uffda udfa
9 years ago

Right. 😕 You said he wasn't a legitimate #3 wide receiver, but you never actually used the word "sucks."



Originally Posted by: greengold 



Where did I say he wasn't a legit #3?...he's suited well for that role. A run of the mill possession WR.

EVERYONE should desire unique athleticism from ALL our players. Would you rather have it than not? Not sure what I'm getting hammered for desiring a guy who compares favorably to Julio Jones over a guy who is just like untold numbers of WR's before him? Shame on me.

Welcome back, Dakota...this is a better place with you here.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


greengold
9 years ago

Where did I say he wasn't a legit #3?...

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Not once but twice. How quickly you forget.

Yeah, Rodgers is to blame...he's playing on one leg vs. the best D in the NFL with no legit TE or 3rd WR. Pin it on him because it fits with Ted Thompson being all world as a GM. The one SB we did win was due to Rodgers playing out of his mind.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Davante wasn't a legit 3rd...that guy regressed at the end when we needed him most. Perhaps, he hit the wall...I don't know but he was nothing vs. Seattle's secondary. He played well in a few spots...not a consistent performer.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



uffda udfa
9 years ago

Not once but twice. How quickly you forget.





Originally Posted by: greengold 



In my defense, he is pretty forgettable. He was anything but legit in that game.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
9 years ago

Who was James Jones behind when he didn't measure up to Davante's numbers like you said? He outdid Davante's numbers behind Jennings and Driver.

You seem to forget that Davante played in an O with a real running game something the others didn't. That opens things.

Steve...Janis looked special doing something on an NFL field. Davante never has.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



First ya gotta get the facts straight on rookie WRs:

G. Jennings had the decidedly worst rookie year [73 PR; 104 targets was a lot for his production]; but he was thrust into the #2 WR early.

Cobb was 4th WR and 5th option behind Finley; he had best rook year [127 PR]; but as 5th option he was ONLY utilized in packages specifically designed for him.

Jordy was a #4- the three in front had 256 targets [93 PR]

J.Jones was a #3; but DD and GJ missed 5 games giving him more opps.; the two in front only had 206 targets [94 PR]

Adams was a #3; But JN and RC had 278 targets ahead of him [93 PR].

Run game in:
2007 345 for 1543 for 4.47 avg
2014 382 for 1658 for 4.34 avg

The 2007 run game for Jones was more efficient than the 2014 run game for Adams; so if your argument holds true, The run game advantaged Jones more than Adams. Moreover, the run game in 2014 took away 37 more targets from the 2014 WRs than the 2007 WRs.

You must have been on a cruise in San Fransisco Bay when Al Davis' ashes were scattered there; you imbibed his affinity for measurables. They mean nothing if owned by a guy who cant play football or can't play football as well as others.

The difference between 4.3 and 4.5 in shorts, from a track start, starting when you want is meaningless. Once the pads go on w/ no track starts and you must react to a snap; mental preparedness is what determines speed. A 4.4 guy who reacts 1/4 sec. slower than the 4.9 guy across from him is really a 4.65 guy.

And please enough w/ using Combine 40s, like they were given to Goodell by a burning bush on Mt Sinai several millennia ago! Hayward consistently ran low 4.4s...Hayward is a low 4.4 guy who just happened to run a 4.57 at combine. Jerry Rice is a mid 4.5 guy who ran a 4.71 at combine. A person's speed is defined by how fast they are [LOL, now look what you did-you made sound like Yogi Berra]; not necessarily the time they ran at a combine.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

You gotta fire that camera man. I felt as though I was watching hockey back in the 70's. 😁 😁 😁

Originally Posted by: sschind 



It was just some fan with his phone I am guessing, lol.


As for the play itself. It was a helluva play that was recognized on sports shows. Displaying track speed outrunning people flat out is nothing special. The world is full of extremely straight line speed athletes. How many of them can catch a ball, juke someone stiff and out run four defenders to score a touchdown? You want players who can create space and that is what Davante Adams does. Similar to Sterling Sharpe. No, he is no where near Sharpe, he's just the first that came to mind that was not fast, yet could get yards after the catch with power.

I'm not saying Jeff Janis play was garbage, but it was against a team that won just six games against players that weren't even good enough to make that team's roster. Davante Adams play came in the POST SEASON against a team playing it's starters that won 12 games that season.

To say Janis play was more than Adams is just not really a clear objective opinion, from where I stand anyhow.


I would lean more to Adams being a solid 2nd round pick. If he continues to ascend, then maybe he'll be a steal. I don't see him ascending to the starters unless Jordy Nelson or Randall Cobb leave.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

First ya gotta get the facts straight on rookie WRs:

G. Jennings had the decidedly worst rookie year [73 PR; 104 targets was a lot for his production]; but he was thrust into the #2 WR early.

