shield4life
16 years ago
Well we all know both we're top candidates to be the Packers d/c. Now what I think is that Mike McCarthy / Ted Thompson we're not to sold on turning the 4-3 into a 3-4. We all know that both of those coaches would prefer to use a 3-4. If the Packer's we're too change into a 3-4 this off-season we would surely see a similliar defense as this year due to a new scheme and inexperience at it. That's the reason I think they decided to go elsewhere. I think they saw that Ted Thompson / Mike McCarthy would rather have a 4-3 defense and they would rather run a 3-4. So they decided to sign else where. I mean 4-3 is a good scheme and I'd much run a 4-3 but ... you need a smart d/c for a 4-3 that knows what there doing.

Any thoughts?
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
bozz_2006
16 years ago
I don't know if that makes sense. Word is that the Packers offered Williams a contract, and he used it as leverage to get more money out of New Orleans.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
16 years ago
Personally, I think it had to do more with fitting in with the team.

For Nolan, coaching here would mean coaching under a former employee.. in the world of egos and publicity, I can see Nolan avoiding that uncomfortable feeling of the roles reversed.

With Williams, whom really knows.. maybe the weather. Two equal jobs and probably pay.. one located in the far North, the other in the Far south.. for me, I hate hot sticky weather, so the choice would be simple. Whom knows with Gregg.

Or maybe it was the structure in Green Bay, Mike McCarthy is pretty strict in letting his assistants get much air time in front of the camera.. If Gregg has aspirations of being a HC again.. he needs to be seen as well.

Maybe it was the roster.. the Saints have a dynamic front four, but behind it, they need a makeover... maybe Gregg feels more comfortable in having a say in the players added to that mix.. more turnover in the roster and depth chart then here in Green Bay... we need an influx of talent in the box and need to max the potential of the players there.. but less of a hand will be given in adding players.

Then there is this.. Sanders had this defense playing decent ball in 07... so there are some expectations that the pieces and players are here.. With the Saints, they haven't had a great defense since the days of those excellent linebackers they had once upon a time spearheaded by Ricky Jackson.. so there is less expectations and he will look like a bigger hero in getting that unit turned around. Always helps if you want another shot at becoming a head coach again..

In the end.. both Nolan and Williams made a choice that works for them.. all my above is just guesses. That is all we have, unless we could sit down with them for a spell and have them honestly tell us the reason behind the choice.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

I don't know if that makes sense. Word is that the Packers offered Williams a contract, and he used it as leverage to get more money out of New Orleans.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

The word with that though is they offered him a contract the day before they interviewed him. I do not trust that word.
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
16 years ago
That's what AADP stated, if I remember correctly. That is not the way I remember it. Sorry, no link.
UserPostedImage
beast
16 years ago

what I think is that Mike McCarthy / Ted Thompson we're not to sold on turning the 4-3 into a 3-4.

"krazygangsta" wrote:




Well Williams usually runs an attacking 4-3 defense, so that theory is not true for him.

As for Nolan rumor is he thought McCarthy just thought they would give him the job and somewhere down the line Thompson and Nolan got PO'ed at him and said it's not happening. (but that is just a rumor as far as I know)

Also hasn't Nolan run some 4-3 defense in the past?
UserPostedImage
shield4life
16 years ago
lol bozz that's not official thing, it's just my opinion on it unless there's a way I could link my brain ... no but seriously it was just a thought of the reason they may have decided not to come.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
bozz_2006
16 years ago
your thoughts are definitely plausible. Who the hell knows? Maybe they just don't like the color green.... lol
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
16 years ago

The word with that though is they offered him a contract the day before they interviewed him. I do not trust that word.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Williams was interviewed by Mike McCarthy on January 8. Bob McGinn confirmed this. Based on what I read, Mike McCarthy offered Williams a contract following his interview, which would have been on January 8...

Meanwhile, Williams let another day pass without making a decision on his future. He was interviewed by McCarthy on Jan. 8.

An NFL source with knowledge of Williams' intentions said it was his impression that Williams was leaning more toward New Orleans or Tennessee than Green Bay.



McGinn's article 


When I post something that is speculation, rest assured my sources are far far more competent than JA or RH.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
16 years ago

lol bozz that's not official thing, it's just my opinion on it unless there's a way I could link my brain ... no but seriously it was just a thought of the reason they may have decided not to come.

"krazygangsta" wrote:



There are a lot of rumours; if posters at PC are to be believed then Mike Nolan did not become DC because Ted Thompson forced Mike McCarthy to interview more people, delaying the hire. This eventually let to Nolan getting another job.

If more reputable people are to be believed, like certain beat writers, than Mike McCarthy favoured Nolan, but always wanted to have a thorough process, and losing Nolan was the result of Mike McCarthy not wanting to rush into anything. That and Mike Nolan didn't want to move to Green Bay, preferring to stay out on the West Coast, closer to his home in the Bay Area.


They lost Greg Williams simply because he didn't want to come to Green Bay (well at least it wasn't his first choice).
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (48m) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (1h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (1h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (3h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (7h) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.