offense that requires the RB to be so good at pass protection/blitz pick-up.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
7 years ago
Datone has had only one year standing up, and he looked pretty decent, all things considered. I make him an offer. He's still ascending as an OLB.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
beast (2m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (3m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (13m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (25m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (34m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (55m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.