buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



O-line?

šŸ˜ šŸ˜ šŸ˜ šŸ˜
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
Well I am expecting less than 40 total points between teams this Monday. I see pressure on both QBs effecting the points total.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
PackerTraxx
9 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Tex I really hope you're right on this one. A deep threat with our O would be huge, we don't have one now. It would keep D's from crowding the line.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
steveishere
9 years ago

Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Rodgers scrambling does not automatically mean the offensive line was bad. Last year he held the ball on average over 5 and a half seconds before he scrambled which was the 5th longest time in the NFL. I'm not one of those people who is negative about Rodgers "holding the ball too long" because he does amazing things when he does it but the fact is he does hold the ball for a long time typically which gives defenders more time to get to him which means defenders are going to reach him more often regardless of how well the line does.

Saying he had to run out of the pocket sometimes therefore the line was bad without adding any context to it is meaningless.
beast
9 years ago

None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No thanks, I've heard too many Packers addicted crazy people post there! šŸ¤£
UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



They had him there (as the 4th WR) after Jordy went down...

and they didn't like it so they brought in James Jones to make him the 5th WR again...

Adams went down so he became the 4th WR for a short period of time.
Janis has a ton of physical potential, but he still doesn't play up to that physical potential... hopefully another offseason or two and he'll have a huge breakout and who knows, maybe replace Nelson. But until that happens it seems like he's best as a 5th WR.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (4h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (6h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (22h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! šŸ˜
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.