FA Signings and Related News...· Page 6

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

That would give them a great OT and a defensive player in the 1st round. However, Warner will be 38 when the season start, does he really want to go to a team that went 0-16 last year?

If the Vikings hadn't traded for Sage, I would've pointed them out as the perfect landing spot for him, especially if they got/get TJ aswell. The Panthers would be a very good team with Warner on them, but I think he'd be to expensive, even if they release Delhomme.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#52

DT Cole picks Seahawks over returning to Packers

One of the Green Bay Packers big offseason priorities was to re-sign DT Colin Cole. But early Sunday morning, Cole wound up signing a five-year contract with the Seattle Seahawks, following the same path that former Packers coach Mike Holmgren once did.

Well, I must admit, I don't care a whole lot about that and I never saw it as a big priority to re-sign Cole.

Cutler seems to be quite pissed about his trading news though. Would be something if they lost him now there's no way they can get Cassel. Who'd they go with? Ramsey?

Packers_Finland
Registered

15 years ago

#53

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Pat Kirwan ranked Colin Cole as somewhere in the regions of 5-10 when ranking free agents for this year. Now Seahawks think they have a beast in the D-line. Haha, they don't even know what they're in for.

This is a placeholder

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#54

Could the rich get richer?

Patriots | Could be interested in Lewis
Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:41:29 -0800

Jamison Hensley, of The Baltimore Sun, reports the New England Patriots could be interested in unrestricted free-agent LB Ray Lewis (Ravens).

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#55

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I can see Cole being good...I don't think he'll just be a push over.

Oh, and by the way, why do the Broncos WANT to trade Cutler? That's RETARDED!!

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#56

Texans add ex-Lions QB Orlovsky as backup for starter Schaub

Associated Press

HOUSTON -- Dan Orlovsky didn't want to be the Detroit Lions' backup quarterback. Now he's the backup for the Houston Texans.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d80f04cfe&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true

AJistheHawk50
Registered

15 years ago

#57

"go.pack.go." wrote:

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I can see Cole being good...I don't think he'll just be a push over.

Oh, and by the way, why do the Broncos WANT to trade Cutler? That's RETARDED!!

its actally pretty complicated this problem between cutler and the broncos. he found out that they were dealing for cassel and he was very very upset. now that this happened he is refusing to talk to like the GM and he thinks they are still trying to deal hinm away. I love cutler personally and think hes great,

blank

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#58

Well why would they even go after Cassel in the first place? They already had Cutler.

AJistheHawk50
Registered

15 years ago

#59

excactly my point my friend. but also keep in mind cutler was pissed to shit when shanahan was let go and the new GM/Coach dnt know their names aren't "married" to cutler like shanahan was. so could they feel threatened by cutler because of his love for shanahan?

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#60

Well why would they even go after Cassel in the first place? They already had Cutler.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I heard that Cutler actually asked to be traded a few weeks prior.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (25m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (27m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (38m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (3h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (3h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (3h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (3h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS