Mucky Tundra
9 years ago
Even if he still has something in the tank, would he even consider being a 4th option behind Jordy, Cobb and Adams? I'm not against adding talent at WR since we have some question marks behind those 3 but the ship sailed on Jennings two years ago.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
DakotaT
9 years ago

I'm betting his name will come up.
In discussions.

Another team with a greater need will probably sign him for more then what Ted will offer.

Who knows, might be able to dust off the old Jersey.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



I still have that Hawk jersey to send you.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

I still have that Hawk jersey to send you.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



He's gone to Cincy can't you move on?

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Laser Gunns
9 years ago



Something else I thought to be of interest here is Jennings was listed on the transaction report as failing a physical.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



that's interesting.

i wonder how far the physical predated the trade.

Or if he really did fail it :magnifygl



MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
isocleas2
9 years ago
I'll skip over all the "he got what he deserved" talk, although I feel green bay is a little bit vindicated. Jennings still has a couple good years left in him if we didn't have Adams as an up and comer I'd say give his agent a call. But just like Andre Johnson I think the money is better spent elsewhere and the playing time is better invested in Adams.
beast
9 years ago

Something else I thought to be of interest here is Jennings was listed on the transaction report as failing a physical.

Zero2Cool wrote:


Or if he really did fail it :magnifygl

Laser Gunns wrote:



I don't know, but I remember the Hawk post cut pod cast talked about the failed physical listing, and I think (not sure) Hawk said something like they didn't give him a physical but NFL rules said teams had to list physical or not....

So I'm purely guessing that failing physical could also be code for "not given a physical" at least in the context of offseason released/cut players... but that's not an official option so they go with the closest physical option which is failed physical (since he didn't/couldn't pass the physical, that he wasn't given).


Of course Hawk noted that if he was given a physical he wouldn't pass it at the moment because he was coming off an ankle surgery but said he probably could in a couple of weeks... but I got the impression that teams also used the term "failing physical" for times when they didn't even give a physical.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

The Dolphins tried to throw huge money at Cobb... then traded their #1 WR away... I could see them (or even the Saints or Raiders) offering a cheaper contract to Jennings... and that's where Jennings wanted to go in FA a couple years ago... my understanding is Joe Philbin didn't have say so in the roster but their former GM did when Jennings was a FA. Now that they went after Cobb, I think that might suggest Philbin has more say in the roster under the new coach so maybe Jennings will find a home there.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Miami or Oakland.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
9 years ago

Even if he still has something in the tank, would he even consider being a 4th option behind Jordy, Cobb and Adams? I'm not against adding talent at WR since we have some question marks behind those 3 but the ship sailed on Jennings two years ago.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 



That's a good point. He'd be a GREAT #4, but that's what he'd be.

The biggest problem I see is that he disparaged Aaron. Hard to come back, might be awkward in the locker room.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
RaiderPride
9 years ago

Greg Jennings isn't the same player he once was. He's lost a step although still runs really good routes. That's usually what happens to players around his age. No disrespect, and appreciate his time with Packers, but I wouldn't bring him back.



What would you sign him for?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




Make me Ted and I will sign Greg Jennings... Not this year... Perhaps in a few years.. When that time comes, If I was Ted. I would sign him on a one day contract so he could retire as a Packer.






""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Mucky Tundra
9 years ago

That's a good point. He'd be a GREAT #4, but that's what he'd be.

The biggest problem I see is that he disparaged Aaron. Hard to come back, might be awkward in the locker room.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



But would he even want to be a #4 receiver? Or the 5th offensive weapon behind the other WRs and Lacy? I say no. And that's not even getting into what you pointed out.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (1h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (1h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (1h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (5h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (5h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (7h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (7h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (7h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (7h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (7h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (7h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (7h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (7h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (8h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (9h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (9h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (9h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (9h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (9h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (10h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (10h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (10h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (11h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (11h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (11h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (13h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (13h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (13h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (13h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (14h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (14h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (14h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (14h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (14h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (14h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (14h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (14h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (14h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (14h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (14h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.