Porforis
8 years ago

Saying he's better than a guy that 3 teams didn't even think was worth rostering as a back up is not acting like he's a franchise QB.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



I'm not referencing that, I'm referencing people that say we should ship Aaron Rodgers off in the offseason and start Huntley.
Barfarn
8 years ago

Saying he's better than a guy that 3 teams didn't even think was worth rostering as a back up is not acting like he's a franchise QB.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 




There are 2 shoe salesmen sent to remote backward island. Salesmen #1 calls his office and says, “get me outta here now, not a single person here wears shoes.” Salesman #2 calls his office and says, “send me every shoe ya got, not a single person here is wearing any.”

Steve is salesman #1

I’m Salesman #2; the fact that a UDFA D3 Qb was rostered by 2 other teams is an amazing, maybe an unprecedented, compliment to the work Callahan put on film in PS. Everyone knows he ain’t ready, yet 2 other teams used a valuable roster spot believing he’s a better emergency option than Freeman, Jackson Flynn, Vick, Whitehurst, Yates, Lindley, Claussen; etc.

Callahan growth in year #1 is special; if it continues he’ll be special.

I'm not referencing that, I'm referencing people that say we should ship Aaron Rodgers off in the offseason and start Huntley.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



GB wont be shipping Rodgers because Hundley is a franchise QB. They'll ship Rodgers because the team will be better. Hundley at QB executing the offense like a man, reduced disturbances to morale and lockerroom comraderee, while at the same time picking up valuable picks and saving about 55Million over the next 3 years.

Russell Wilson [when they won] and Dak Prescott are not "franchise QBs." They just did/do their job without all the kiddy crap drama. That is what Hundley will bring in 2017.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

There are 2 shoe salesmen sent to remote backward island. Salesmen #1 calls his office and says, “get me outta here now, not a single person here wears shoes.” Salesman #2 calls his office and says, “send me every shoe ya got, not a single person here is wearing any.”

Steve is salesman #1

I’m Salesman #2; the fact that a UDFA D3 Qb was rostered by 2 other teams is an amazing, maybe an unprecedented, compliment to the work Callahan put on film in PS. Everyone knows he ain’t ready, yet 2 other teams used a valuable roster spot believing he’s a better emergency option than Freeman, Jackson Flynn, Vick, Whitehurst, Yates, Lindley, Claussen; etc.

Callahan growth in year #1 is special; if it continues he’ll be special.



GB wont be shipping Rodgers because Hundley is a franchise QB. They'll ship Rodgers because the team will be better. Hundley at QB executing the offense like a man, reduced disturbances to morale and lockerroom comraderee, while at the same time picking up valuable picks and saving about 55Million over the next 3 years.

Russell Wilson [when they won] and Dak Prescott are not "franchise QBs." They just did/do their job without all the kiddy crap drama. That is what Hundley will bring in 2017.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 




The only problem is, salesman #2, no one wants to buy what you are selling. 😝

UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago

There are 2 shoe salesmen sent to remote backward island. Salesmen #1 calls his office and says, “get me outta here now, not a single person here wears shoes.” Salesman #2 calls his office and says, “send me every shoe ya got, not a single person here is wearing any.”

Steve is salesman #1

I’m Salesman #2; the fact that a UDFA D3 Qb was rostered by 2 other teams is an amazing, maybe an unprecedented, compliment to the work Callahan put on film in PS. Everyone knows he ain’t ready, yet 2 other teams used a valuable roster spot believing he’s a better emergency option than Freeman, Jackson Flynn, Vick, Whitehurst, Yates, Lindley, Claussen; etc.

Callahan growth in year #1 is special; if it continues he’ll be special.



GB wont be shipping Rodgers because Hundley is a franchise QB. They'll ship Rodgers because the team will be better. Hundley at QB executing the offense like a man, reduced disturbances to morale and lockerroom comraderee, while at the same time picking up valuable picks and saving about 55Million over the next 3 years.

