wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Packers might have to consider keeping seven receivers

Continue Reading @ ESPN 

ESPN wrote:



While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
9 years ago
Well we had 2 FB and like 3 TEs last year. I don't see a problem going with 1 FB and/or 2 TE to make room somewhere else. Our bottom of roster WRs mostly all can contribute on ST too.
nerdmann
9 years ago

While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Ted will keep the best 53. He's kept 5 TEs before. He also kept 3FBs that time.

Key to making this roster is versatility, especially with ST.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Rob needs to stop pilfering our topics and get pull a unique thought from his ass. Besides, we already know the answer to this question as we have the final 53 roster already leaked to the public!

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t24824-2016-Ted-Thompson-s-53-cheat-sheet-right-here 
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

The likelihood of WR #7 being a better player than the other final 24th, 25th or 26th man on the offense is pretty remote. Not to mention that he would most likely be inactive most weeks. It is just as easy to stash him on the PS.

I'm not convinced GB won't go with only 5 WR's.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
9 years ago

Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

The likelihood of WR #7 being a better player than the other final 24th, 25th or 26th man on the offense is pretty remote. Not to mention that he would most likely be inactive most weeks. It is just as easy to stash him on the PS.

I'm not convinced GB won't go with only 5 WR's.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I can easily see Abbraderis or Davis being a better player than whoever is our 3rd TE (perillo?) or 3rd RB (Crockett?). If they were thinking about keeping an extra OL like Barclay or Josh Walker, I'd easily rather hang onto one of the WRs. We also don't really need to keep 3 QBs on the roster this year either as the quality of our 3rd QB is really no better than any street QB we could get at any time. There is always the chance of a UDFA surprising us at some other position on the offense but barring that and knowing what we currently know about the players 7wr just doesn't seem like a wild idea to me.
DakotaT
9 years ago

Rob needs to stop pilfering our topics and get pull a unique thought from his ass. Besides, we already know the answer to this question as we have the final 53 roster already leaked to the public!

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t24824-2016-Ted-Thompson-s-53-cheat-sheet-right-here 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



God damn right. We we want a sports writers opinion - we'll give it to him. We have a lot of educated fans posting here.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Why would you say it's not possible the Packers keep 7 WR? They kept 5 TE's at one point, didn't they? If they feel they can hide an OL or TE on practice squad, they'll do that rather than chance losing out on one of the 7 beast WR they have. Aaron Rodgers needs weapons to be elite.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

Why would you say it's not possible the Packers keep 7 WR? They kept 5 TE's at one point, didn't they? If they feel they can hide an OL or TE on practice squad, they'll do that rather than chance losing out on one of the 7 beast WR they have. Aaron Rodgers needs weapons to be elite.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



They could always list Monty as a HB or something.

Either way, someone will very likely get hurt at some point.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
9 years ago

They could always list Monty as a HB or something.

Either way, someone will very likely get hurt at some point.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



You stIle my two point's Nerdmann, so I'm not giving you an applaud.

Monty and Jordy did just have some major injuries, and Abby has a history. Even though I think the possibility of 7 exists, I sense it won't even be an issue by Jacksonville.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (3h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (12h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (12h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (13h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (13h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (14h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (15h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (15h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (17h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (19h) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

8h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.