Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
AR was MVP-like the first 6 games and Adams missed all but one of them; the rest of the time Adams’ QB was some stooge that was the 30th rated QB in the league. If MVP Rodgers played the entire year Adams misses most of 5 games; but still gets 65-75 catches for 8-900 yards.

Example: Adams’ worst game was T’giving v. Bears: 11 targets, 2 catches, 14 yards, 1 drop, one target INT . But, if AR was an MVP, Adams’ stat line would have read 9 targets, 7 catches, 68 yards [At least], 1 TD, 1 Drop and no INTs. And if AR would have delivered the dropped pass on time, Adams may have had another catch for 15 yards.

Here’s the 11 targets:

1st Q; 11:39. Adams in slot does that 0-line out; slot CB hits him at Line of scrimmage; Adams breaks tackle and goes for 6 yards.

1st Q; 9:19. Adams runs a go down right sideline, the CB is 10 Yards off LOS and in bail technique; there is no separation deep and there would not with anyone else either. AR throws the ball away beyond everyone. AR should have thrown to Cobb, who was wide open and undoubtedly the 2nd read with a 2 line dig route. The Bears blitzed 5, protection was just so so, the ends were closing and a push was coming up the middle; but there easily was time to make 2nd read and probably 3rd read, which was probably Perillo on a chip and leaking into shallow left flat. Should have been no throw.

1st Q; 8:41- Adams makes an out move and runs a perfect inside seem route creating about 5 yards of separation and then drops an almost perfect pass; this was definitely a “drop.” As usual, separation is not caused by speed. Separation typically occurs because the WR is able to make a move that will cause the CB to shift his weight in the wrong direction prematurely and then sensing that weight shift makes a cut. ELITE route runners have a sense to make this move at the perfect moment so as to create the separation at the place and moment that is timed to match when QB is to make his read on that WR for that play. Adams ran an ELITE route.

Nerd made a comment in another thread about AR’s timing could cause the drops and another seemed to disagree saying AR’s bad timing does not cause the ball to go thru Adams’ hands; it is a lack of concentration. But, Nerd is right, if the throw is not when and where expected Adams now starts thinking about his secondary move; this splits his concentration, which is no excuse for the drop, but is a contributing factor. On this play, AR was late with the throw, he ran out of pocket for no apparent reason and threw a bit of a wobbler late and off his back foot. AR is probably graded as 10% at fault for this INC by the staff.

2Q :08- It was end of half. At Bears 32, I have no idea what Adams route was; but there are 2 choices: a quick out to get a touch closer or a go route hoping the CB is sitting on the out. Adams didn’t look for short pass at all and ran a total half-assed go.

3Q 7:00- Adams runs another sweet 2 line dig. He dropped hips as if to fake the dig, and just as Porter dropped his weight [getting ready for the out] Adams kept running the dig. He had 2 yards of separation. AR's throw did not lead Adams enough forcing Adams to stop; when Adams stopped Porter ran right into him for PI that was not called. The ball hit Adams in the chest and Porter’s hit was not all that violent. Though not a “drop,” Adams should have made the catch. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 12 yards [and maybe turns up field and gets alot more]

3Q 6:46-Adams runs a WR screen sets up at about ½ yard past LOS; AR throws the ball 1 yard behind line and at Adams’ ankles. Adams dropped the ball, don’t think it was on purpose, but it should have been because his catching ball behind LOS with momentum moving backward ruined the play. That could have been a nice gain; but for the throw. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 8 yards [one broken tackle would have been 15 more].

4Q 8:50- Adams runs an 2 line out, he is wide open a good 2-3 yards of separation and AR throws off back foot and leads Adams so much he cant even dive for the ball. If a good throw Adams has a catch for 12 yards on the play.

4Q 3:23 Rodgers [slot] and Adams [outside] crossed. This play is designed to isolate the safety 1 on 1 with Adams when CB takes Rodgers in flat and Safety has to match w/ Adams. But Bears didn’t switch, the stayed man. Adams was “picked” by the safety racing to the flat to cover Rodgers and ball went right to Porter for INT. This ball should never have been thrown, with the safety in that spot. If the safety was looking for the ball he would have been the one with the INT. Should have been no throw.

4Q 2:45 Adams again ran another beautiful Dig route; has 3-4 yards separation and this time instead of throwing the ball behind Adams he led Adams to much who had to dive to get a finger tip on the ball. A good throw gets Adams 14 yards.

4Q 1:18 3rd and 7 at Chicago 16 down by 4 [the game is on the line] Adams runs a great route again pressuring Porter up field [would have had more separation if not at Chicago 16]. Adams clears yard to gain by 3 yards allowing him to come back and make the catch with a good hit by Porter for 8 yards.

