Zero2Cool
11 years ago

GREEN BAY — Matt Flynn isn't sure who would have said it, but the Green Bay Packers new/old backup quarterback took exception to the claim that he didn't work hard after signing a free-agent contract with the Seattle Seahawks in March 2012.

Flynn, who left Green Bay for a three-year, $26 million deal ($10 million guaranteed), was beaten out by then-rookie Russell Wilson last year in training camp. This spring, Seahawks general manager John Schneider, a former Packers director of football operations, traded him to Oakland, where another ex-Packers director of football operations, Reggie McKenzie, is the general manager. Oakland cut Flynn Oct. 7, and Flynn signed with the Buffalo Bills on Oct. 14. The Bills released him on Nov. 4.

The Packers signed Flynn to a one-year, minimum-salary deal on Tuesday to back up Scott Tolzien, who'll start in place of an injured Aaron Rodgers on Sunday against the New York Giants.

In a Nov. 9 story by veteran NFL writer Bob McGinn in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel , Flynn's work habits were called into question by sources.

"Sources said the major reason Seattle gave the job to Russell Wilson in 2012 and then traded Flynn to Oakland was commitment," McGinn wrote. "Flynn, according to sources, became a 9-to-5er and, not only was he outperformed, he also was outworked. One Seahawks teammate did say Flynn was a master on the ping-pong table. In Oakland, the combination of Flynn's mediocre work habits and an awful showing Sept. 29 in a start against Washington led GM Reggie McKenzie to cut him."

When those anonymous quotes were brought up to Flynn after much of the large crowd around him at his locker had dispersed Wednesday, he vehemently denied that he didn't work hard in Seattle.

"Anybody who says I'm a 9-to-5er is ignorant, just straight forward. I work as hard as anybody does," Flynn said. "I don't try to rub it anybody's faces or do it in front of coaches to make a point that I study. I do my job. I go about my business as a professional.

"I'm never going to have a moment where I don't know what I'm supposed to do. It kind of gets to me a little bit that anybody would say that because that's just an ignorant comment."

Asked if he regretted anything he did in Seattle or Oakland, the 28-year-old Flynn said no.

"I have no regrets about the things I did preparation-wise, knowing what to do," said Flynn, who threw just nine regular-season passes in Seattle and 34 in Oakland, where he started only one game. "Obviously, looking back at games, you wish you had made a throw here or there, but I don't have any regrets about the decisions I made to go places or how I prepare. That's just straight forward. I prepare my tail off and the things that I knew, that I needed to do ... For whatever reason, it didn't work out. There are a lot of factors that go into that. Just didn't work out."

Jason Wilde  wrote:


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
11 years ago
Between this and the other stories about Tolzien having lived at the Niners facility for two weeks, and the one on PFT about how they love his work ethic, it seems to me somebody in the Packers organization is trying to send Flynn a message.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DoddPower
11 years ago
Of course he lost the starting job in Seattle. Flynn is obviously not as good as Russell Wilson, no matter how hard he worked. In that case, the best man won. I didn't follow the Flynn saga much after that, but Pryor has some amazing mobility, which is very useful behind a horrible offensive line and very few offensive weapons. Not to mention the whole new team thing. I think the Bills situation was blurred by injury.

Flynn maximizes his talent, he just doesn't have a lot of it relative to other starting NFL QBs. He does make a nice back up, though, and I'd venture to say, when healthy, he's one of the better back up QB's in the league . . . at least in the right system and the right people around him. Hopefully he'll stick around with the Packers.
Fan Shout
beast (6h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (11h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (12h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (22h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (22h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (23h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8h / Random Babble / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.