Cobb was 4th WR and 5th option behind Finley; he had best rook year [127 PR]; but as 5th option he was ONLY utilized in packages specifically designed for him.

Jordy was a #4- the three in front had 256 targets [93 PR]

J.Jones was a #3; but DD and GJ missed 5 games giving him more opps.; the two in front only had 206 targets [94 PR]

Adams was a #3; But JN and RC had 278 targets ahead of him [93 PR].

Run game in:
2007 345 for 1543 for 4.47 avg
2014 382 for 1658 for 4.34 avg

The 2007 run game for Jones was more efficient than the 2014 run game for Adams; so if your argument holds true, The run game advantaged Jones more than Adams. Moreover, the run game in 2014 took away 37 more targets from the 2014 WRs than the 2007 WRs.

You must have been on a cruise in San Fransisco Bay when Al Davis' ashes were scattered there; you imbibed his affinity for measurables. They mean nothing if owned by a guy who cant play football or can't play football as well as others.

The difference between 4.3 and 4.5 in shorts, from a track start, starting when you want is meaningless. Once the pads go on w/ no track starts and you must react to a snap; mental preparedness is what determines speed. A 4.4 guy who reacts 1/4 sec. slower than the 4.9 guy across from him is really a 4.65 guy.

And please enough w/ using Combine 40s, like they were given to Goodell by a burning bush on Mt Sinai several millennia ago! Hayward consistently ran low 4.4s...Hayward is a low 4.4 guy who just happened to run a 4.57 at combine. Jerry Rice is a mid 4.5 guy who ran a 4.71 at combine. A person's speed is defined by how fast they are [LOL, now look what you did-you made sound like Yogi Berra]; not necessarily the time they ran at a combine.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I love your posts Barfarn but I don't like when you hold back for trying to make a point. You know full well that defenses play the run more with Eddie Lacy in the Packers backfield than they did back when James Jones was a rookie. Of course, when a defense is more focused on the run it's harder to run against it. It isn't about run average, it's about defensive commitment.

You really seem dismissive of 40 times when they aren't flattering to our players. It is, has been, and will continue being a major measure used by NFL scouts and GM's who are paid good money to find the right guys. There are examples of slower players performing quite well...Emmitt, Jerry Rice, Curtis Martin, etc...but if you had to choose, you would hope all your skill guys ran 4.3 vs. 4.4 or 4.5 or higher. How many times do you hear... He WOULD'VE gone a lot higher had her run better in Indianapolis?
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DoddPower
9 years ago

There are examples of slower players performing quite well...Emmitt, Jerry Rice, Curtis Martin, etc...but if you had to choose, you would hope all your skill guys ran 4.3 vs. 4.4 or 4.5 or higher. How many times do you hear... He WOULD'VE gone a lot higher had her run better in Indianapolis?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If I had to choose, I would want the better football player, whether that means great or average measurables.

DoddPower
9 years ago

I would lean more to Adams being a solid 2nd round pick. If he continues to ascend, then maybe he'll be a steal. I don't see him ascending to the starters unless Jordy Nelson or Randall Cobb leave.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



As long as he continues to develop, he'll be better than James Jones but not as good as Jordy Nelson.

greengold
9 years ago

You really seem dismissive of 40 times when they aren't flattering to our players. It is, has been, and will continue being a major measure used by NFL scouts and GM's who are paid good money to find the right guys.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



A players 40 time in shorts at the combine matters... UNTIL HE IS DRAFTED. The players we are talking about ARE ALREADY IN THE NFL. How they run today in full pads while catching or carrying a football is all that matters now.

Speaking of dismissive of measurables that aren't flattering to your favorite players... Jeff Janis is a full grown man. His hand size is a finite number that won't ever change when he puts the pads on. 8o

uffda udfa
9 years ago

A players 40 time in shorts at the combine matters... UNTIL HE IS DRAFTED. The players we are talking about ARE ALREADY IN THE NFL. How they run today in full pads while catching or carrying a football is all that matters now.

Speaking of dismissive of measurables that aren't flattering to your favorite players... Jeff Janis is a full grown man. His hand size is a finite number that won't ever change when he puts the pads on. 8o

Originally Posted by: greengold 



Yup...his hand size will always be the same as Davante's. 9 inches. Janis is bigger faster stronger and if they can build him into a real WR, maybe one day he'll be a six million dollar man like Steve Austin.

I'm not really sure what your point is on 40 times is? It remains as I said... guys who are paid a lot of money draft players higher with better 40 times. They have for years and it will be the same in the future. Pan the 40 all you like. You all would wish our skill players ran 4.3 instead of 4.5 or 4.6.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
dfosterf (15h) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19h) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (20h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (20h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (22h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.