ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago



Moreso.. there seems to be a resistance to Free Agents coming to Green Bay when an equal opportunity is available elsewhere.


Sprinkle Gregg Williams on top this offseason and you now have an arguable trend.

I can see the position, if one has an open mind, you certainly can understand why some would be skeptical at this point.

"pack93z" wrote:



I'm just going to quote and call out a couple points, here - I constantly hear about how there's a resistance to playing in Green Bay, but I have yet to see any real proof of it. Instead, it seems that fans assume there's a resistance because the team hasn't signed a player or players that they wanted the team to sign.

Williams, we don't know the deal there - he's well known for wanting tons of cash wherever he goes, and we've all seen his ego at work. There's as good a chance that he never intended to coach in GB and was just using us as leverage as there is that we somehow failed to land him. We got Capers, and the 'wisdom' on that was he'd go to NYC and coach w/ Coughlin again - how did that happen, if we're such an undesirable place?

NOW, that said: It's well-documented that Thompson isn't a big spender in FA. That's true, and I don't see a problem with any fan wanting that to be different, or complaining about it.

If I've seen a consistent complaint about some posters, it's that they don't say "I'm disappointed in the job Thompson's doing and I don't think he'll get better - I wish we had a different GM" - instead we get posts like "Ha! I told you all that Thompson sucks! Ha! The team lost and it's proving me right! Ted Thompson is the embodiment of all that is evil in the world, and the Green Bay Packers will be losers until he's burned!" Okay, that's an exaggeration, but the criticism this time was simply about the constant negativity, everywhere.

But I'm just another voice here, so whatevs. I would like more proof, be it anecdotal or something more concrete, that players don't want to play in GB, though - until someone can prove it, I just don't buy it.
blank
Pack93z
16 years ago
On the Williams deal, you have just about every insider saying that Williams took the Packers figures and leveraged them against the Saints.. which is fine it is business.. Since Caper got 2 million a year after this discounted year and the report I heard out of NO is a little above 2 million a year.. we can surmise that we offered Williams a fair deal.

Why he took that job over this one.. whom knows. Am I upset about it, nope.

In the post that you so artfully chopped bits and pieces that fit your argument, all I was trying to do is illustrate that there are events over the past couple of years that can support some skepticism along the lines of free agent signings and players spurning us for a different location.

Griffin, the report I believe was weather, Arrington who cares.. Smith,, never heard the reason why, I believe their deal was a better one.

Personally.. I like the approach, although I would be a little happier if he would have signed a free agent Olineman or two over the past 3 years.. not a bargain maybe like Klemm, but a bonifide NFL starting guard.

You have an equal voice here.. but so do those that have skepticism in their posts.. they have events that support that theory just as much as when I look at the roster and see depth and talent..

We don't need a ton of parts this season.. just a few along the lines.. and a few position coaches to get the max potential out of their players.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
16 years ago
BTW... you want proof.. then show me where a player has chosen us over another team for the same position.. maybe Pickett.

I listed three players.. the Arrington deal has been mentioned over and over..

We are not an active team in FA.. so it will be hard to generate a lengthy list either direction of the argument.

I think you may be reading to much into my post as well.. just trying to illustrate that there is some basis for the "reluctance of players to come here" argument.. and that posters shouldn't be called out for voicing it either.

That hater label is a pet peeve of mine.. the era of BS needs to find a home in the past.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago



In the post that you so artfully chopped bits and pieces that fit your argument, all I was trying to do is illustrate that there are events over the past couple of years that can support some skepticism along the lines of free agent signings and players spurning us for a different location.

Griffin, the report I believe was weather, Arrington who cares.. Smith,, never heard the reason why, I believe their deal was a better one.

"pack93z" wrote:




Okay, whoops. I knew I shouldn't have joined this conversation. My intent was not to artfully clip anything; I cut the pieces I had questions about, not in an effort to call you or anyone out.

I'm just another Packers fan - I don't claim to match the research and knowledge of any of the rest of you, and I can guarantee you that I don't wrap as much of myself into this as most of you. I'm not into arguing on the internet, so if I pissed you off I apologize.

Personally, I think the reports that players don't want to come to GB are exaggerated, and when they do choose a place it has more to do with lifestyle and other fit issues than it does with a bad reputation. I don't dispute that Thompson's MO is not to pay a lot of money in FA, nor do I dispute that players could look at that and choose accordingly.

