dhazer
10 years ago
we are just going to fill our defense with draft picks and let them mesh together so we should be ok in 4 years.:)




Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
10 years ago

Who says the Packers have the best of it so far? Christ, the 2015 season isn't even 6 hours old and you're freaking out like a 16 year old on prom night when her date is only 5 minutes late.

R-E-L-A-X

Let's see how things shake out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Exactly!
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
all_about_da_packers
10 years ago

I am on the Richard Rodgers bandwagon with you.

Originally Posted by: cheeseheads123 



It's interesting to view Richard Rogers stats in college: he was an absolute beast in YAC. I'm not talking like 2-3 either; I'm talking more like 7-10 YAC during his last college year. That's insane, and was amongst the best of the TE group last year (including Ebron and others).

I'm not sure what the data suggests on college production transferring into the NFL, but you assume that if it does with Rodgers, he will thrive in this offense. His body type, at least, suggests he'll be tough to bring down; then again, his last year at Cal he was much lighter than he is now.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
DarkaneRules
10 years ago
And he got SO much better as the year went on. I am sure the coaching staff saw the same if not more from him.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
all_about_da_packers
10 years ago

Ok Ted Thompson you stick to signing your guys lol, thats the reason we will always be a team that might make the playoffs but won't do much after. This puts the Seahawks back to the NFC top team. I think we will stay a top 4 team in the NFC but not the top 2.


Seahawks and Cowboys then us and Arizona


Super Bowl teams upgrade their teams by addition not by staying stagment.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



I'm curious dhazer, what do you think of Janis? I mean, do you think Janis as a raw rookie prospect in year 1 (who made plays, at least in pre-season and has an amazing physical skill set) who should develop enough to see playing time and contribute in a manner a newly added player could, or do you simply see Jeff Janis as a throwaway who doesn't matter?

Does Janis not count on the same level as an acquisition? I ask because you could argue Janis may be able to serve the same function from the slot as would a receiving TE.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
uffda udfa
10 years ago
Saints probably felt his medical was going to be an issue going forward. Nobody deals away a gamechanger like that unless there's something up.

Who else do they have on O? Methuselah Colston and Mark Ingram? Oh, and the kid, Brandin Cooks? Seems awful strange to me that they unloaded him. He's gotta be tainted meat.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


all_about_da_packers
10 years ago

Saints probably felt his medical was going to be an issue going forward. Nobody deals away a gamechanger like that unless there's something up.

Who else do they have on O? Methuselah Colston and Mark Ingram? Oh, and the kid, Brandin Cooks? Seems awful strange to me that they unloaded him. He's gotta be tainted meat.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




Or the Saints were desperate for Salary Cap space. I read somewhere that Saints were around $20 million (if not more) over the cap once the cap projection for this year came out. Apparently, Saints are still $5 million over the cap after the trade with Seattle.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
musccy
10 years ago

Or the Saints were desperate for Salary Cap space. I read somewhere that Saints were around $20 million (if not more) over the cap once the cap projection for this year came out. Apparently, Saints are still $5 million over the cap after the trade with Seattle.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Tramon is visiting them tonight, supposedly. If they cut graham for cap reasons, why bring in a cb wanting 8ish per year?
sschind
10 years ago

Saints probably felt his medical was going to be an issue going forward. Nobody deals away a gamechanger like that unless there's something up.

Who else do they have on O? Methuselah Colston and Mark Ingram? Oh, and the kid, Brandin Cooks? Seems awful strange to me that they unloaded him. He's gotta be tainted meat.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Kenny Stills will be their leading receiver this year.

all_about_da_packers
10 years ago

Tramon is visiting them tonight, supposedly. If they cut graham for cap reasons, why bring in a cb wanting 8ish per year?

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Many possible reasons exist:

1. Tramon has realized the market will not dish out $8 million for a 32 year old CB and has lowered his demands;
2. Saints want to add depth at a position they are horribly thin at;
3. Saints want to gain leverage over their starting CB Keenan Lewis who said he wants to have the remaining 3 years on his contract guaranteed or else be released (source );
4. Saints are looking to generate positive PR post-trade by bringing in a local kid; and/or
5. Saints are doing favor to Tramon's agent.

Graham still counts for for $9 million in dead money on Saints cap this year. (source )

I was mistaken in that the Saints were over the cap. They were $2.5 million under the cap as of yesterday, (source ) but that doesn't factor in the ~$1.5 million additional cap charge for trading him.

Either way, Saints are really tight under the cap and are going to need to make more moves if they want to sign Tramon. Not to mention the fact that they also need a few million in cap space to sign their draft picks. I'm not sure it's a slam dunk that Tramon is leaving, frankly.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (9m) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (10m) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (1h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (1h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (1h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (1h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (1h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (1h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (1h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (2h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (2h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (3h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (3h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (3h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.