What's wrong with Gay marriage?· Page 31

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

This war mongering fascist retard would like to send about 75 cents of every dollar we spend supporting the lazy do-nothing entitlement gobbling government tit-sucking opportunist non working motherf*ckers in this country to those that really have no opportunity overseas that the people that you send to war see all the time. Of course, this would impinge upon the oh so-deserving Native Americans that lost a hundred and twenty years ago and are still sucking on the gov't tit for doing so , for example, so we can't have that.

You'd get 3 hots and a cot every day until you picked yourself up if I was running the show.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

You work at the Home Depot, what exactly are you going to be running?

And those Natives you hate so much, yeah, that's shut up money from guilty people. Can't wait until reparations for the blacks kick in so I can watch retards like you blow gaskets.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#302

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I got the Garden Dept in Harrisburg covered. I'm still more qualified to be president than the guy you elected.

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#303

Well, I guess this all explains a lot of the conversation in Chat hahahaha. I guess I should have come here first, but when I tuned in, that was the first thing that came on.

First of all, to clarify, regarding Pack93's post and my reply, it was his WORDS - which I quoted - that I referred to as "pathetic". If the guy is that thin-skinned, that distinction probably doesn't make a difference, but just saying ......

It really seems that the whiny leftists - both the sinister variety and the do-gooder variety - want to have all the rights/benefits/etc. of the Constitution, laws enacted, and whatever else - strictly apply to every rotten belief, behavior, group, etc. that is dedicated to changing/tearing down anything American, anything Christian, anything good in general - and honestly, this is America, and I don't have a problem with that. HOWEVER, those very same varieties of leftist absolutely do NOT want to let those same rights/benefits/etc. apply to the huge majority of Good Normal Pro-American people in this country. One needs only read the post of this fly by night anti-American/anti-Christian loser who chimed in like a drive by shooter to see that. (note: just so there is no misunderstanding, I mean Dingus, not Pack93.)

This applies to the topic of the thread in that the good people merely taking the position of the Bible/merely taking the position that almost everywhere else both geographically and in history has been considered THE sane normal moral way, THOSE people are berated, called bigots, etc. - while those supporting what Biblically speaking is an abomination, and throughout history has been considered weird and perverted, THEY suddenly are portrayed as ...... something other than weird and perverted. I say there is something wrong with that picture.

And then somebody who supposedly has a reputation for being "above" it all - not expressing opinions (yeah right), and says our majority Christian TRUE CORRECT beliefs are no better than anybody else's, and that is somehow considered profound or whatever? I don't think so.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

dingus
Member

10 years ago

#304

Hey texas-
I'm not anti-christian nor am I anti-American. I'm actually quite fond of what America is supposed to be.

How can wanting everyone to share the same rights and privileges be anti-American. Isn't there something about ALL men being created equal in the Declaration of Independence?

Where's the part that says "as stated in the bible" in that document?

Come to think of it, when is the bible even mentioned in those pages? I seem to recall something about the seperation of church and state being mentioned but that must have been included in the copy that they give to anti-american losers, right?

Can you send me a copy of the TRUE CORRECT beliefs so I can be as loving and caring as someone like you?

Can you also get me some more information on the sane normal moral way to live my life? Again, I thought it had something to do with that "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" stuff. Maybe I was wrong.

I so want to be one of the Good Normal Americans, could you let me know which humans/ethnic groups/sexualities I have to hate so I can be one like you?

Or should I believe in that saying "judge not lest ye be judged"? What moron said that?

You are a christian in name only. I've been reading your drivel since you showed up and most of the time I just shake my head at your ignorance, bigotry and hatred and move on. Every so often I pipe up mostly to amuse myself. Then I go back to reading some fun and entertaining takes on my favorite football team from some pretty funny and passionate fans. You can call me a loser or anti-christian or anti-american all you want, it makes no difference to me. I just revel in the fact that I've never once said anything as hateful or ignorant or bigoted and then hid behind a book to justify my beliefs.

blank

Gilligan
Member

10 years ago

#305

Pack93z and Texas are not stupid men, I promise you that much.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

Well, you got one out of two correct on that one Gunner.

