uffda udfa
9 years ago

Vince Lombardi and the Green Bay Packers are synonymous with winning. Green Bay is called Titletown for a reason. All of that came to mind this past week when the Indianapolis Colts raised their "finalist' banner at Lucas Oil Stadium. Raising a banner is not an every year thing for teams in the NFL, unless

LombardiAve  wrote:



This is a piece from one those types of websites I generally don't respect but I found one little bit of it very interesting.

One of the things I've harped on here with our GM is not going for it...not wanting to win SB's, but rather win the division to pacify the fan base who seems generally happy, especially here.

I found this portion of the article flies in the face of the mentality of most of the posters who frequent here:

You won’t see the Green Bay Packers hoisting any kind of “finalist” banner any time soon. In fact, anyone and everyone associated with that organization or any of the millions of fans who follow the team would want that.

Our org is known for Vince Lombardi and his passion for being the BEST...not division champs and a fart in the wind in the playoffs. He stood for WINNING IT ALL or NOTHING AT ALL. How have the fans here become so satisfied with less than the best? How?

That article states what I believe... it's a JOKE to hoist some kind of finalist banner for anything even the SB. There is no lost to Denver banner hanging at Lambeau.

So, why do so many seem to betray the underpinnings of the very essence of being a Packers fan? Winning isn't everything...it's the only thing? I know someone here recently said something to the effect of Lombardi would regret that statement? Huh?

As you know, I will continue lambasting our GM for not being sold out to win it all. Nothing else matters except to many of the people here and I would really like to hear why?
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

This is a piece from one those types of websites I generally don't respect but I found one little bit of it very interesting.

One of the things I've harped on here with our GM is not going for it...not wanting to win SB's, but rather win the division to pacify the fan base who seems generally happy, especially here.

I found this portion of the article flies in the face of the mentality of most of the posters who frequent here:

You won’t see the Green Bay Packers hoisting any kind of “finalist” banner any time soon. In fact, anyone and everyone associated with that organization or any of the millions of fans who follow the team would want that.

Our org is known for Vince Lombardi and his passion for being the BEST...not division champs and a fart in the wind in the playoffs. He stood for WINNING IT ALL or NOTHING AT ALL. How have the fans here become so satisfied with less than the best? How?

That article states what I believe... it's a JOKE to hoist some kind of finalist banner for anything even the SB. There is no lost to Denver banner hanging at Lambeau.

So, why do so many seem to betray the underpinnings of the very essence of being a Packers fan? Winning isn't everything...it's the only thing? I know someone here recently said something to the effect of Lombardi would regret that statement? Huh?

As you know, I will continue lambasting our GM for not being sold out to win it all. Nothing else matters except to many of the people here and I would really like to hear why?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I guess none of us have as high standards as you do.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I guess none of us have as high standards as you do.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Is that facetious or factual? I really want to know why we're so different. Wade and Dakota are two guys who seem to think like I do.

Perhaps, our age has something to do with this?

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


68md
9 years ago

Is that facetious or factual? I really want to know why we're so different. Wade and Dakota are two guys who seem to think like I do.

Perhaps, our age has something to do with this?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




Big difference between having high expectations and unrealistic expectations. To believe a team should achieving things in 2015 what they did in 1968 is unrealistic.

NFL is a very different animal now with this CBA and each year is a crap shoot. Uffda a lot of what ya'll say has validity but you don't have to say it 14 times and refuse to let it die. Oh and I know several fans older and younger that have similar views as yours so it's not age.
DakotaT
9 years ago
The problem I see is that the Packers under Ted Thompson don't "go for it" like they did in under Wolf. And that is because of TT's fiscal responsibility to keep a contending team in Green Bay. Now is the time to load up our defense. We have all the pieces in place to run off a few titles, but again we go into the season with holes in secondary and at inside linebacker.

Would it make sense to shore all this up before the season, spend a little money, or trade away some future draft picks? This is what drives some Packers' fans crazy.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

Big difference between having high expectations and unrealistic expectations. To believe a team should achieving things in 2015 what they did in 1968 is unrealistic.

