uffda udfa
8 years ago

You really don't remember the ridiculous number of yards the defense gave up which was masked by the high number of turnovers? Because at least the last several weeks that's how they're playing.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



I think you're recalling 2011 not 2010. Our 2010 defense was highly rated. Our 2011 D set a record for passing yards given up in the history of the NFL, if I recall correctly.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Porforis
8 years ago

I think you're recalling 2011 not 2010. Our 2010 defense was highly rated. Our 2011 D set a record for passing yards given up in the history of the NFL, if I recall correctly.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Boy howdy, you're right. I'm getting too old! 😒
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Packers came back to DOMINATE?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



It's fascinating how you ignore the whole context and premise of a statement, yank one single word and just ramble interestingly on and on about it making no sense whatsoever. Great work!

What I know is Packers have a HOME PLAYOFF game and that is fucking awesome! Get behind YOUR team or get the fuck out of the way!! lol


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

It's fascinating how you ignore the whole context and premise of a statement, yank one single word and just ramble interestingly on and on about it making no sense whatsoever. Great work!

What I know is Packers have a HOME PLAYOFF game and that is fucking awesome! Get behind YOUR team or get the fuck out of the way!! lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Just parsed your statement that isn't blanket for this team. The defense did not dominate. Adam freaking Thielen put over 200 yards on this defense. That Viking O which is among the worst in the NFL blistered our D. I'm just trying to put a little balance to the word dominate. We didn't dominate. Rodgers woke up...end of story.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Just parsed your statement that isn't blanket for this team.The defense did not dominate.Adam freaking Thielen put over 200 yards on this defense.That Viking O which is among the worst in the NFL blistered our D.I'm just trying to put a little balance to the word dominate.We didn't dominate.Rodgers woke up...end of story.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You're right, we absolutely do not have a dominating defense.

Buuuuuuut, the Packers defense has 3 more take-aways than any other tea in the NFL over the last four games played. Fascinating!

Packers 13
Panthers 10
Patriots 10

Oh snap!
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

You're right, we absolutely do not have a dominating defense.

Buuuuuuut, the Packers defense has 3 more take-aways than any other tea in the NFL over the last four games played. Fascinating!

Packers 13
Panthers 10
Patriots 10

Oh snap!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



...but...WHY do we have them? Could it be the lousy QB's we faced? Stafford was injured.

If defense wins championships like most of you believe you wouldn't be excited in the least for our chances, yet, you are? Why? That is the difference in how we are as fans of this team. I don't skew things or try to make things into things I wish them to be. This D is terrible. Rodgers has been stellar lately. He needs to stay stellar, which isn't his track record in the playoffs, and our D needs to be better, which isn't it's track record, either. Perhaps, Ol' Julius gets fired up as this is his last chance and plays out of his mind. That is something to hope for but this D is not good. You know that. We faced bad teams or injured QB's...you know that, too. Why are you blasting me for telling the truth? Is it because that's just not fun? What have I said that isn't true since I posted last night? It's all true. You can ignore it or spin it or whatever but it's still true.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
8 years ago

Eliot or Brian would want their own HC and we can finally wave buh bye to our highly successful coach and great DC.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your ability to assume wrongly is just amazing... even more amazing is your ability to continually wrongly state it like it's a fact.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

...but...WHY do we have them? Could it be the lousy QB's we faced? Stafford was injured.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Sam Bradford just set the NFL ALL TIME record in completion percentage.
Russell Wilson was I think top five in QB rating
Matthew Stafford was spoken as a MVP candidate
Carson Wentz was anointed Joe Montana lol Sorry



Three of the QB's were not lousy. Yes, Matt Barkley and Brock Osweiler are LOUSY, no argument, but the other four are not and were not lousy. Again, you degrade the Packers when you should recognize and respect the opposing teams talent. It's like you don't even watch the games or have any insight from what else is happening in the NFL. Which is cool, that is perfectly cool. I just think it's a narrow window to make such broad judgments upon.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
8 years ago
This is FANTASTIC!
Great reading !
I've missed THE OLD UFFDA SPIN!
Completely ignoring the subject of a thread,pretending to actually care about what The Packers do, when all he wants to do is bash Ted Thompson, Mike McCarthy and the whole Packer organization.

DAMN BARFARN I'M REALLY SURPRISED YOU HAVEN'T JUMPED IN HERE AND PUT A STOP TO HIS NONSENSE.

It's your thread Uffda has hijacked!

Really Dissapointed in you Barfarn!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
8 years ago

Sam Bradford just set the NFL ALL TIME record in completion percentage.
Russell Wilson was I think top five in QB rating
Matthew Stafford was spoken as a MVP candidate
Carson Wentz was anointed Joe Montana lol Sorry



Three of the QB's were not lousy. Yes, Matt Barkley and Brock Osweiler are LOUSY, no argument, but the other four are not and were not lousy. Again, you degrade the Packers when you should recognize and respect the opposing teams talent. It's like you don't even watch the games or have any insight from what else is happening in the NFL. Which is cool, that is perfectly cool. I just think it's a narrow window to make such broad judgments upon.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




What? Look at the game Russell played on the road prior to Lambeau. Didn't play well at all in Tampa. He's not the same on the road.

Stafford an MVP candidate? Yeah, for the Lions team not the NFL.

Wentz was an up and down rookie. Look at Peyton Manning's rookie season or Troy Aikman. Not good. Easy turnovers. Dom's defense confuses most rookies and Russell Wilson for some reason.

I don't have to degrade the Packers. I just comment on their defense which is LOUSY. It's not? You post some turnover stat to avoid commenting on it's ineptness. Toasted cheese, I tell ya. Little pass rush and a bad secondary is not a recipe for a deep playoff run. It was barely enough to overtake Detroit for the division. That's embarrassing. We almost lost the division back to back to Minnesota and Detroit.

Were we not the favorite to win it all before the season? Were we not favored to win all our games before the season? How is 10-6 not a disgrace given the expectations? Eeking into the division title is a proud accomplishment?

The O has been very good. I'm happy to see Rodgers playing like Rodgers used to play not as he'd been for 1.5 years.

You are one of the defense wins crowd. How do you justify any enthusiasm for this playoff run given our defense? These are simple honest questions that should be answered and haven't been.

No comment on Ted letting Casey go because he spent a 1st and 2nd on two CB's who can't play in the NFL? That's 3 brutal moves that have crippled this D. That's just the recent ones.

You can be happy about a home playoff game. Even our HC who you love said the goal in Green Bay is to win CHAMPIONSHIPS. Not divisional...WORLD'S. Failure is not doing that. I know you can't win it every year but to be as far away as we have for all of Rodgers tenure save for the one we won is disappointing and something should've been done when the stink and the linc took place.

EDIT: I neglected to comment on Sam Bradford. So, Sam had a great year because of his completion %? Again, the nuance is lost. What was his YPP? You could set the NFL record throwing them as short as he was. No downfield game save for when he played the Packers. He ripped us with Diggs in his first game as a starter in Minnesota and later with You've lost that lovin' Thielen at Lambeau. Bradford didn't have a great year and is not a great QB. Vikes gave up high picks for him. I wouldn't have given up a 3rd for that guy and they gave up a one and two, I believe.

The lousy QB, Barkley, that even you agree is lousy TORCHED our D. Bodes well for a long playoff run doesn't it?
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (6h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (7h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (7h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (8h) : Who? What?
beast (16h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21h) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.