nerdmann
9 years ago

"It feels great, man," Jones said. "Just getting better every day and taking every rep serious, making sure every day my cleats touch the grass and I’m getting better. That’s the main focus."

The solid performance from Jones on Wednesday continued a recent stretch of elevated play that began with the first exhibition game against New England last week. Playing with the second-team defensive line — Jones took the field along with Khyri Thornton and Mike Pennel up front — Jones contributed two of the Green Bay Packers' seven sacks.

JSOnline Blog  wrote:



I still say he can get after the passer.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I still say he can get after the passer.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yeah, as long as he's lined up against backups. Keep in mind New England's starting OL ain't much.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
9 years ago
He can get after the passer against starters too he just needs to be better against the run or he'll never see enough snaps to be able to do it consistently.
DoddPower
9 years ago
The Packers REALLY need this guy to become a play maker. Badly. he could change the face of the Packers defense if he could become a very good player.
nerdmann
9 years ago

He can get after the passer against starters too he just needs to be better against the run or he'll never see enough snaps to be able to do it consistently.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



They knew he was a tweener when they drafted him. Least they could do is use him properly.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
OlHoss1884
9 years ago
I think Jones is solid if healthy. If the front 3 (or 4, if we're in Nickel) is SOLID, I can live with that. If the defense ends up average overall, this offense will win us a Super Bowl.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
PackerTraxx
9 years ago
I too was excited about the Perry pick. With his speed and size I thought he could get down to 260 and be an outstanding LB. It seems he just doesn't have the instincts to play at a high level at LB. Maybe it still happens but time is running out. Datone just doesn't fit the scheme. He would be much better in a 4-3, I could see him leaving in free agency for that reason. I would look into the possibility of a trade. We need a couple of 6'5" to 6'7", 300# DEs. I know that's easier said than done but they could have done something like trading down to take a lesser talent that fits, for a higher pick the following year to have a shot at a higher talent that fits. Right now we're doing it with one #1 pick, low draft choices and free agents on the line. Simple put I think a better job could be done at getting better players that fit the scheme, as someone mentioned. Ted Thompson does a good job, but like everyone, he's not perfect and this is an area we could be better at.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
nerdmann
9 years ago

I too was excited about the Perry pick. With his speed and size I thought he could get down to 260 and be an outstanding LB. It seems he just doesn't have the instincts to play at a high level at LB. Maybe it still happens but time is running out. Datone just doesn't fit the scheme. He would be much better in a 4-3, I could see him leaving in free agency for that reason. I would look into the possibility of a trade. We need a couple of 6'5" to 6'7", 300# DEs. I know that's easier said than done but they could have done something like trading down to take a lesser talent that fits, for a higher pick the following year to have a shot at a higher talent that fits. Right now we're doing it with one #1 pick, low draft choices and free agents on the line. Simple put I think a better job could be done at getting better players that fit the scheme, as someone mentioned. Ted Thompson does a good job, but like everyone, he's not perfect and this is an area we could be better at.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 



I think Perry's fine.

They had that theory that the "pass rushing" OLB would be on one side and the "run stuffing" guy would be on the other. I think that's why they drafted him. Just needs to stay healthy. He can play.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
I agree. Ultimately the health factor with these first round picks has been a consistent factor, and one that is kind of a head scratcher.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
DoddPower
9 years ago

I think Perry's fine.

They had that theory that the "pass rushing" OLB would be on one side and the "run stuffing" guy would be on the other. I think that's why they drafted him. Just needs to stay healthy. He can play.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Perry can absolutely play. Just watch him when he's healthy. He the best linebacker on the team against the run, and is OK as a pass rusher. He's a solid high average player with upside. He just can't seem to stay healthy. Definitely not a bust for the late first round. But if he fails to stay healthy for yet another season he could easily slide into the bust category. Gotta be available.

I did really expect him to play faster than he does though with his great timed speed and strength. The guy is a freak athletically. Totally understandable why a General Manager would take a chance on a player like that late in the first round. Although it probably should have been a 4-3 team.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (4h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (4h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (6h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (11h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (11h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.