musccy
10 years ago


I personally don't view winning the divisions as meaningless. There are certainly more important factors, but there's more to it than that. I thought it was incredibly entertaining to beat the Bears in week 17 last season to take the division crown. That wasn't meaningless to me, and brought me a good bit of enjoyment, which is all the NFL is for anyway. It's just entertainment. If I can't enjoy the top level of entertainment every year, I'd at least like to enjoy as much as possible. Plus it's fun to rub it in the Vikings, Bears, and Lions fans faces, if you will.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

yooperfan
10 years ago
It means I have a good reason to buy a new t-shirt.
DoddPower
10 years ago

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I can agree with this to an extent. It was mostly about getting in the playoffs, but it was still sweet to win the division and also prevent the Bears from getting into the playoffs or winning the division. That was amazing. At least in the short term, it was more than JUST getting into the playoffs, it was also about sticking it to a rival.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.
musccy
10 years ago


I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I don't dispute they could have been better if healthy, same is true for the looming Indiana Pacers' season, or what the Bulls went through sans Rose.

I'm just arguing about the allure of, or focus on winning a division. The main goal of the regular season is getting to the playoffs, winning the division is just one road there which isn't even a necessary road. The way the NFL is set up now you can be 3rd in your division and still win the Super Bowl, or win your division and get dominated in the playoffs (2011 Packers). The 2010 Seahawks weren't even in the top half of teams in the NFL in fact they tied for the 17th best record!
steveishere
10 years ago

That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.
musccy
10 years ago

Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 




In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Zero2Cool
10 years ago

In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.

You don't set out to build a wall. You don't say 'I'm going to build the biggest, baddest, greatest wall that's ever been built.' You don't start there. You say, 'I'm going to lay this brick as perfectly as a brick can be laid. You do that every single day. And soon you have a wall.

Will Smith wrote:



The division championship is a brick
UserPostedImage
musccy
10 years ago

I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.



The division championship is a brick

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."



Zero2Cool
10 years ago

It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."

Originally Posted by: musccy 



If that brick isn't the sturdiest of the four ... umm ... lol
UserPostedImage
voiceofreason
10 years ago
Ask most NFL coaches what their goal is at the beginning of the season and they will say to win the division. Once that goal is accomplished the super bowl is next. Yes I understand wildcards, if winning divisions are so pointless then why have them at all? Or conferences for that matter. Because it adds to the entertainment value.
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (4h) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (4h) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (4h) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (4h) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (5h) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (5h) : *years
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (5h) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (5h) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (5h) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (5h) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (5h) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (6h) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (8h) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (8h) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (9h) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
5h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20h / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.