Packnic
15 years ago

Young QB with a rocket arm and established DE coming via free agency...where have I heard this before? 8)

"rabidgopher04" wrote:





hahaha awesome.
blank
blueleopard
15 years ago
If we switch to a 3-4, I don't think any of these two become a possibility anymore.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Cheesey
15 years ago
29 is getting up there, but he could have 3 or 4 more good years in him.

I doubt we can get him though......but it would be nice.
UserPostedImage
shield4life
15 years ago
29 is young, Sign him for 5 years and let him walk after that.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago
So Peppers wants to play in a 3-4... hm, interesting.

Dom Capers helped Jason Taylor make the conversion from DE to OLB in Miami back when Taylor won the Defensive Player of the Year in 06.

I'm just sayin' maybe getting Capers in and switching to a 3-4 is something to seriously consider for Mike McCarthy and co.

Of course then the Packers might have a shot at getting Peppers, but more importantly they'd have to go out and get players experienced in playing the 3-4 to ease the transition.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Honestly, I'm fine with whatever. I could give two poops if we run a 3 - 4 or a 4 - 3 or a 2 - 5, whatever. I just want a mean rough physical defense that offenses will groan when they see us on their schedule in the coming weeks.


edit, moan to groan so Bozz doesnt get so excited 😉
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
15 years ago
moan?
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago
Obviously you attempt to sign Julius Peppers. Same with Albert Haynesworth and money talks. Pay them and they'd sign here.

Julius Peppers is getting awful advice if the report of a 3-4 preference is true. He can go and try the 3-4, but he's not built like a 3-4 outside linebacker. Peppers is pushing about 285 pounds. That's a DE in the 3-4 and even then I don't think he's as effective.

Jason Taylor was 260 to 270 tops and quicker on his feet. Plus Nick Saban basically ran a hybrid defense. Even Aaron Kampman is about 270 and he can't play in the 3-4 at least on paper.

Basically I'm hoping the report is bogus or his agent doesn't know what he's talking about. I think once scouts talk to Peppers and his agent, he'll come to his senses.

I could do without Jonathan Vilma because I really don't' think he's the same player he once was and your going to cut Nick Barnett or A.J. Hawk now? That's what it takes. It just seems a little bit much in my opinion and Vilma is not a 3-4 linebacker. That's why the Jets got rid of him in the first place so if Green Bay goes in that direction they're stuck with a bunch of backers who don't' fit the system.
Mortfini
15 years ago
i think we would need to sort out if we where playing a 3-4 or a 4-3 before going after Vilma he was a flop at the jets cos they play a 3-4
UserPostedImage
evad04
15 years ago
You can add 3-4 NT to the potential additions. We'd need one.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (12m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (12m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (20m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (21m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (41m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.