Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Greg Jennings isn't the same player he once was. He's lost a step although still runs really good routes. That's usually what happens to players around his age. No disrespect, and appreciate his time with Packers, but I wouldn't bring him back.

Minnesota announced Saturday it was parting ways with Greg Jennings after two seasons

PackersNews  wrote:



What would you sign him for?
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
9 years ago
I'm going to be honest, Jennings still has it in the tank. This was in many ways a cap decision for the Vikings. If Jennings were to go back to Green Bay... he'd have to take a piece of humble pie accept being in the 3rd WR slot. I don't think he will. I plan to see him far away from the North next season
UserPostedImage
Yerko
9 years ago
From star receiver to average receiver. Guess it really does matter who your QB is. Who would have thought.

I wouldn't doubt seeing a team like the Colts or Pats adding him to their roster. He clearly still thinks he is worth more than the teams value him at as there are reports of the Vikings trying to restructure and not coming to an agreement.

Jennings got what he wanted in going to the Vikings. A big pay day.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago
I'm betting his name will come up.
In discussions.

Another team with a greater need will probably sign him for more then what Ted will offer.

Who knows, might be able to dust off the old Jersey.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
I don't see a need for him. We have Davante now.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Laser Gunns
9 years ago
Has not had a 1k yard season in like 4 years.

I wonder what his sister thinks...

I bet now, in retrospect, he wishes he'd just signed what GB offered. Both from a $$$ and production standpoint.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
beast
9 years ago
The Dolphins tried to throw huge money at Cobb... then traded their #1 WR away... I could see them (or even the Saints or Raiders) offering a cheaper contract to Jennings... and that's where Jennings wanted to go in FA a couple years ago... my understanding is Joe Philbin didn't have say so in the roster but their former GM did when Jennings was a FA. Now that they went after Cobb, I think that might suggest Philbin has more say in the roster under the new coach so maybe Jennings will find a home there.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
9 years ago

Has not had a 1k yard season in like 4 years.

Originally Posted by: Laser Gunns 



But that may not indicate the quality of player Jennings still is. His only two seasons with the Vikings have seen consistent QB turnover, and the year before that (last with the Packers) was marred by a sports hernia.

Why would the Packers want Jennings back? He'd be a pretty good stop-gap for the hole Finley's absence created in the middle of the field. I'd still think Greg is quick enough, and may still be one of the best route runners in the league. From the slot, opposite Cobb or Jordy, Greg could still do things. Heck, he could even do things as an outside receiver and free Jordy to the inside. A top four of Adams / Cobb / Jennings / Nelson might come close to rivaling the 2011 receiving crops.

Why I think, despite the above, it's unlikely the Packers bring him back? They've got good young talent at WR that you'd rather let play and develop. Janis / Abbrederis / White are all younger options with potential and speed. Maybe Richard Rodgers develops some more speed. Ted isn't exactly known for bringing in veterans at a position of strength with still developing young talent. Also, there may be too many hurt feelings with Jennings' "Packers brainwash you" comments to make a reunion possible.

My dark horse for Jennings: Dolphins. With Philbin the HC, you'd think he'd love to bring in Jennings and add another option at WR along with Stills. Also, seems like the Dolphins have no issue spending in free agency.

TL;DR: wouldn't mind Jennings, but don't see Ted bringing him back. We'll be fine without him.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Laser Gunns
9 years ago

But that may not indicate the quality of player Jennings still is. His only two seasons with the Vikings have seen consistent QB turnover, and the year before that (last with the Packers) was marred by a sports hernia.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



oh, i know he is much better than that still.

but from his perspective, wanting to be the best and such. it probably just eats him up that such a huge chunk of his career has now been pretty much wasted.

all because he wanted more money, and presumably to be the star WR of his team.

Well, The contract got cut in half, and he has not been a "star WR" since he left Green Bay.

And now he has to find another team, who probably don't have long-term plans for a 31 year old receiver, and for even less money.

---

Ted offered 8-mil a year, and Aaron Rodgers at QB.
Spielman offered 9-mil and....?


Ted's deal looks awfully good now doesn't it.

---

Edit:

I stand corrected, we offered him near 10 million/year contract extension and he refused, threw a hissy fit, and played
"not to get hurt" all year until the playoffs because he thought he would get more on the open market.

he didn't.

and when the big money was not being offered, Ted lowered his price.

and that is why he is so salty.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
I didn't like how he left so much. For a couple years I thought he was a top 10 receiver and then he started to decline. He was never a speedster and that was fine because he ran some incredible routes.

If Greg Jennings was thinking of maximizing his money, he would have taken the Packers deal. When you have no stability at QB and you're a high priced WR, you can pretty much bank on it that your contract will not see through. Thus, leaving you with less money.

I gave a good analysis on this exact thing in the Fate of Randall Cobb thread. I'm surprised more didn't pick up on it.

Something else I thought to be of interest here is Jennings was listed on the transaction report as failing a physical.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (9h) : Packers will get in
beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.