4Q :29 4th and G down by 4. Adams has his guy on right hip; if AR throws to lower to left hip it’s a TD, instead he throw it high, not far enough left. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 8 yards and a TD and a win!
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
9 years ago
LOL

He starts at number 6 on the depth chart provided we don't draft more receivers.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
9 years ago

AR was MVP-like the first 6 games and Adams missed all but one of them; the rest of the time Adams’ QB was some stooge that was the 30th rated QB in the league. If MVP Rodgers played the entire year Adams misses most of 5 games; but still gets 65-75 catches for 8-900 yards.

Example: Adams’ worst game was T’giving v. Bears: 11 targets, 2 catches, 14 yards, 1 drop, one target INT . But, if Aaron Rodgers was an MVP, Adams’ stat line would have read 9 targets, 7 catches, 68 yards [At least], 1 TD, 1 Drop and no INTs. And if Aaron Rodgers would have delivered the dropped pass on time, Adams may have had another catch for 15 yards.

Here’s the 11 targets:

1st Q; 11:39. Adams in slot does that 0-line out; slot CB hits him at Line of scrimmage; Adams breaks tackle and goes for 6 yards.

1st Q; 9:19. Adams runs a go down right sideline, the CB is 10 Yards off LOS and in bail technique; there is no separation deep and there would not with anyone else either. Aaron Rodgers throws the ball away beyond everyone. Aaron Rodgers should have thrown to Cobb, who was wide open and undoubtedly the 2nd read with a 2 line dig route. The Bears blitzed 5, protection was just so so, the ends were closing and a push was coming up the middle; but there easily was time to make 2nd read and probably 3rd read, which was probably Perillo on a chip and leaking into shallow left flat. Should have been no throw.

1st Q; 8:41- Adams makes an out move and runs a perfect inside seem route creating about 5 yards of separation and then drops an almost perfect pass; this was definitely a “drop.” As usual, separation is not caused by speed. Separation typically occurs because the WR is able to make a move that will cause the CB to shift his weight in the wrong direction prematurely and then sensing that weight shift makes a cut. ELITE route runners have a sense to make this move at the perfect moment so as to create the separation at the place and moment that is timed to match when QB is to make his read on that WR for that play. Adams ran an ELITE route.

Nerd made a comment in another thread about AR’s timing could cause the drops and another seemed to disagree saying AR’s bad timing does not cause the ball to go thru Adams’ hands; it is a lack of concentration. But, Nerd is right, if the throw is not when and where expected Adams now starts thinking about his secondary move; this splits his concentration, which is no excuse for the drop, but is a contributing factor. On this play, Aaron Rodgers was late with the throw, he ran out of pocket for no apparent reason and threw a bit of a wobbler late and off his back foot. Aaron Rodgers is probably graded as 10% at fault for this INC by the staff.

2Q :08- It was end of half. At Bears 32, I have no idea what Adams route was; but there are 2 choices: a quick out to get a touch closer or a go route hoping the CB is sitting on the out. Adams didn’t look for short pass at all and ran a total half-assed go.

3Q 7:00- Adams runs another sweet 2 line dig. He dropped hips as if to fake the dig, and just as Porter dropped his weight [getting ready for the out] Adams kept running the dig. He had 2 yards of separation. AR's throw did not lead Adams enough forcing Adams to stop; when Adams stopped Porter ran right into him for PI that was not called. The ball hit Adams in the chest and Porter’s hit was not all that violent. Though not a “drop,” Adams should have made the catch. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 12 yards [and maybe turns up field and gets alot more]

3Q 6:46-Adams runs a WR screen sets up at about ½ yard past LOS; Aaron Rodgers throws the ball 1 yard behind line and at Adams’ ankles. Adams dropped the ball, don’t think it was on purpose, but it should have been because his catching ball behind LOS with momentum moving backward ruined the play. That could have been a nice gain; but for the throw. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 8 yards [one broken tackle would have been 15 more].

4Q 8:50- Adams runs an 2 line out, he is wide open a good 2-3 yards of separation and Aaron Rodgers throws off back foot and leads Adams so much he cant even dive for the ball. If a good throw Adams has a catch for 12 yards on the play.

4Q 3:23 Rodgers [slot] and Adams [outside] crossed. This play is designed to isolate the safety 1 on 1 with Adams when CB takes Rodgers in flat and Safety has to match w/ Adams. But Bears didn’t switch, the stayed man. Adams was “picked” by the safety racing to the flat to cover Rodgers and ball went right to Porter for INT. This ball should never have been thrown, with the safety in that spot. If the safety was looking for the ball he would have been the one with the INT. Should have been no throw.

