wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

Packers might have to consider keeping seven receivers

Continue Reading @ ESPN 

ESPN wrote:



While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago
Well we had 2 FB and like 3 TEs last year. I don't see a problem going with 1 FB and/or 2 TE to make room somewhere else. Our bottom of roster WRs mostly all can contribute on ST too.
nerdmann
8 years ago

While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Ted will keep the best 53. He's kept 5 TEs before. He also kept 3FBs that time.

Key to making this roster is versatility, especially with ST.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

While I respect Rob's opinion. I can't imagine GB keeping 7 WRs.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Rob needs to stop pilfering our topics and get pull a unique thought from his ass. Besides, we already know the answer to this question as we have the final 53 roster already leaked to the public!

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t24824-2016-Ted-Thompson-s-53-cheat-sheet-right-here 
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

The likelihood of WR #7 being a better player than the other final 24th, 25th or 26th man on the offense is pretty remote. Not to mention that he would most likely be inactive most weeks. It is just as easy to stash him on the PS.

I'm not convinced GB won't go with only 5 WR's.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago

Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

The likelihood of WR #7 being a better player than the other final 24th, 25th or 26th man on the offense is pretty remote. Not to mention that he would most likely be inactive most weeks. It is just as easy to stash him on the PS.

I'm not convinced GB won't go with only 5 WR's.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I can easily see Abbraderis or Davis being a better player than whoever is our 3rd TE (perillo?) or 3rd RB (Crockett?). If they were thinking about keeping an extra OL like Barclay or Josh Walker, I'd easily rather hang onto one of the WRs. We also don't really need to keep 3 QBs on the roster this year either as the quality of our 3rd QB is really no better than any street QB we could get at any time. There is always the chance of a UDFA surprising us at some other position on the offense but barring that and knowing what we currently know about the players 7wr just doesn't seem like a wild idea to me.
DakotaT
8 years ago

Rob needs to stop pilfering our topics and get pull a unique thought from his ass. Besides, we already know the answer to this question as we have the final 53 roster already leaked to the public!

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t24824-2016-Ted-Thompson-s-53-cheat-sheet-right-here 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



God damn right. We we want a sports writers opinion - we'll give it to him. We have a lot of educated fans posting here.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Guys I never said it was impossible. I said I can't imagine it happening.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Why would you say it's not possible the Packers keep 7 WR? They kept 5 TE's at one point, didn't they? If they feel they can hide an OL or TE on practice squad, they'll do that rather than chance losing out on one of the 7 beast WR they have. Aaron Rodgers needs weapons to be elite.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
8 years ago

Why would you say it's not possible the Packers keep 7 WR? They kept 5 TE's at one point, didn't they? If they feel they can hide an OL or TE on practice squad, they'll do that rather than chance losing out on one of the 7 beast WR they have. Aaron Rodgers needs weapons to be elite.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



They could always list Monty as a HB or something.

Either way, someone will very likely get hurt at some point.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
8 years ago

They could always list Monty as a HB or something.

Either way, someone will very likely get hurt at some point.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



You stIle my two point's Nerdmann, so I'm not giving you an applaud.

Monty and Jordy did just have some major injuries, and Abby has a history. Even though I think the possibility of 7 exists, I sense it won't even be an issue by Jacksonville.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (3h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (3h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (10h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (12h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (12h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (14h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.