It seems like every year fans worry about a log jam at WR... and it seems like the log jam is always over rated in fans minds. Fans always seem to talk about how the last Packers WR cut will be claimed ASAP... and they haven't been...
Is the log jam of Nelson and Cobb, really more impressive than the log jam of Charles Woodson, Al Harris and Tramon Williams? I might say the CBs are more impressive on that one.
Yes there are other WRs, but have they stepped up and proven enough to be considered logs? I feel like if I add them to Nelson and Cobb, that would just hurt their case against the CBs, because all of the CBs have proven to be starter worthy, while none of the other WRs have.
Originally Posted by: beast