What's wrong with Gay marriage?· Page 31

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

This war mongering fascist retard would like to send about 75 cents of every dollar we spend supporting the lazy do-nothing entitlement gobbling government tit-sucking opportunist non working motherf*ckers in this country to those that really have no opportunity overseas that the people that you send to war see all the time. Of course, this would impinge upon the oh so-deserving Native Americans that lost a hundred and twenty years ago and are still sucking on the gov't tit for doing so , for example, so we can't have that.

You'd get 3 hots and a cot every day until you picked yourself up if I was running the show.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

You work at the Home Depot, what exactly are you going to be running?

And those Natives you hate so much, yeah, that's shut up money from guilty people. Can't wait until reparations for the blacks kick in so I can watch retards like you blow gaskets.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#302

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I got the Garden Dept in Harrisburg covered. I'm still more qualified to be president than the guy you elected.

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#303

Well, I guess this all explains a lot of the conversation in Chat hahahaha. I guess I should have come here first, but when I tuned in, that was the first thing that came on.

First of all, to clarify, regarding Pack93's post and my reply, it was his WORDS - which I quoted - that I referred to as "pathetic". If the guy is that thin-skinned, that distinction probably doesn't make a difference, but just saying ......

It really seems that the whiny leftists - both the sinister variety and the do-gooder variety - want to have all the rights/benefits/etc. of the Constitution, laws enacted, and whatever else - strictly apply to every rotten belief, behavior, group, etc. that is dedicated to changing/tearing down anything American, anything Christian, anything good in general - and honestly, this is America, and I don't have a problem with that. HOWEVER, those very same varieties of leftist absolutely do NOT want to let those same rights/benefits/etc. apply to the huge majority of Good Normal Pro-American people in this country. One needs only read the post of this fly by night anti-American/anti-Christian loser who chimed in like a drive by shooter to see that. (note: just so there is no misunderstanding, I mean Dingus, not Pack93.)

This applies to the topic of the thread in that the good people merely taking the position of the Bible/merely taking the position that almost everywhere else both geographically and in history has been considered THE sane normal moral way, THOSE people are berated, called bigots, etc. - while those supporting what Biblically speaking is an abomination, and throughout history has been considered weird and perverted, THEY suddenly are portrayed as ...... something other than weird and perverted. I say there is something wrong with that picture.

And then somebody who supposedly has a reputation for being "above" it all - not expressing opinions (yeah right), and says our majority Christian TRUE CORRECT beliefs are no better than anybody else's, and that is somehow considered profound or whatever? I don't think so.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

dingus
Member

10 years ago

#304

Hey texas-
I'm not anti-christian nor am I anti-American. I'm actually quite fond of what America is supposed to be.

How can wanting everyone to share the same rights and privileges be anti-American. Isn't there something about ALL men being created equal in the Declaration of Independence?

Where's the part that says "as stated in the bible" in that document?

Come to think of it, when is the bible even mentioned in those pages? I seem to recall something about the seperation of church and state being mentioned but that must have been included in the copy that they give to anti-american losers, right?

Can you send me a copy of the TRUE CORRECT beliefs so I can be as loving and caring as someone like you?

Can you also get me some more information on the sane normal moral way to live my life? Again, I thought it had something to do with that "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" stuff. Maybe I was wrong.

I so want to be one of the Good Normal Americans, could you let me know which humans/ethnic groups/sexualities I have to hate so I can be one like you?

Or should I believe in that saying "judge not lest ye be judged"? What moron said that?

You are a christian in name only. I've been reading your drivel since you showed up and most of the time I just shake my head at your ignorance, bigotry and hatred and move on. Every so often I pipe up mostly to amuse myself. Then I go back to reading some fun and entertaining takes on my favorite football team from some pretty funny and passionate fans. You can call me a loser or anti-christian or anti-american all you want, it makes no difference to me. I just revel in the fact that I've never once said anything as hateful or ignorant or bigoted and then hid behind a book to justify my beliefs.

blank

Gilligan
Member

10 years ago

#305

Pack93z and Texas are not stupid men, I promise you that much.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

Well, you got one out of two correct on that one Gunner.