Again, I'm sorry if you took my questions as an attack. I'm just going to sit back and be optimistic about the new DC and possibilities for the off-season.
blank
Pack93z
16 years ago



In the post that you so artfully chopped bits and pieces that fit your argument, all I was trying to do is illustrate that there are events over the past couple of years that can support some skepticism along the lines of free agent signings and players spurning us for a different location.

Griffin, the report I believe was weather, Arrington who cares.. Smith,, never heard the reason why, I believe their deal was a better one.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Okay, whoops. I knew I shouldn't have joined this conversation. My intent was not to artfully clip anything; I cut the pieces I had questions about, not in an effort to call you or anyone out.

I'm just another Packers fan - I don't claim to match the research and knowledge of any of the rest of you, and I can guarantee you that I don't wrap as much of myself into this as most of you. I'm not into arguing on the internet, so if I pissed you off I apologize.

Personally, I think the reports that players don't want to come to GB are exaggerated, and when they do choose a place it has more to do with lifestyle and other fit issues than it does with a bad reputation. I don't dispute that Thompson's MO is not to pay a lot of money in FA, nor do I dispute that players could look at that and choose accordingly.

Again, I'm sorry if you took my questions as an attack. I'm just going to sit back and be optimistic about the new DC and possibilities for the off-season.

"pack93z" wrote:



LOL.. first things first... I am not pissed nor likely anytime to get pissed off.. the only poster that managed to do that on a regular basis doesn't post here often. :lol:

Second, I didn't take them as an attack, moreso, I thought my basic premise of the post was missed.. and that is basically, I can see the points of those with skepticism, while I may not agree with them, I can see why they think the way they so.

And personally, I think calling them out as "haters" is something that should cease.

There are poster that stir trouble and some that actually have an opinion that doesn't match the mainstream... but they are an individual with a right to that opinion.

As long as they keep it within common logic and decency towards others, I don't see why they should be labeled anything but a fan with a varied opinion.

I don't think I have ever seen you label a poster, so that isn't a personal statement.. more or less if the shoe fits..

And lastly.. sorry if I offended.. I have a tendency to be blunt and direct.. and if nothing else opinionated to the core. :lol:
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
16 years ago


Personally, I think the reports that players don't want to come to GB are exaggerated, and when they do choose a place it has more to do with lifestyle and other fit issues than it does with a bad reputation. I don't dispute that Thompson's MO is not to pay a lot of money in FA, nor do I dispute that players could look at that and choose accordingly.
.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I too hold that belief, that there are situational reasons for each decision..

But one can see how some cling to the premise based on a few different events..

I wonder how one forms a perception of a event? What forms an individuals view of a event with depth?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago


Personally, I think the reports that players don't want to come to GB are exaggerated, and when they do choose a place it has more to do with lifestyle and other fit issues than it does with a bad reputation. I don't dispute that Thompson's MO is not to pay a lot of money in FA, nor do I dispute that players could look at that and choose accordingly.
.

"pack93z" wrote:



I too hold that belief, that there are situational reasons for each decision..

But on can see how some cling to the premise based on a few different events..

I wonder how one forms a perception of a event? What forms an individuals view of a event with depth?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




I think people are inclined towards their perceptions - in some cases, it's a past event (i.e. Randy Moss not being acquired), in other cases it's probably provided by environment (i.e. varied perceptions of the inner city; someone born there versus someone raised in a rural setting).

Obviously, Thompson isn't a weak personality - so he's going to rub some people the wrong way. Add that to a public perception that Thompson failed or declined to go after some FA candidates that a lot of fans wanted in GB, and an anti-Thompson stance is, as you say, somewhat understandable.

In the end, none of it matters - he'll do what he does, we'll discuss it to death, and eventually the team will hit the field and there'll be something concrete to discuss.
blank
Pack93z
16 years ago



In the end, none of it matters - he'll do what he does, we'll discuss it to death, and eventually the team will hit the field and there'll be something concrete to discuss.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Bingo.. that is the very reason why I think the infighting is silly.

Sure debate stances on a civil level without labels.. most long term posters here have a genuine love of the Packers.. they just might not agree with the franchise compass bearing at the current time.

Since we haven't won it all but have gotten close.. they is plenty of room on both sides for a posters opinion to lay..

Back to topic.. Vilma doesn't fit the 3-4 mold very well.. that has been proven in NY.. so he is likely out of contention of signing here.