I have been on here but a short time and I had not seen much posted by Pack93z, so I went back and reviewed some of his comments and thoughts on various topics.
The man is very well versed and knowledgeable when it comes to football and in life's journey, his insight is thoughtful, wise and his perspective is pretty much "dead nuts on".

As to TexasPackerBacker, well he is long on the mouth and very short on anything of substance. Just ignorance and bigotry, a waste of skin if you will.
To put it another way, the only hope for TexasPackerBacker is if he were to have a navelplex .

Pack93z is the type of guy that you would enjoy sitting down and having a few beers with.
On the other hand, TexasPackerBacker is the type of guy that you wouldn't piss on even if he were on fire.

I am chosen by many but taken by no one.

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#306

I certainly am not pissed.. upset nor thin skinned. lol.. not in the least.

I just personally hold little regard for Texas's opinion of myself, my intelligence nor my beliefs and core values. I am good with that, truly I am. I truly don't care if he criticizes my words or thoughts, it is his right to do so and this is the back alley at its current form. He is free to hold his opinion, as we all are.

But for me, in seeing his entire body of work displayed here, I am very secure with disagreeing with most of what he holds to be correct. The fact that he cannot hold a conversation for more than a couple of posts without some type of jabbing comment to me tells me all I need to know about the man. Repeatedly.

And rest assured.. I slept fine last night holding that opinion.

Not sure what stuck the conversation in chat, Foster thanks but no worries mate.

Back to the topic, Texas, you railed on the current laws, would that not be the point of the 14th amendment, the core foundations of this country, to strike any law opposing gay marriage as unconstitutional? Seems to me it did the same for interracial marriage, so riddle me the difference?

As far as this further destroying the foundation of this country, you really want to prompt this up as a banner for that? With the rampant greed in this country and this government, you want to fall back on this argument? Homosexuality is, at the very least, mildly contradicted in the bible; greed is not.

Matthew 19:21
Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”

But regardless.. I think, with as diverse as this country is, and with the underlying notion laid out in the first amendment, there shall be "wall of separation between church and state". How is it relevant to argue the point in the first place?

Like it or not, the Constitution and the wisdom of the founders to write the amendments, set forth his country to be a free one. It is hard pressed to bring in the argument of Judeo-Christian beliefs into the discussion. But I understand.. you have little else to argue on the point.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#307

Originally Posted by: dingus

I know.. color it an illness, but I was thinking about the thread on the way into work this morning after dropping a comment and cleaning up some SPAM.

I was going to add one more comment.. but then I read your post, and it about sums up everything I was going to add. Thanks.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#308

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

As for whether or not you are or were "pissed", I got in on the tail end of a discussion in Chat where others were saying that - I didn't even know it was you they meant until Foster explained. I guess I should have read in here first. Suddenly I'm being told you run the place, and I better kiss up to you - yeah right to that! If you are now deeming to come down from your pedestal get in on this dirty arguing with us peasants, I'm all for it. Glad to hear you are so secure hahahaha. Usually, people who see fit to say how secure they are, aren't - but I'm sure that ain't you.

I wish my "body of work" would be easily displayed hahahaha. I think that would clearly show that with very rare exceptions, I have been fairly respectful and civil even after the onslaught of other than that, and that I dutifully reply to virtually every detail of contrary posts (on that one, I give you plus points also). Furthermore, I consistently stand for the solid views of the majority in this country - what I call Good Normal Americans. While you may not be among the really hard core anti-American/anti-Christian "change mongers" (like the next guy I will be replying to), you do certainly strike me as in the naive do-gooder category that soaks up the shit put out by their side and then spews it back in a slightly more mild form.

Glad to see also that you are in favor of upholding my right - of free speech in this case. That, as I will go into more detail about in the next post replying to Dingus, is what it is all about - the fact that most on your side of the spectrum do NOT - they do their best to shut up and shut down the free speech, etc. of their opposition - most of which is just the Good Normal Americans speaking out in favor of the good normal traditional way of life in this country - which in this thread is ANTI-homosexual marriage. You don't believe what I just said? Just consider the mountain of CRAP that comes down on anybody standing up for traditional NORMALCY - calling abomination and perversion what it is and always has been.

