Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Seems like strange reasoning to me. From what I've seen, people get rather annoyed if they have to work ridiculously hard, while co-workers just phone it in. Projecting that to your situation, would only make me more annoyed, really.

Thing is, I don't want four families who are deservedly on welfare, cut, because one douche takes advantage of the system. I'm all for motivation and (re)education, but preferably in a humane way.

Our government, right now, is forcing people on welfare, who have been out of a job for longer than a certain period of time, to work for free. What they've managed to do so far is get more people on welfare, because the free workforce is taking up jobs that normally would've been filled by a regular employee. Nice on paper, but a poor idea.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



It seems strange for someone to want those who need assistance, get assistance, and those who could support themselves receive the necessities they need to do as such?

I've worked "ridiculously hard" while co-workers phoned it in and I dealt with it. When it came time for reviews, I got a raise, they did not. When it came time for promotions, I was considered and offered, they were not. I don't worry about how hard the guy next to me is working, but rather focus on working to my best. Some of the plants I worked in I had co-workers tell me to stop working so hard because it was making them look bad and I was setting the bench marks to high for them. Unfortunately in my early 20's some of those jobs were with people who came in to work hung over, or still drunk. Those are the people I have little remorse for. If you're on drugs, a drinker, then those people need the necessary help to get them off that track.

---

I don't know, I guess trying to make this point to those who are too worried about labeling and putting people in boxes is just not something worth the time.

UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

Please give me details on how exactly your views differ at all from the libreral democrats?
Funny thing is, the Clintons, the Obamas, and the list could go on and on, are filthy rich. Yes, filthy rich liberals.
Why arn't they handing out THEIR money to the less fortunate?
Yet you keep bringing up "evil rich republicans" as if money/rich is automatically republicans and evil.
What about all the filthy rich hollywood Libs?
I know....ignore them. They won't help you try to make your attempted points.
When I had money, I tried to help people.
I'm not stating it for a pat on the back, just to show you conservatives have hearts too.it might not fit your preconceived idea, but it's true.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Because they don't cut social programs unless they are forced to make a deal with the evil people you support. They also don't hypocritically thump a bible in anybody's face and not understand what they are talking about. That goes solely to those teatard Republicans you applaud.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

It seems strange for someone to want those who need assistance, get assistance, and those who could support themselves receive the necessities they need to do as such?

I've worked "ridiculously hard" while co-workers phoned it in and I dealt with it. When it came time for reviews, I got a raise, they did not. When it came time for promotions, I was considered and offered, they were not. I don't worry about how hard the guy next to me is working, but rather focus on working to my best. Some of the plants I worked in I had co-workers tell me to stop working so hard because it was making them look bad and I was setting the bench marks to high for them. Unfortunately in my early 20's some of those jobs were with people who came in to work hung over, or still drunk. Those are the people I have little remorse for. If you're on drugs, a drinker, then those people need the necessary help to get them off that track.

---

I don't know, I guess trying to make this point to those who are too worried about labeling and putting people in boxes is just not something worth the time.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Funny how we have completely different perceptions of "working ridiculously hard". You think it is doing the normal steps of being raised in a good home, going to college, and building a career. I think of migrant Mexican immigrants picking vegetables in +90 degree heat for 12 hours and getting paid dog shit for their efforts. Guess who I have a higher regard for?


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago
And yet they keep flooding over the boarder like a tsunami. I guess half wages and no bennys in the US is a hell of a lot better than where they came from. Huh. The US for all its faults isn't as horrible as some make it out to be.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Today, I stopped caring about my fellow man. I stopped caring about my community, my neighbors, and those I serve.

I stopped caring today because a once noble profession has become despised, hated, distrusted, and mostly unwanted.

I stopped caring today because parents refuse to teach their kids right from wrong and blame us when they are caught breaking the law. I stopped caring today because parents tell their little kids to be good or “the police will take you away” embedding a fear from year-one. Moms hate us in their schools because we frighten them and remind them of the evil that lurks in the world. They would rather we stay unseen, but close by if needed, but readily available to “fix their kid”.

I stopped caring today because we work to keep our streets safe from mayhem in the form of reckless, drunk, high, or speeding drivers, only to be hated for it, yet hated even more because we didn't catch the drunk before he killed someone they may know. Never less, we are just another tool used by government to generate "revenue".

I stopped caring today because Liberals hate the police as we carry guns, scare kids, and take away their drugs. We always kill innocent people with unjust violence. We are called bullies for using a taser during a fight, but are condemned further for not first tasing the guy who pulls a gun on us. And if we do have to shoot, we are asked “why didn’t you just shoot the gun out of their hand?” And when one of us is killed by the countless attacks that do happen (but are rarely reported in the mainstream media) the haters say, "Its just part of the job".

