musccy
10 years ago


I personally don't view winning the divisions as meaningless. There are certainly more important factors, but there's more to it than that. I thought it was incredibly entertaining to beat the Bears in week 17 last season to take the division crown. That wasn't meaningless to me, and brought me a good bit of enjoyment, which is all the NFL is for anyway. It's just entertainment. If I can't enjoy the top level of entertainment every year, I'd at least like to enjoy as much as possible. Plus it's fun to rub it in the Vikings, Bears, and Lions fans faces, if you will.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

yooperfan
10 years ago
It means I have a good reason to buy a new t-shirt.
DoddPower
10 years ago

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I can agree with this to an extent. It was mostly about getting in the playoffs, but it was still sweet to win the division and also prevent the Bears from getting into the playoffs or winning the division. That was amazing. At least in the short term, it was more than JUST getting into the playoffs, it was also about sticking it to a rival.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.
musccy
10 years ago


I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I don't dispute they could have been better if healthy, same is true for the looming Indiana Pacers' season, or what the Bulls went through sans Rose.

I'm just arguing about the allure of, or focus on winning a division. The main goal of the regular season is getting to the playoffs, winning the division is just one road there which isn't even a necessary road. The way the NFL is set up now you can be 3rd in your division and still win the Super Bowl, or win your division and get dominated in the playoffs (2011 Packers). The 2010 Seahawks weren't even in the top half of teams in the NFL in fact they tied for the 17th best record!
steveishere
10 years ago

That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.
musccy
10 years ago

Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 




In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Zero2Cool
10 years ago

In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.

You don't set out to build a wall. You don't say 'I'm going to build the biggest, baddest, greatest wall that's ever been built.' You don't start there. You say, 'I'm going to lay this brick as perfectly as a brick can be laid. You do that every single day. And soon you have a wall.

Will Smith wrote:



The division championship is a brick
UserPostedImage
musccy
10 years ago

I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.



The division championship is a brick

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."



Zero2Cool
10 years ago

It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."

Originally Posted by: musccy 



If that brick isn't the sturdiest of the four ... umm ... lol
UserPostedImage
voiceofreason
10 years ago
Ask most NFL coaches what their goal is at the beginning of the season and they will say to win the division. Once that goal is accomplished the super bowl is next. Yes I understand wildcards, if winning divisions are so pointless then why have them at all? Or conferences for that matter. Because it adds to the entertainment value.
blank
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (9h) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (10h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (10h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (11h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (11h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (11h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (13h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (16h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (16h) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (16h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (16h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (16h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (18h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (18h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (18h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell
    beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    53m / Around The NFL / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    4h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.