Peppers.. his contract demands and risk / reward ratio are out of whack for a experimental move to the 3-4... sorry don't see it happening.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago
I did a little research to see what Thompson has done in FA since '05 (seems like it would fit in this thread, but if it needs to be moved that's cool):

Notable 2005 FA signings: Matt O'Dwyer and Adrian Klemm (OG), Samkon Gado (RB), Donald Lee (TE) and Rod Gardner (WR). Of these, only Lee is still with the team. If I recall correctly, O'Dwyer was thought to be a decent get, though he flamed out. Klemm was a stretch and also fizzled. Gado was a good role player.

Notable 2006 FA signings: Marquand Manuel (S), Ryan Pickett (DT), Ben Taylor (LB), Charles Woodson (CB). Pickett and Woodson, obviously, have been solid contributors. Manuel (a personal head-scratcher for me at the time, though it's not like our safeties were good) flopped, and for the life of me I don't even remember Ben Taylor.

Notable 2007 FA signings: Frank Walker (CB). Whew, that wasn't a good one (though he played reasonably well for the Ravens this year). I'll add that he did trade for Grant, who was basically our savior at RB that year.

Notable 2008 FA signings: Brandon Chillar (LB), Joe Toledo (OT), Thomas Gafford (LS). Chillar, IMO, was a contributor and could be a good player down the road. The other two I know nothing about.

Note, I haven't tried to compile every single FA signing, but am focusing on the notable ones. I didn't have time to search out a comprehensive list, so if I'm missing anyone important please point that out.

So. Not a stellar track record, when you focus solely on FA, which we all know isn't his preferred method of team-building. Still; Lee, Pick, Woody, and Chillar aren't bad. As for Moss, I didn't want him at the time and I will not be convinced that we would have beat the Giants if we had him - I know others feel differently, we'll have to agree to disagree.

Who are the other players we missed on? I'm asking sincerely, in terms of seeing all sides of the argument. Other players that people wanted or were rumored to be coming here? Arrington, the two FBs that 93z mentioned, who else?

It's a big stretch to argue that he's brought in a ton of talent, but he's proven that he does use FA and has brought significant contributors in that way. It seems that this year is probably a year when a significant signing or two would be most beneficial, so I'm interested to see if he's got that Wolfe-like instinct to make the moves when they're needed and will help. I hope he does.
blank
warhawk
16 years ago
I think the bottom line here is to consider what Ted Thompson was brought in here for and the situation the team was in at the time.

The roster was getting old, our depth beyond starters was non-existent, Favre was already talking about the tractor, and even our own prior GM was saying we had less than NFL caliber starters at various positions.

Ted Thompson was brought in to get the Cap managed properly and get an aging team younger and build quality depth into the roster and I am quite certain knew he had to find the future QB for the team as well.

The recipe was just not conducive for paying high end experienced FA's who all pretty much knew GB was reloading.

I will say this. Based on any reasonable timetable the '07 season and 13-3 came ahead of it's time but for every good break and close win we pulled out that year what goes around came around in '08.

2007 advanced the expectations and shortened the timetable for him and for the team. In short, the situation now is DIFFERENT than in the past because this last season went in REVERSE instead of a steady building process. We have not been a couple of FA's away from being a contender and in a place where feet are closer to the fire as they are now.

I thank Ted Thompson for getting us this far along this fast.

I believe this coming season with more urgency to improve certain aspects of the team and calling for a new defense will prompt Ted Thompson to do what need to be done to get us where we need to be.

You see I don't believe Ted Thompson has anything against FA at all. I don't think FA was the move to make.....until now. I think now he will make that move.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Who?
Zero2Cool (11h) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (14h) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : New forum has the ability to Thank a post now.
beast (24-Mar) : And the only time they have won the Championship in an even year, was the first time they did, in 2006.
beast (24-Mar) : Since 2007, there have been 10 odd numbered years, Wisconsin Women have won the Championship in 7 of those 10 odd numbered years.
buckeyepackfan (24-Mar) : Congratulations Lady Badger Hockey Team. NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : I don't think it's completed yet. it was just announced last month, right?
dhazer (23-Mar) : did netflix ever release the Packers documentary
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : And it is glorious!
beast (21-Mar) : Unsigned FA QB Rodgers is supposedly in the Steelers building
Martha Careful (19-Mar) : But I don't own a car! So can I still use it in my apartment?
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : btw, new site auto updates
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : Woohoo!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / dfosterf

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

24-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

21-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.