GermanGilbert
15 years ago



The same reason we are spending millions on AK, Barnett, Hawk and the rest of our defense. Does anyone on our defense have 3-4 experience? I don't see Peppers in Green Bay it's to big of a name for Ted Thompson to actually get.

"dhazer" wrote:



the packers paid these guys millions of dollars considering they play a 4-3.

@pib

maybe he would be a top-5 pick, but even a top-5 pick don't get a contract half the worth peppers is demanding. i don't know what my hometown has to do with this stuff either 😉
blank
dhazer
15 years ago
he guaranteed money is $22.5 million.

six years for $51 million.


Thats what the #5 pick in the draft got last year.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
I don't know how to explain it, but I think I would rather pay Orakpo to play our OLB spot than Peppers...

And he'll be with us longer than Peppers, and when we are lined up in a 4-3, Orakpo will still be a beast, after all that is what he played in college for the most part.
UserPostedImage
INDUCEDCOMA
15 years ago

So we've heard this already and also Joe at PC.com  is saying something similar.

Packers Get
[ul]Julius Peppers
Panthers 59th overall selection[/ul]

Panthers Get
[ul]Brian Brohm
Al Harris
Brady Poppinga
Packers 9th overall selection[/ul]



Also Joe mentions this one which I have not heard prior to this.

Packers Get
[ul] Tony Gonzalez
Chiefs 3rd overall selection[/ul]

Chiefs Get
[ul]Al Harris
Packers 9th overall selection
Packers 9th selection in 3rd round
Packers 19th selection in 3rd round[/ul]


The Panthers rumor is for more plausible than the one with the Chiefs. I don't see anyone in the draft that could be an immediate blockbuster player for us and that is against Ted Thompson methods completely.








What do YOU think about these?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


I think Peppers coming to the packers could happen, but there has to be certain things that need to go there way.
1. Packers would give there number one pick (9)
2. Panthers would have to give something in return like a third or fourth round pick back.
3. Packers will give a 2010 second round pick.

Panther really don't have the money for Peppers, there cap money is not the greatest.
Trade scenario - Many things could happen Al Harris is a good one.
Qb, Lb, Plus 1st round pick
When you draft a player who has never played a down in the NFL.
Ted take the trade and get Peppers or Gonzalez. Ted you get a pro bowl player and a leader...
blank
PackerTraxx
15 years ago
Maybe Ted will wait until after the draft and then give a #1 for Peppers and a #2 for Gonzales. Those picks would be somewhat lower than this year - hopefully. JOT
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Stevetarded
15 years ago
losing al harris for either of those guys would be a mistake.
blank
warhawk
15 years ago

losing al harris for either of those guys would be a mistake.

"Stevetarded" wrote:




What I see as the big problem is Peppers BETTER be good and put us over the top if we sign him. By the time we pay Jennings, Collins, Kampman, etc. and deal with the ones out of the nine we have coming up next year there will be VERY LITTLE room to do much of anything else to improve the team.

This move puts a lot of eggs in one basket in terms of other possible moves that might become necessary depending on how the year goes defensively under Capers.

If we knew for sure the guys we have can get us over the top it would be a different story. I know you can always find a way to sign a player and stay under the cap but that doesn't mean you won't lose the flexibility of having the Cap right to do what is necessary down the road.

A $16 mil salary can take away alot of flexibility and options so like I say he better be darn good and make a lot of guys around him better as well.
"The train is leaving the station."
15 years ago
i would crap myself if either happened (i mean that in a bad way, fyi).

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


doddpower
15 years ago

losing al harris for either of those guys would be a mistake.

"warhawk" wrote:




What I see as the big problem is Peppers BETTER be good and put us over the top if we sign him. By the time we pay Jennings, Collins, Kampman, etc. and deal with the ones out of the nine we have coming up next year there will be VERY LITTLE room to do much of anything else to improve the team.

This move puts a lot of eggs in one basket in terms of other possible moves that might become necessary depending on how the year goes defensively under Capers.

If we knew for sure the guys we have can get us over the top it would be a different story. I know you can always find a way to sign a player and stay under the cap but that doesn't mean you won't lose the flexibility of having the Cap right to do what is necessary down the road.

A $16 mil salary can take away alot of flexibility and options so like I say he better be darn good and make a lot of guys around him better as well.

"Stevetarded" wrote:



I don't think it affects things as much as you might think. Frontload at least one of their contracts this year (maybe even two of them) and next year they wouldn't be taking such a big hit. Structure the other two or so to where they take us close to the cap next year, but not over it and after next year we could be very well back to the same area we are now, or at least sufficiently under the cap.

I guess it's just all a matter of how the contracts would be structured. There's no reason signing one big free agent and having to resign a couple of our own players would restrict us from "improving" the team in the future, especially at the rate Ted Thompson signs free agents. Let's just say if we would have signed a big named free agent in the past two years. Well, by this point or next year, if the contract was structured carefully, their cap hit likely wouldn't be that bad, or at least manageable. It would take careful planning no doubt, but that's what these people get paid for.

This isn't even a post in favor of Peppers necessarily, but I'm just saying that if Ted (or any GM in our position) really wanted a player that would cost as much as Peppers, he or she could get him and resign the players and rookies we need to resign / sign.

Doesn't matter though, I don't expect anything like this to happen this year, and it's likely to be a whole new scenario in the coming years anyway; one where getting a big time free agent will be IMPOSSIBLE instead of just costly.
bozz_2006
15 years ago

i would crap myself if either happened (i mean that in a bad way, fyi).

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



I'm curious as to how crapping yourself could possibly be meant in a good way. Are there situations where crapping oneself is good? I've crapped myself a few times that I can remember, and none of them have been good.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (16h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
    Martha Careful (16h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Rude!
    beast (20h) : Martha? 😋
    Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
    dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
    beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.