I stopped caring today because Conservatives hate us as we are “the Government”. We try to take away their guns, freedoms, and liberty at every turn. We represent a “Police State” where “jackbooted-badge wearing thugs” randomly attack innocent people without cause or concern for constitutional rights. We are Waco, Ruby Ridge, and Rodney King all rolled into one lone police officer stopping to help change an old lady's tire.

I stopped caring today as no one wants us around, but instantly demands answers, results, arrests, when a crime takes place. If a crime isn't solved within the allocated 60 minutes it takes CSI on television, we are inept, incompetent, or covering something up. If we do get “lucky” it was just that and everyone with a Facebook account can post wonderful comments of how “they” would solve the case and how “we” and not nearly as clever.

I stopped caring today because a video of a cop six states away, from a department that you never heard of, screws up and forgets his oath of honor, thus firing up an internet lynch-mob of cop haters because “we all do the same things” even though 99% of us work twice as hard not to end up in the news and to still be “the good guys”. We are "militarized" because we wear body armor and kevlar helmets when shots are fired or rocks thrown at us and carry scary looking rifles even though everyone knows that they are easier to shoot and are more accurate than a handgun or a shotgun.

I stopped caring today because the culture of today’s instantly connected youth is only there to take and never give back. To never accept responsibility for ones actions, but to blame everyone else instead of themselves. To ask “what is in it for me?” versus “what can I do for you?” To idolize gangsters, thugs, sexual promiscuous behavoir, and criminals over hard work, dedication, and achievement. To argue that getting stoned should be a right, yet getting a job or an education is a hassle. To steal verus earn. To hate versus help.

Yes, I stopped caring today.

But tomorrow, I will put my uniform back on,.................... and I will care again.

Lt. Daniel Furseth
DeForest Police (WI)

Lt. Daniel Furseth wrote:


UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
10 years ago
I wonder what would happen if when criticizing others, we each as individuals stopped using the words "we," "they," "us," and "them" altogether and instead always insisted on saying "I," "me," or (singular form of) "you"?

Or even better, "Wade," "Kevin," "Dave," "Ray," "Troy," "Alan," etc.

Would that be better?

Would we each as individuals criticize more or less?

Would we each as individuals be more or less justified in the criticisms we make?

Would we each as individuals listen more or less to the criticisms?

Would we each as individuals be more or less transparent about our individual lives?

Or would we each as individuals end up taking too much offense too often?

What would happen if we each as individuals tried this?

Signed,
Wade the individual
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago

I wonder what would happen if when criticizing others, we each as individuals stopped using the words "we," "they," "us," and "them" altogether and instead always insisted on saying "I," "me," or (singular form of) "you"?

Or even better, "Wade," "Kevin," "Dave," "Ray," "Troy," "Alan," etc.

Would that be better?

Would we each as individuals criticize more or less?

Would we each as individuals be more or less justified in the criticisms we make?

Would we each as individuals listen more or less to the criticisms?

Would we each as individuals be more or less transparent about our individual lives?

Or would we each as individuals end up taking too much offense too often?

What would happen if we each as individuals tried this?

Signed,
Wade the individual

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Nothing YOU or anybody says about ME means a thing unless I Myself believe it.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago
really.
It is from the IRS so it must be right.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
10 years ago

Nothing YOU or anybody says about ME means a thing unless I Myself believe it.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



True. But if I make the argument against you as an individual, vs. against you as an example of a group, am I more or less likely to convince you to believe?

Please be clear here: I don't know what the answer to this question of mine, or those I asked in my previous post.

I only know that I'd rather people criticize me because of what I myself have done (and trust me, there's no shortage of things *I've* done that are worthy of criticism), than criticize me because I'm the member of a particular category or because I'm somehow "like" other people who have done worthy-of-criticism things (that I haven't myself done).

And I'm wondering whether things would be improved if we tossed groups and categories out of the story altogether. I remember a while back, for example, when Foster tried to get across the problem with attacks ad hominem. I learned the same thing he did, and I agreed with him at the time. But I wonder if the problem with attacks ad hominem isn't the problem so much as the fact that we like to make attacks ad hominem that do nothing but point to the attacked person's membership in a particular group/category.

"I shouldn't listen to you because YOU are an asshole" and "I shouldn't listen to you because YOU are a member of a group all of whom are assholes" are arguments that are different in kind. Which kind of argument is worse? Which is least likely to lead a discussion in a valuable direction? Which is most likely to lead it in a direction that makes things worse?

Again, I don't know the answer. For some reason, however, I'm starting to think it's a really important answer to find.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

really.
It is from the IRS so it must be right.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



What's your point? They make all the money, shouldn't they be paying 71% of the income tax? Do you have a chart on how much they shelter or flat evade? How about a chart for how much money would be in our treasury if the cap on SS would be eliminated or capital gains income was subject to the regular income tax.

You just made the simpleton argument to appease simpleton minds.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (17h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (17h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Rude!
beast (21h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

17h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.