buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



O-line?

šŸ˜ šŸ˜ šŸ˜ šŸ˜
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
Well I am expecting less than 40 total points between teams this Monday. I see pressure on both QBs effecting the points total.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
PackerTraxx
9 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Tex I really hope you're right on this one. A deep threat with our O would be huge, we don't have one now. It would keep D's from crowding the line.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
steveishere
9 years ago

Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Rodgers scrambling does not automatically mean the offensive line was bad. Last year he held the ball on average over 5 and a half seconds before he scrambled which was the 5th longest time in the NFL. I'm not one of those people who is negative about Rodgers "holding the ball too long" because he does amazing things when he does it but the fact is he does hold the ball for a long time typically which gives defenders more time to get to him which means defenders are going to reach him more often regardless of how well the line does.

Saying he had to run out of the pocket sometimes therefore the line was bad without adding any context to it is meaningless.
beast
9 years ago

None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No thanks, I've heard too many Packers addicted crazy people post there! šŸ¤£
UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



They had him there (as the 4th WR) after Jordy went down...

and they didn't like it so they brought in James Jones to make him the 5th WR again...

Adams went down so he became the 4th WR for a short period of time.
Janis has a ton of physical potential, but he still doesn't play up to that physical potential... hopefully another offseason or two and he'll have a huge breakout and who knows, maybe replace Nelson. But until that happens it seems like he's best as a 5th WR.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (4h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (4h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (5h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (9h) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tuaā€™s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tuaā€™s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.