I have been on here but a short time and I had not seen much posted by Pack93z, so I went back and reviewed some of his comments and thoughts on various topics.
The man is very well versed and knowledgeable when it comes to football and in life's journey, his insight is thoughtful, wise and his perspective is pretty much "dead nuts on".

As to TexasPackerBacker, well he is long on the mouth and very short on anything of substance. Just ignorance and bigotry, a waste of skin if you will.
To put it another way, the only hope for TexasPackerBacker is if he were to have a navelplex .

Pack93z is the type of guy that you would enjoy sitting down and having a few beers with.
On the other hand, TexasPackerBacker is the type of guy that you wouldn't piss on even if he were on fire.

I am chosen by many but taken by no one.

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#306

I certainly am not pissed.. upset nor thin skinned. lol.. not in the least.

I just personally hold little regard for Texas's opinion of myself, my intelligence nor my beliefs and core values. I am good with that, truly I am. I truly don't care if he criticizes my words or thoughts, it is his right to do so and this is the back alley at its current form. He is free to hold his opinion, as we all are.

But for me, in seeing his entire body of work displayed here, I am very secure with disagreeing with most of what he holds to be correct. The fact that he cannot hold a conversation for more than a couple of posts without some type of jabbing comment to me tells me all I need to know about the man. Repeatedly.

And rest assured.. I slept fine last night holding that opinion.

Not sure what stuck the conversation in chat, Foster thanks but no worries mate.

Back to the topic, Texas, you railed on the current laws, would that not be the point of the 14th amendment, the core foundations of this country, to strike any law opposing gay marriage as unconstitutional? Seems to me it did the same for interracial marriage, so riddle me the difference?

As far as this further destroying the foundation of this country, you really want to prompt this up as a banner for that? With the rampant greed in this country and this government, you want to fall back on this argument? Homosexuality is, at the very least, mildly contradicted in the bible; greed is not.

Matthew 19:21
Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”

But regardless.. I think, with as diverse as this country is, and with the underlying notion laid out in the first amendment, there shall be "wall of separation between church and state". How is it relevant to argue the point in the first place?

Like it or not, the Constitution and the wisdom of the founders to write the amendments, set forth his country to be a free one. It is hard pressed to bring in the argument of Judeo-Christian beliefs into the discussion. But I understand.. you have little else to argue on the point.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#307

Originally Posted by: dingus

I know.. color it an illness, but I was thinking about the thread on the way into work this morning after dropping a comment and cleaning up some SPAM.

I was going to add one more comment.. but then I read your post, and it about sums up everything I was going to add. Thanks.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#308

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

As for whether or not you are or were "pissed", I got in on the tail end of a discussion in Chat where others were saying that - I didn't even know it was you they meant until Foster explained. I guess I should have read in here first. Suddenly I'm being told you run the place, and I better kiss up to you - yeah right to that! If you are now deeming to come down from your pedestal get in on this dirty arguing with us peasants, I'm all for it. Glad to hear you are so secure hahahaha. Usually, people who see fit to say how secure they are, aren't - but I'm sure that ain't you.

I wish my "body of work" would be easily displayed hahahaha. I think that would clearly show that with very rare exceptions, I have been fairly respectful and civil even after the onslaught of other than that, and that I dutifully reply to virtually every detail of contrary posts (on that one, I give you plus points also). Furthermore, I consistently stand for the solid views of the majority in this country - what I call Good Normal Americans. While you may not be among the really hard core anti-American/anti-Christian "change mongers" (like the next guy I will be replying to), you do certainly strike me as in the naive do-gooder category that soaks up the shit put out by their side and then spews it back in a slightly more mild form.

Glad to see also that you are in favor of upholding my right - of free speech in this case. That, as I will go into more detail about in the next post replying to Dingus, is what it is all about - the fact that most on your side of the spectrum do NOT - they do their best to shut up and shut down the free speech, etc. of their opposition - most of which is just the Good Normal Americans speaking out in favor of the good normal traditional way of life in this country - which in this thread is ANTI-homosexual marriage. You don't believe what I just said? Just consider the mountain of CRAP that comes down on anybody standing up for traditional NORMALCY - calling abomination and perversion what it is and always has been.

