So people are mad because we don't have a stud receiver as our #3,4 or 5 am I reading that right? I like the fact that if we need to we can use our #3 in mismatches as we did against the Pats last year. But yes I know what you mean heaven forbid that we don't have a $10 million a year #3 receiver. I would love to have the tall speed burner like it seems the Vikes are loaded with, but they haven't proved they can catch the ball. But ya go ahead and keep bitching because we don't have a $10 million 3rd wr and a $7 million #4 receiver.Just remember alot of teams would love to have the players we have at wide receiver.
Originally Posted by: dhazer
Yes, I want a 10 million WR at 3 and 4. I want to see them either take over for Jordy who'll be done in 3 years, or not signed because they're too costly. That is exactly what I want.
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
Yes, but since Janis is the best ever seen at the position and he is a cheap free agent, we are set!!!! He's cheap, irreplaceable and ours!Until Sept, when he's cut for failing to prove even an average talent...
Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close