DoddPower
9 years ago



I think this was the play where Rodgers kept running in circles trying to get out of the pocket then got sacked. He's doing this way too much. I'll buy that the offensive line hasn't been great and the WRs haven't gotten open sometimes but I will not buy that they've been as bad as this offense has looked. Rodgers needs to get right and stop trying to play backyard football on every single freaking play.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



You can find plenty of examples both ways. I argue that there are more opportunities where the receivers have little separation or the offensive line play is pathetic than Aaron Rodgers missing open receivers. There are screen shots to show that, as well. With that being said, I don't think anyone is arguing that Aaron Rodgers is blameless. It's obvious he is. However, it's a TEAM issue, not just receivers, offensive line, QB, or coaching. They are all to blame. But if an offensive line can't block, receivers struggle to get open consistently, and the offensive scheme isn't the greatest, most QBs will struggle. Once a QB hears footsteps, they play scared.

I've said Aaron Rodgers needs to play better for years, especially in the playoffs. But he absolutely needs more help from the rest of his teammates. If Aaron Rodgers "only" plays "good" or "average," the Packers don't stand a chance. The rest of the team should be better, especially the defense, imo.
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

You can find plenty of examples both ways. I argue that there are more opportunities where the receivers have little separation or the offensive line play is pathetic than Aaron Rodgers missing open receivers. There are screen shots to show that, as well. With that being said, I don't think anyone is arguing that Aaron Rodgers is blameless. It's obvious he is. However, it's a TEAM issue, not just receivers, offensive line, QB, or coaching. They are all to blame. But if an offensive line can't block, receivers struggle to get open consistently, and the offensive scheme isn't the greatest, most QBs will struggle. Once a QB hears footsteps, they play scared.

I've said Aaron Rodgers needs to play better for years, especially in the playoffs. But he absolutely needs more help from the rest of his teammates. If Aaron Rodgers "only" plays "good" or "average," the Packers don't stand a chance. The rest of the team should be better, especially the defense, imo.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



My problem with this is, Rodgers is the QB, he knows the Oline is struggling. He is the guy that needs to be going to Clements and Mike and saying. We can't be running all these deep routes because the line can't protect long enough. He is the guy that needs to be changing the plays being called to help his Oline out.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
nerdmann
9 years ago

My problem with this is, Rodgers is the QB, he knows the Oline is struggling. He is the guy that needs to be going to Clements and Mike and saying. We can't be running all these deep routes because the line can't protect long enough. He is the guy that needs to be changing the plays being called to help his Oline out.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



He's also the one who should be getting the ball out in under 8 seconds.

What I find strange is that this happened ALL OF A SUDDEN.

Aaron goes from being compared to Micheal Jordan, Eddie Lacy goes from elite to can't do shit, the offensive line suddenly starts missing assignments, the D goes from domination and sack leadership to surrendering 500 yards per game.

ALL AT ONCE.

Wtf gives, man?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DakotaT
9 years ago

He's also the one who should be getting the ball out in under 8 seconds.

What I find strange is that this happened ALL OF A SUDDEN.

Aaron goes from being compared to Micheal Jordan, Eddie Lacy goes from elite to can't do shit, the offensive line suddenly starts missing assignments, the D goes from domination and sack leadership to surrendering 500 yards per game.

ALL AT ONCE.

Wtf gives, man?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Vegas! Ever re-watched Super Bowl 32?
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago

My problem with this is, Rodgers is the QB, he knows the Oline is struggling. He is the guy that needs to be going to Clements and Mike and saying. We can't be running all these deep routes because the line can't protect long enough. He is the guy that needs to be changing the plays being called to help his Oline out.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



First of all, how do you know he's not? Second of all, he isn't the only one that is accountable for this stuff. He shouldn't have to do that, even if he does. The Packers should have good enough coaches to address and scheme these issues for Rodgers, develop a solid game plan, and depend on Rodgers and the offense to execute the plan. If Rodgers has to tell the coaches what the problems are, the Packers need new coaches ASAP (which I think they do, at least offensive line coach and defensive coordinator).