Where were we? Oh yeah, back on the topic of the thread: I SERIOUSLY doubt the writers of the 14th Amendment - or the Founding Fathers themselves, for that matter, had homosexuals in mind hahahaha. You wouldn't even make THAT argument, would you? Just the same, their right to practice their perversion, I suppose, is protected too- even though a lot of other perversions are not - another example where "equal treatment under the law" in the eyes of some, is only equal for those they deem to be worthy of it. Oh well. The pendulum has swung way in one direction now; Who knows what a generation or two in the future will bring us. Maybe you do-gooders will decide the Sharia Law believers should have equal treatment of their beliefs too hahahaha - where would that leave the poor homosexuals - or the poor women for that matter?

As I have said repeatedly, this whole "gay marriage" topic seems insignificant to me - I'll argue it if that's the game of the week, but their really ain't much substance to it. I suppose even my beliefs have evolved - not to where I don't see homosexuality as exactly the abomination the Bible says it is, but to where I can easily overlook it and let them - most of whom, ironically, are probably good normal people in most other ways - practice their perversion in peace. Other than the old "wrath of God on the whole country" argument, it really ain't gonna make any difference to me one way or the other - yet we drag on the discussion about it hahahaha.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#309

Get down off my pedestal ... lol... all I can do it laugh.

I see you are down with the topic as there is little left for you to argue against in other than religious connotations. The framers of the Constitution and initial amendments knew one thing, that the country would evolve.. and they tried their best to frame the foundation of the country to allow it to do so. It is the beauty of it.. did they intend for it to include homosexuality to be a foundation for marriage? Probably not. But they tried their best to ensure that the government would not use it against them. Equal rights for each.

Same could be said for equality for women; something that was fought and eventually overturned. Same with race. And the country still has a ways to go in those areas in true equality.. but from a legal standpoint they are to be treated equally. This issue will slowly evolve that way.

I will agree though, in comparison to other issues facing this nation, it might not be a priority but honestly those fighting in with such rigor is the reason it is still an issue. It will be appealed again and again as they continue to fight it.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#310

Get down off my pedestal ... lol... all I can do it laugh.

I see you are down with the topic as there is little left for you to argue against in other than religious connotations. The framers of the Constitution and initial amendments knew one thing, that the country would evolve.. and they tried their best to frame the foundation of the country to allow it to do so. It is the beauty of it.. did they intend for it to include homosexuality to be a foundation for marriage? Probably not. But they tried their best to ensure that the government would not use it against them. Equal rights for each.

Same could be said for equality for women; something that was fought and eventually overturned. Same with race. And the country is still has a ways to go in those areas in true equality.. but from a legal standpoint they are to be treated equally. This issue will slowly evolve that way.

I will agree though, in comparison to other issues facing this nation, it might not be a priority but honestly those fighting in with such rigor is the reason it is still an issue. It will be appealed again and again as they continue to fight it.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

As for that pedestal, I was told you rarely see fit to express an opinion, which mostly seems accurate based on what I have seen also. That to see you rolling in the Back Alley mud with the rest of us hahahaha.

I would definitely argue that the Founding Fathers didn't have a clue - that All MEN ...... included the unequipped half of the population, much less those inverting the use of that equipment. Hell, they barely tolerated riff-raff who didn't own land, and only considered blacks 3/5 human because the South wanted more representation. Their specialty was designing a government that would protect against enemies, but not get in their way otherwise i.e. avoid change mongering hahahaha. All in all, with a little bit of fine tuning, it has worked out all right, but I would stop way short of infusing them with the foresight a lot of people think. The courts and legislatures have seen fit to decide which pigs are a little more equal than the others, but whatever.

One point you made that still needs comment , though: about those fighting with such rigor (I think you meant vigor - rigor is stiff like a dead person hahahaha), you are right EXCEPT it ain't the homosexuals themeselves trying to inflict their perversion on the general population; It's the damn non-homosexual left - about half of which are naive do-gooders like you, and the other half hard core leftist zealots, out to CHANGE America from the magnificent place it is to the dung heap they think it could be.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : QB coach Sean Mannion

Zero2Cool (2h) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington

dfosterf (5h) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport

dfosterf (5h) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft

dfosterf (5h) : So eeri

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?

beast (10h) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.

beast (10h) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.

Mucky Tundra (10h) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired

beast (13h) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.

Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal

Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.

Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh

dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!

Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer

TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over

beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22