4Q 2:45 Adams again ran another beautiful Dig route; has 3-4 yards separation and this time instead of throwing the ball behind Adams he led Adams to much who had to dive to get a finger tip on the ball. A good throw gets Adams 14 yards.

4Q 1:18 3rd and 7 at Chicago 16 down by 4 [the game is on the line] Adams runs a great route again pressuring Porter up field [would have had more separation if not at Chicago 16]. Adams clears yard to gain by 3 yards allowing him to come back and make the catch with a good hit by Porter for 8 yards.

4Q :29 4th and G down by 4. Adams has his guy on right hip; if Aaron Rodgers throws to lower to left hip it’s a TD, instead he throw it high, not far enough left. If a good throw Adams gets a catch for 8 yards and a TD and a win!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Thanks for posting these.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
I don't know whether to laugh at your post, or cry for you because of your post.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
uffda udfa
9 years ago
So many things wrong with that 17 post. AR was not at an MVP level the first 6 games.

Ty Montgomery had more to do with our better showing than Adams ever did over first 6 games. 88 is the much better of the two and that's painfully obvious.

17 is the WR equivalent of DuJuan Harris at RB. Hype. No results.

Adams better than Greg Jennings? Lol. Yeah, the Dolphins version of Greg.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
9 years ago

So many things wrong with that 17 post. Aaron Rodgers was not at an MVP level the first 6 games.

Ty Montgomery had more to do with our better showing than Adams ever did over first 6 games. 88 is the much better of the two and that's painfully obvious.

17 is the WR equivalent of DuJuan Harris at RB. Hype. No results.

Adams better than Greg Jennings? Lol. Yeah, the Dolphins version of Greg.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



MOntgomery is more explosive.

Davante is a little bigger, more of a "go up and get it" type of guy. Runs better routes. Monty is kind of a hybrid. I'm starting to look at him and Cobb as those "Sproles" type of slash weapon type guys.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

Davante is a little bigger, more of a "go up and get it" type of guy. Runs better routes. Monty is kind of a hybrid. I'm starting to look at him and Cobb as those "Sproles" type of slash weapon type guys.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



What is this based on?

They are about the same weight, if you take height and jumping ability (combine numbers) they are equal. They are about the same in speed. I would see them more interchangeable in the offense where neither is going to have any specific type casting. Either of them being able to line up any WR position and running any type route.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
cheeseheads123
9 years ago
I guess i am one of the few who arent worried about Adams.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago
The only way Adams might be fine is in the physical sense. His ankle should be fine by OTAs.

He looked better than he was when Jordy, Randall and Eddie had it going. Might be a borderline 3 at best but think more like Dakota that he's the worst we have.

He wasn't just a failure in 2015...he was a monumental bust. When RR is the better of the two by a lot that speaks volumes to how bad Davante was last season.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

This team wasn't right all season but now we had MVP play that just evaporated because Davante got hurt?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



This is dishonest [See DSM IV and V].

The above analysis shows Adams ran one bad route; a couple of great ones; had a drop; is skilled at separation; failed to make 3 tough catches on three pretty bad throws; failed to get through or fight thru a pic to at least knock down a pass destined for an INT. You 'll find that when Jordy was younger he had games like this too. And Greg Jennings had a ton of games like this. Adams will be okay.

The above analysis is how the Staff will decide if Davante stays on the field-NOT BY USING STATS. He will get positive grades if he runs good routes and the QB misfires. He will get bad grades if he runs a bad or wrong route; then AR scrambles and hits Adams for a 65 yard TD. A good receiver is also expected to make some tough catches.

It is obvious you don't understand the game. Adams does not have control over his stats; so using stats [or other silly minutia] only to evaluate often leads to silly conclusions.

Example 1: Jumal Rolle gets cut; then get 3 INTs and Goodson gets 0; you conclude that you are smarter than TT, MM and the staff. I, of course, analyzed their respective play and pointed out to you that not only was Goodson better at mirroring the receiver; but he had more upside.

Example 2: Based on silly minutia for evaluating talent [a guy that plays safety in college cant play CB in NFL] you opined that Ted Thompson is an idiot for drafting Randall. I tired to get you to look at his play, you refused and were again WRONG.

hypothetical: CM3 on 4 plays is assigned to guard the TE; instead he blitzes. The result is one sack and the TE gets 3 catches for 45 yards and CM3 gets benched. of course, no one, including PFF, would know CM3's responsibility, so the poor schmuck closest to the play, maybe Burnett or Joe Thomas, gets blamed for the TE's catches. Then, you'd exclaim MM and idiot for benching a guy that gets 1 sack every 4 plays and keeps a fool that can't cover a TE on the field.

Now, like the blind squirrel that can stumble upon an acorn or the broken that is correct twice per day; sometimes the stats and silly minutia just coincidentally happen to coincide with a player's actual worth.

This good, bad, shades of gray thing is hard for the adolescent mind or caveman to grasp. But if you insist or are only able to put players in tiny little boxes, that is, defining them metaphorically using only one syllable; just state your opinion, move on and don't misrepresent the argument.
nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
9 years ago

What is this based on?

They are about the same weight, if you take height and jumping ability (combine numbers) they are equal. They are about the same in speed. I would see them more interchangeable in the offense where neither is going to have any specific type casting. Either of them being able to line up any WR position and running any type route.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Monty isn't a real WR. He's a slash guy. Davante is the total opposite, a little taller too.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

Monty isn't a real WR. He's a slash guy. Davante is the total opposite, a little taller too.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



a whole inch there.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Porforis
  • Porforis
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
9 years ago

Monty isn't a real WR. He's a slash guy. Davante is the total opposite, a little taller too.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I honestly don't think we've seen enough of Monty to know how he's going to pan out. If he progresses with his fundamentals, he could be a terror. If not, he could be a bust.
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I honestly don't think we've seen enough of Monty to know how he's going to pan out. If he progresses with his fundamentals, he could be a terror. If not, he could be a bust.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



That kid knew all the positions and was praised for his football intelligence and ability to run routes properly much like Greg Jennings was. To come in at WR and be counted on as he was is more than promising. It's reason to be Buck like and get all crazy excited. The guy is bright, built like a tank, football fast, but I wonder about his heart. Don't know enough about him to know. He was blasted for his inability to get back on the field. I have no idea how bad it was for him so I can't comment. We'll need to see a larger sample for that but it's clear this guy can change games and make a real impact.

It was obvious that Montgomery was the far better player last year and I see no way he isn't going forward. He was a first round pick, possibly a high one, had he come out a year sooner. Davante Adams played in some goofy offense ala Alex Green and put up gaudy numbers. Might not be 88 (Barfarn alert) but he scored a respectable 25 on the Wonderlic. Davante is not sudden. He's more of a plodder. No explosion. We see that with Richard Rodgers. Monty is much twitchier of an athlete. There's a reason Monty is a return guy and Davante is not.

Go back and research the junior campaign of Ty Montgomery. Ted did an excellent job finding a first round value in Round 3. I think he gets knocked because he wasn't as high of a pick as Davante. Derrick Mayes was a 2nd rounder and Antonio Freeman a 3rd. I see a scenario quite similar for their career paths with 88 being Freeman and 17 being Mayes. Shoot, Derrick was 56th overall and Davante 53rd. Freeman pick 90 and Ty 94th. Similar. Derrick was diddly and Antonio was quite a player for us right from the beginning as a returner and WR late in first year. Sad 88 didn't get his chance to play the full season and also sad Davante did as we would've been better served with Abby or Janis on the field more over his non producing carcass.







UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
9 years ago

That kid knew all the positions and was praised for his football intelligence and ability to run routes properly much like Greg Jennings was. To come in at WR and be counted on as he was is more than promising. It's reason to be Buck like and get all crazy excited. The guy is bright, built like a tank, football fast, but I wonder about his heart. Don't know enough about him to know. He was blasted for his inability to get back on the field. I have no idea how bad it was for him so I can't comment. We'll need to see a larger sample for that but it's clear this guy can change games and make a real impact.

It was obvious that Montgomery was the far better player last year and I see no way he isn't going forward. He was a first round pick, possibly a high one, had he come out a year sooner. Davante Adams played in some goofy offense ala Alex Green and put up gaudy numbers. Might not be 88 (Barfarn alert) but he scored a respectable 25 on the Wonderlic. Davante is not sudden. He's more of a plodder. No explosion. We see that with Richard Rodgers. Monty is much twitchier of an athlete. There's a reason Monty is a return guy and Davante is not.

Go back and research the junior campaign of Ty Montgomery. Ted did an excellent job finding a first round value in Round 3. I think he gets knocked because he wasn't as high of a pick as Davante. Derrick Mayes was a 2nd rounder and Antonio Freeman a 3rd. I see a scenario quite similar for their career paths with 88 being Freeman and 17 being Mayes. Shoot, Derrick was 56th overall and Davante 53rd. Freeman pick 90 and Ty 94th. Similar. Derrick was diddly and Antonio was quite a player for us right from the beginning as a returner and WR late in first year. Sad 88 didn't get his chance to play the full season and also sad Davante did as we would've been better served with Abby or Janis on the field more over his non producing carcass.






Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Not a tight route runner. Very explosive though.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Not a tight route runner. Very explosive though.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Good enough to earn Aaron's trust.

I found this interesting commentary from Mike McCarthy after we drafted Montgomery:


"Big plays is what you need to win in the National Football League, So, it's definitely a variable, one of the top variables, for winning championships. We will be better on kickoff return, and Ty will definitely have the opportunity to help us improve. "I think he's a heck of a young player, and we were fortunate to get him in the third round."

---Interesting... you need big plays to win in the NFL? We had very very few and the ones we did were either courtesy penalty or Jeff Janis. Janis has the thing that creates big plays...speed. What does 88 have? Explosiveness. I will continue pining for speed, speed, speed and gamebreakers as long as we continue to trot out what we've been trotting out. More deep threats. More homerun threats to pressure the opposing D. We have a RB when he's not looking like an ILB can really capitalize on less in the box because the D is terrified of not committing enough personnel to defend against the big play.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
9 years ago

Good enough to earn Aaron's trust.

I found this interesting commentary from Mike McCarthy after we drafted Montgomery:


"Big plays is what you need to win in the National Football League, So, it's definitely a variable, one of the top variables, for winning championships. We will be better on kickoff return, and Ty will definitely have the opportunity to help us improve. "I think he's a heck of a young player, and we were fortunate to get him in the third round."

---Interesting... you need big plays to win in the NFL? We had very very few and the ones we did were either courtesy penalty or Jeff Janis. Janis has the thing that creates big plays...speed. What does 88 have? Explosiveness. I will continue pining for speed, speed, speed and gamebreakers as long as we continue to trot out what we've been trotting out. More deep threats. More homerun threats to pressure the opposing D. We have a RB when he's not looking like an ILB can really capitalize on less in the box because the D is terrified of not committing enough personnel to defend against the big play.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Janis has had ONE good game. Ty has had consistent production during the time he was active.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Janis has had ONE good game. Ty has had consistent production during the time he was active.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



One good game? LOL. Did you not watch the San Diego game or roadie at MN? We lose both of those games if not for double J.

BTW, what player on our offense last year was the most capable of those big plays? Janis...but I could see going with Monty. Nobody else close.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Why am I not surprised a thread about DAVANTE ADAMS has somehow foolishly sparked a debate about JEFF JANIS.

I want to talk Adams, not Janis, in this ADAMS thread.

I really think the injury to Jordy Nelson did vastly more damage to Adams than good. He was thrust into a role he simply was not prepared nor equipped for. The heaping praise from fellow players and coaches I think applied too much pressure on him and he cracked like a China doll under a Uhaul truck. If Jordy doesn't go down, I bet Adams flourishes as we were all led to believe he would in the WR3 role.

That being said, I am not going to make the same mistake I did this time last year and believe Adams is going to take the next step. He had a few good games in 2014 and only one in 2015 that comes to mind. I'm willing to give him a 'pass' with the Sophomore slump excuse. If he doesn't produce at WR3 better than his first two seasons, I'm cool with letting him hit free agency after his contract is up.
UserPostedImage
68md
  • 68md
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Member
9 years ago

Why am I not surprised a thread about DAVANTE ADAMS has somehow foolishly sparked a debate about JEFF JANIS.

I want to talk Adams, not Janis, in this ADAMS thread.

I really think the injury to Jordy Nelson did vastly more damage to Adams than good. He was thrust into a role he simply was not prepared nor equipped for. The heaping praise from fellow players and coaches I think applied too much pressure on him and he cracked like a China doll under a Uhaul truck. If Jordy doesn't go down, I bet Adams flourishes as we were all led to believe he would in the WR3 role.

That being said, I am not going to make the same mistake I did this time last year and believe Adams is going to take the next step. He had a few good games in 2014 and only one in 2015 that comes to mind. I'm willing to give him a 'pass' with the Sophomore slump excuse. If he doesn't produce at WR3 better than his first two seasons, I'm cool with letting him hit free agency after his contract is up.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I agree with you Z to a point but as I pointed out in another thread that high ankle sprain didn't help nor did having almost no coaching in his sophomore season. Let's see what happens through camp. Wouldn't be surprised with Nelson back if Adams productions looks more like his rookie season.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : What the hell
beast (7h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (13h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (13h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (13h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.