Ultimately, Rodgers needs more help. He's a great player but he's not super man. He needs more help from the coaches, offense, and defense if the Packers are going to be champions again, and that's only going to become more of a priority as the years pass. But with that being said, Aaron Rodgers is much more than good enough to win at least one more Super Bowl. The rest depends on the pieces around him, which includes coaches that help/make him play better.
DakotaT
9 years ago



Ultimately, Rodgers needs more help. He's a great player but he's not super man. He needs more help from the coaches, offense, and defense if the Packers are going to be champions again, and that's only going to become more of a priority as the years pass. But with that being said, Aaron Rodgers is much more than good enough to win at least one more Super Bowl. The rest depends on the pieces around him, which includes coaches that help/make him play better.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



We should have already had 2 more Lombardis in the trophy case. That's what pisses me off about the slurpers in here that just accept every lame ass excuse coming out of 1265 Lombardi Ave. We pissed away Favre's career and are doing the exact same thing now with Rodgers'.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

First of all, how do you know he's not? Second of all, he isn't the only one that is accountable for this stuff. He shouldn't have to do that, even if he does. The Packers should have good enough coaches to address and scheme these issues for Rodgers, develop a solid game plan, and depend on Rodgers and the offense to execute the plan. If Rodgers has to tell the coaches what the problems are, the Packers need new coaches ASAP (which I think they do, at least offensive line coach and defensive coordinator).

Ultimately, Rodgers needs more help. He's a great player but he's not super man. He needs more help from the coaches, offense, and defense if the Packers are going to be champions again, and that's only going to become more of a priority as the years pass. But with that being said, Aaron Rodgers is much more than good enough to win at least one more Super Bowl. The rest depends on the pieces around him, which includes coaches that help/make him play better.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



He could be, and I guess that could be one explanation for some of his body language. But if that is the case, than he should give those MVP awards back. He has been sold as potentially the best ever. That he has such control and freedom of the offense at the LOS. Apparently that is BS. Because either he can't change and call his own plays at the LOS, or he thinks the plays being called are just fine.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DoddPower
9 years ago

We should have already had 2 more Lombardis in the trophy case. That's what pisses me off about the slurpers in here that just accept every lame ass excuse coming out of 1265 Lombardi Ave. We pissed away Favre's career and are doing the exact same thing now with Rodgers'.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Yeah, I don't necessarily get the angst towards Rodgers. Yes, he needs to play better. That's been the case for years and most his career outside of late 2010, 2011, and sporadic other times. But the bottom line is that he's plenty good enough to be a multiple Super Bowl champion. If he consistently had a solid defense and offensive line play, the Packers would have likely had at least one more ring. But without that, it's more and more obvious that Rodgers can't carry the team alone. It is what it is. It's not like he isn't trying, but a player is only so good.

The Packers need to fix their issues while they actually have a QB good enough to win championships. Otherwise, they may be stuck with a shitty defense, average at best offensive line, AND a QB that can't win a championship after Rodgers leaves (potentially, of course). Acknowledge the most important players strengths and weaknesses, and design a program around that on both sides of the ball.
DakotaT
9 years ago

Yeah, I don't necessarily get the angst towards Rodgers. Yes, he needs to play better. That's been the case for years and most his career outside of late 2010, 2011, and sporadic other times. But the bottom line is that he's plenty good enough to be a multiple Super Bowl champion. If he consistently had a solid defense and offensive line play, the Packers would have likely had at least one more ring. But without that, it's more and more obvious that Rodgers can't carry the team alone. The Packers need to fix their issues while they actually have a QB good enough to win championships. Otherwise, they may be stuck with a shitty defensive, offensive line, AND a QB that won't win a championship.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



2011 and last year should have been championship years. Hell, Mike McCarthy should have been fired on the spot in Seattle. That's what happens in the real world when you fuck up like that. The manager gets the ax on a colossal clusterfuck like that disaster. And the shareholders don't come to his defense that he didn't have any control of what the players were doing. If he'd toughen up his practices, his players wouldn't be such candy asses that would piss away such an important game.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
9 years ago

First of all, how do you know he's not? Second of all, he isn't the only one that is accountable for this stuff. He shouldn't have to do that, even if he does. The Packers should have good enough coaches to address and scheme these issues for Rodgers, develop a solid game plan, and depend on Rodgers and the offense to execute the plan. If Rodgers has to tell the coaches what the problems are, the Packers need new coaches ASAP (which I think they do, at least offensive line coach and defensive coordinator).

Ultimately, Rodgers needs more help. He's a great player but he's not super man. He needs more help from the coaches, offense, and defense if the Packers are going to be champions again, and that's only going to become more of a priority as the years pass. But with that being said, Aaron Rodgers is much more than good enough to win at least one more Super Bowl. The rest depends on the pieces around him, which includes coaches that help/make him play better.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Right on brother Packers fan.
But besides the coaching aspect of this conversation the Packers need a GM that is willing to step out of the closet and put the pieces in place that the coaching staff needs to win championships.
This guy ain't gettin it done via the draft.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (8h) : Packers will get in
beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.