This speculation just sounds bizarre and out of place. Favre was great while he was here, but guess what, he's not a Packer anymore. I want to see him play well (or maybe just retire now), but I have absolutely no allegiance to him, and neither does/should the Packers front office.
"MassPackersFan" wrote:
Here is the thing though, that really makes me wonder on this whole deal.
Brett has an ego, that much has been clear since the late 90's.. but honestly any competitive person will have one.
But look at Brett's track record of 17 years. He bled for his team and teammates, took stands against players holding out under contract and maybe took what a handful of plays off in his career.
He did many act of kindness and charity around this area and never heard him put anyone down. Some say he was stuck up and wouldn't sign autographs.. come on... tell me after a days worth of work on your way out of the job, you would want to stop and sign autographs before jumping in your car daily? And being around training camp for years, some people are just plain rude about it.. for me personally, if a kid is asking, I probably would stop and sign..
Now, I don't agree with everything that Brett has done in the past year or so.. but to flip on the switch and turn him into Packer enemy number one just doesn't fly with me either.
Don't think the Packers would smear someones name to offset some of the criticism from them and their disappointing season? Is it really that big of a stretch? Not going out and hunting it down and forcing the issue, but if the opportunity comes along.. yeah I could see a barb here or there.
Personally, it is over, Rodgers and anyone else talking on the Packers behalf shouldn't be talking about Brett period.
Let the issue die, focus on 2009 and come to camp ready to freaking hit anything in sight with a passion to erase the 2008 taste and grasp victory by the hand again.
Just let it go.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"