Where were we? Oh yeah, back on the topic of the thread: I SERIOUSLY doubt the writers of the 14th Amendment - or the Founding Fathers themselves, for that matter, had homosexuals in mind hahahaha. You wouldn't even make THAT argument, would you? Just the same, their right to practice their perversion, I suppose, is protected too- even though a lot of other perversions are not - another example where "equal treatment under the law" in the eyes of some, is only equal for those they deem to be worthy of it. Oh well. The pendulum has swung way in one direction now; Who knows what a generation or two in the future will bring us. Maybe you do-gooders will decide the Sharia Law believers should have equal treatment of their beliefs too hahahaha - where would that leave the poor homosexuals - or the poor women for that matter?

As I have said repeatedly, this whole "gay marriage" topic seems insignificant to me - I'll argue it if that's the game of the week, but their really ain't much substance to it. I suppose even my beliefs have evolved - not to where I don't see homosexuality as exactly the abomination the Bible says it is, but to where I can easily overlook it and let them - most of whom, ironically, are probably good normal people in most other ways - practice their perversion in peace. Other than the old "wrath of God on the whole country" argument, it really ain't gonna make any difference to me one way or the other - yet we drag on the discussion about it hahahaha.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#309

Get down off my pedestal ... lol... all I can do it laugh.

I see you are down with the topic as there is little left for you to argue against in other than religious connotations. The framers of the Constitution and initial amendments knew one thing, that the country would evolve.. and they tried their best to frame the foundation of the country to allow it to do so. It is the beauty of it.. did they intend for it to include homosexuality to be a foundation for marriage? Probably not. But they tried their best to ensure that the government would not use it against them. Equal rights for each.

Same could be said for equality for women; something that was fought and eventually overturned. Same with race. And the country still has a ways to go in those areas in true equality.. but from a legal standpoint they are to be treated equally. This issue will slowly evolve that way.

I will agree though, in comparison to other issues facing this nation, it might not be a priority but honestly those fighting in with such rigor is the reason it is still an issue. It will be appealed again and again as they continue to fight it.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#310

Get down off my pedestal ... lol... all I can do it laugh.

I see you are down with the topic as there is little left for you to argue against in other than religious connotations. The framers of the Constitution and initial amendments knew one thing, that the country would evolve.. and they tried their best to frame the foundation of the country to allow it to do so. It is the beauty of it.. did they intend for it to include homosexuality to be a foundation for marriage? Probably not. But they tried their best to ensure that the government would not use it against them. Equal rights for each.

Same could be said for equality for women; something that was fought and eventually overturned. Same with race. And the country is still has a ways to go in those areas in true equality.. but from a legal standpoint they are to be treated equally. This issue will slowly evolve that way.

I will agree though, in comparison to other issues facing this nation, it might not be a priority but honestly those fighting in with such rigor is the reason it is still an issue. It will be appealed again and again as they continue to fight it.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

As for that pedestal, I was told you rarely see fit to express an opinion, which mostly seems accurate based on what I have seen also. That to see you rolling in the Back Alley mud with the rest of us hahahaha.

I would definitely argue that the Founding Fathers didn't have a clue - that All MEN ...... included the unequipped half of the population, much less those inverting the use of that equipment. Hell, they barely tolerated riff-raff who didn't own land, and only considered blacks 3/5 human because the South wanted more representation. Their specialty was designing a government that would protect against enemies, but not get in their way otherwise i.e. avoid change mongering hahahaha. All in all, with a little bit of fine tuning, it has worked out all right, but I would stop way short of infusing them with the foresight a lot of people think. The courts and legislatures have seen fit to decide which pigs are a little more equal than the others, but whatever.

One point you made that still needs comment , though: about those fighting with such rigor (I think you meant vigor - rigor is stiff like a dead person hahahaha), you are right EXCEPT it ain't the homosexuals themeselves trying to inflict their perversion on the general population; It's the damn non-homosexual left - about half of which are naive do-gooders like you, and the other half hard core leftist zealots, out to CHANGE America from the magnificent place it is to the dung heap they think it could be.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS