Jared Cook or Vernon Davis: Who would you have picked for Packers?

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

Jared Cook or Vernon Davis: Who would you have picked for Packers?

Continue Reading @ ESPN

ESPN wrote:

Jared Cook all the way.

He's younger, I still view Vernon as a bit of a head case. Not sure what Davis has left either.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

8 years ago

It is a tough question. Looking to the future it is definitely Cook based on potential. If you ask the question who would you rather have on a one-year deal it might be Davis. I don't like the 1 year deal with Cook as it means we still have to look at a TE fairly high, but the guy will not get many reps and there is still the chance we sign Cook long term so we end up with a crowded TE corps with people being under-utilized.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

8 years ago

Jared Cook is not as fast as Vernon Davis, but he is a better blocker per what the experts have stated. Also, Vernon Davis just got a ring didn't he? I'm guessing he's going to be less hungry for his 2nd ring than Cook is for his 1st ring.

The decision is an easy one, Jared Cook. He has more upside, younger, better player and I believe is more hungry to win and also has incentive to produce for a big contract. And there is also the fact that the Packers have him so I might be a little homer on it too.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Always go toward youth on decisions like this, for sure.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

sschind
Senior Member

8 years ago

Cook all the way.

steveishere
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Vernon Davis is done. I would rather have Richard Rodgers starting than waste a snap on Davis. The answer is Cook by default.

DakotaT
Select Member

8 years ago

Why wasn't both an option? It's not like we're stacked at the position or anything.

wpr
Preferred Member

8 years ago

Why wasn't both an option? It's not like we're stacked at the position or anything.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Because Uncle Teddy will not spend $6 million on the TE position.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

Why wasn't both an option? It's not like we're stacked at the position or anything.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Backman and Henry have more upside. 👍

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#10

I think we see from last year that even when you appear to be stacked, you are only a couple injuries away from the position being an immediate need again.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

buckeyepackfan (2h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (2h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (4h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (5h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (8h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (8h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (8h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (8h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (9h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (9h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (9h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (9h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (10h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (10h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (12h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (20h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (21h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS