bozz_2006
15 years ago
If I wanted a "mouth" as our GM, I'd get a pitch-man like
UserPostedImage

or
UserPostedImage


I'll stick with Ted.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

And yes i'm a Ted Thompson hater i admit it and i don't hide it, but that makes me a true packer fan and not a bandwagon fan.

"dhazer" wrote:



Yeah. That part there makes zero sense, dude. Not hating the GM makes me a bandwagon fan? How do you figure that?

To answer the question: This is really quite simple, at least on the face of the issue. People don't like Thompson because he's the GM of a professional sports franchise - other than someone like Wolfe, how many GMs can you name who are or were loved by their fan base? GMs are generally disliked because they're the ones who make the moves some fans hate or fail to make moves other fans want to see made. Sports fans in general A) think they know what's best for the team, and 2) Mistrust anyone who, per their estimation, is paid too much for a job that they feel they could do themselves. Take a poll of any random fanbase and ask them if the players for their favorite teams are overpaid - most will say Hell Yes.

So you're dealing with the psychology of the sports fan, here - what leads them to those beliefs is another, much longer story, but you can make the general statement that any team's GM is far more likely to be despised than loved.

Additional factors:

-Brett - this has been done to death, so I don't need to elaborate.

-Wolfe - Thompson took the place of one of the few GMs who WAS well-liked by the fan base (I'm aware that Mike was GM and HC for a period of time, but most casual fans don't connect him to that roll, and I know a number of Packers fans who thought Wolfe was still in that position while Mike was at the helm). That's not a recipe for success.

All the other stuff I could list could be listed for almost any GM; doesn't make a splash in FA, spends too much in FA unwisely, blah blah blah. There's not enough agreement within any fan base for a GM to make everyone happy. Can't be done.

So people don't like him because that's how it goes when you're the GM of a pro sports team, and additionally because of the 2 items I actually bothered to list.
blank
Since69
15 years ago
Its because he's a tightwad, and he'd rather see our proud franchise ground into dust than have to deflate his ginormous ego by admitting to his many mistakes. He's a commie and an atheist and a puppy-kicker.

Personally, I think he's an evil cyborg from 2055, sent by future Patriots head coach/clone Mini-Belichick to destroy us before the 2056 Superbowl.

Or, it could be that we want our team and our heroes to stay the same forever and that he's not afraid of change. It could be that he's quicker to recognize problems and opportunities than the majority of us fans are, and that he's unafraid of "blowing up" the team for its own good.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
I think Ted Thompson is one of the best GM's in the NFL. We are lucky to have him, ESPECIALLY in light of the fact that it was "transition time" with regard to a certain HOF quarterback. Ted could use some Dale Carnegie courses in order to satiate the fan masses, but that isn't how he earns or should earn his pay. How them Jets doin' for quarterback these days, btw?
4PackGirl
15 years ago
he comes across to me as "odd" & unsure of himself when speaking publicly. he's not yer "atta boy" type guy which makes him unrelatable (is that a word?) to alot of us down home people.
bigfog
15 years ago
I think he's doing a decent job. But, I agree that one winning season in four doesn't make me love the guy.
"I wouldn't root for the Minnesota Vikings to win a chess match against Nazi Germany."
warhawk
15 years ago

I think he's doing a decent job. But, I agree that one winning season in four doesn't make me love the guy.

"bigfog" wrote:



First of all I don't even blame the guy for the first season because THAT team and state of it was WHY he was hired in the first place. It sucked.

Did he or could he make major changes to it? NO.

Then he started paring down and rebuilding and they had a so-so next year followed by a great year.

Now last year was not good but WHAT DO YOU WANT HIM TO DO? It was the SAME team as the year before when they were great. He did what he was SUPPOSED to do. Try to build on it and make it better but NOT make a lot of changes to something that had improved so drastically over two years.

When you have a very young team and the results are as positive as they had been you don't go rip it up and who, with any reasonable sense, would expect that unless of course it's AFTER THE FACT when hindsight is 20-20?
"The train is leaving the station."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Same team roster wise, but on the field, it was a completely different team. Thanks to Mr. Injury. That fool.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago

Its because he's a tightwad, and he'd rather see our proud franchise ground into dust than have to deflate his ginormous ego by admitting to his many mistakes. He's a commie and an atheist and a puppy-kicker.

Personally, I think he's an evil cyborg from 2055, sent by future Patriots head coach/clone Mini-Belichick to destroy us before the 2056 Superbowl.

Or, it could be that we want our team and our heroes to stay the same forever and that he's not afraid of change. It could be that he's quicker to recognize problems and opportunities than the majority of us fans are, and that he's unafraid of "blowing up" the team for its own good.

"Since69" wrote:



Best post on the board, ever. +1 and a donated organ of your choice. (Drink away.)
UserPostedImage
15 years ago



To answer the question: This is really quite simple, at least on the face of the issue. People don't like Thompson because he's the GM of a professional sports franchise -

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



ding ding ding!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (17h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.