NFL is a very different animal now with this CBA and each year is a crap shoot. Uffda a lot of what ya'll say has validity but you don't have to say it 14 times and refuse to let it die. Oh and I know several fans older and younger that have similar views as yours so it's not age.

Originally Posted by: wideside 



Lombardi's team had to play what, 12-14 games in the regular season, then win TWO playoff games?

A little easier to threepeat in that scenario. Not saying it was easy, but 5 championships in 6 years? That's a bit much to "expect" in today's NFL.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

The problem I see is that the Packers under Ted Thompson don't "go for it" like they did in under Wolf. And that is because of TT's fiscal responsibility to keep a contending team in Green Bay. Now is the time to load up our defense. We have all the pieces in place to run off a few titles, but again we go into the season with holes in secondary and at inside linebacker.

Would it make sense to shore all this up before the season, spend a little money, or trade away some future draft picks? This is what drives some Packers' fans crazy.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



True about Thompson, except Wolfe was that way too - with the one notable exception: Reggie White.

The thing is, though, I - and I think the great majority of fans - would not want what you are suggesting - basically take more risks, presumably veteran free agent signings now, and give up those draft picks down the road through trades.

I'm certainly not the Ted Thompson fan that most fans are. I'm also not against him like a few are. We are where we are because of Aaron Rodgers more than anything else - and of course Thompson gets credit for that. We also have way more than our share of low round and UDFA successes - which Thompson gets even more credit for. My only gripe has been that Thompson didn't maximize things - doing better with high round picks, etc. Well, I said "has been". The roster he has built now is pretty damn near maximized in talent, and that includes defense. I think you just let it ride and see what happens - rather than sacrifice down the road. We have so much young talent that I would hate to see a veteran free agent or two take away their roster or lineup spots.

This thread is about a Vince Lombardi quote ....... well, as great a coach as Vince was, he wasn't much of a GM. His "no room for second place" thing was more about getting the most out of what we have. That's on McCarthy if we don't. Don't get me wrong, I like McCarthy more than I like Thompson, but Thompson has put the great roster together; Now it's up to McCarthy to win with it.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
nerdmann
9 years ago

The problem I see is that the Packers under Ted Thompson don't "go for it" like they did in under Wolf. And that is because of TT's fiscal responsibility to keep a contending team in Green Bay. Now is the time to load up our defense. We have all the pieces in place to run off a few titles, but again we go into the season with holes in secondary and at inside linebacker.

Would it make sense to shore all this up before the season, spend a little money, or trade away some future draft picks? This is what drives some Packers' fans crazy.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



The way I look at it, the problem has been this team's propensity to shit themselves in crucial situations and thus piss away grave opportunities. For example, what transpired this past January.

Hopefull we've made adjustments for that.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

The way I look at it, the problem has been this team's propensity to shit themselves in crucial situations and thus piss away grave opportunities. For example, what transpired this past January.

Hopefull we've made adjustments for that.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I don't often agree with you, but when you're right, you're right.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Big difference between having high expectations and unrealistic expectations. To believe a team should achieving things in 2015 what they did in 1968 is unrealistic.

NFL is a very different animal now with this CBA and each year is a crap shoot. Uffda a lot of what ya'll say has validity but you don't have to say it 14 times and refuse to let it die. Oh and I know several fans older and younger that have similar views as yours so it's not age.

Originally Posted by: wideside 



I know...but I usually have 14 people disagreeing with me that I respond to trying to show them why I'm not as crazy as they label me. This is a quid pro quo deal. Let me say what I say without saying or posting right after it how wrong I am. That kills forums...you gotta flesh it out.



UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (4h) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Was that for the team or the city?
Zero2Cool (5h) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
Zero2Cool (5h) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
Zero2Cool (5h) : ✅ ...
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Check
Zero2Cool (8h) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
Martha Careful (15h) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (15h) : Agree
dfosterf (16h) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (16h) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (16h) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (21h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (23h) : Great point Martha
beast (23h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (25-Apr) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (25-Apr) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (25-Apr) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

2h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Packers Draft Threads / earthquake

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.