Russell Wilson [when they won] and Dak Prescott are not "franchise QBs." They just did/do their job without all the kiddy crap drama. That is what Hundley will bring in 2017.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



The teams liked him on film then promptly cut him as soon as they saw him in person. I don't think I'd consider that a positive. As I said I like him as a prospect on the practice squad I just never thought he was worth getting in a fuss over when he got cut/claimed.
The_Green_Ninja
8 years ago

GB wont be shipping Rodgers because Hundley is a franchise QB. They'll ship Rodgers because the team will be better. Hundley at QB executing the offense like a man, reduced disturbances to morale and lockerroom comraderee, while at the same time picking up valuable picks and saving about 55Million over the next 3 years.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Is this a parody or an actual real thing someone thinks is a good idea?


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

Is this a parody or an actual real thing someone thinks is a good idea?

Originally Posted by: The_Green_Ninja 



Sad isn't it?
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
8 years ago

Sad isn't it?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I didn't even experience the 70s and 80s and I know that this type of thinking is just stupid.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
8 years ago

Is this a parody or an actual real thing someone thinks is a good idea?

Originally Posted by: The_Green_Ninja 



I think you question is rhetorical 😂. But Rodgers is in the EXACT same spot was Crosby was a few years ago. If they're not pretty sure Rodgers will cease being headcase doppleganger same ole Jay from late 2015 and most of 2016; he will not be QBing in GB in 2017. This is an unconvertible fact.
Barfarn
8 years ago

The teams liked him on film then promptly cut him as soon as they saw him in person. I don't think I'd consider that a positive. As I said I like him as a prospect on the practice squad I just never thought he was worth getting in a fuss over when he got cut/claimed.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



POPPYCOCK!
When teams snatch a Callahan type, the goal is to expose him to your program, hope he feels blocked or is otherwise unhappy with GB, you cut him and hope he chooses your P-squad. Though the Browns also probably saw him as an emergency option at the moment they signed him.

It is nonsense to read negativity into Callahan’s little road trip.

Saints had no QBs on injury report, cut an OT, and signed Callahan for one week…ONE WEEK! How many snaps and coaching time do you think Callahan got? [Answer=ZERO and a little]. Saints had 6 hours of practice to get Brees and McCown ready. It is absurd to think that they signed a D3 UDFA rookie, who had to learn a completely new offense and terminology, who got little to no 1 on 1 coaching and they cut him because he didn’t show enough…ABSURD.

When Browns claimed Callahan, they had 3 QBs on roster with injuries to top 2 [Kessler (Concussion) and McCown (Shoulder)]. #3 was Hogan, who was a Chiefs’ 5th round pick in 2016, and Browns pilfered him keeping him as #4 QB on roster behind [RG3, McCown, Kessler, who was a Browns 3rd rnd pick and started 8 games)]. Callahan was there for 5 weeks and was cut because Browns got RG3 back from IR-DTR. In weeks 2-5, Callahan was QB#4 as all QBs were healthy.

Now with McCown, #2 pick RG3, 3rd and 5th rounders Kessler and Hogan, which is a plethora of young talent, why did Callahan last 5 weeks as #4 QB on Browns’ roster? Answer: THEY WERE IMPRESSED; but ultimately, they were unwilling to keep 5 QBs on roster. The Browns stink and could grab any player from anyone's P-squad, and Callahan was more attractive than any of those 310 options.

There is NOTHING Callahan had an opportunity to do in NO and CLEV that would nullify his tape.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

I think you question is rhetorical 😂. But Rodgers is in the EXACT same spot was Crosby was a few years ago. If they're not pretty sure Rodgers will cease being headcase doppleganger same ole Jay from late 2015 and most of 2016; he will not be QBing in GB in 2017. This is an unconvertible fact.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Mason Crosby wasn't in the top 3 in TD's, Yards and passer rating since Week 7 or at any point. Stop. Just stop already. You know you're absurd for the sake of shock value. We all see through it. Just, enough already lol
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.