musccy
10 years ago


I personally don't view winning the divisions as meaningless. There are certainly more important factors, but there's more to it than that. I thought it was incredibly entertaining to beat the Bears in week 17 last season to take the division crown. That wasn't meaningless to me, and brought me a good bit of enjoyment, which is all the NFL is for anyway. It's just entertainment. If I can't enjoy the top level of entertainment every year, I'd at least like to enjoy as much as possible. Plus it's fun to rub it in the Vikings, Bears, and Lions fans faces, if you will.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

yooperfan
10 years ago
It means I have a good reason to buy a new t-shirt.
DoddPower
10 years ago

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I can agree with this to an extent. It was mostly about getting in the playoffs, but it was still sweet to win the division and also prevent the Bears from getting into the playoffs or winning the division. That was amazing. At least in the short term, it was more than JUST getting into the playoffs, it was also about sticking it to a rival.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.
musccy
10 years ago


I will have to disagree with this, too. I think the Packers WERE one of the better teams in the league last year, at least once Aaron Rodgers was behind center. It's hard to expect much more than squeaking by when a team's superstar quarterback misses multiple games due to injury. The Packers did just enough to get by until Rodgers came back, and then they won when it mattered most the last game of the season. The Packers win-loss record last season didn't actually reflect the talent of the team with a healthy Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, they lost in the wildcard round, but it was to arguably an even better team (certainly a healthier team), and they came very close to winning that game. The Packers may not have been a top three team last year like the 49'ers likely were, but there were certainly one of the top eight teams, imo. They might not have necessarily been one of the top eight teams during the regular season based on win-loss record alone, but going into the playoffs, I certainly think they were. They would have been ever better if they could have been a little more healthy.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I don't dispute they could have been better if healthy, same is true for the looming Indiana Pacers' season, or what the Bulls went through sans Rose.

I'm just arguing about the allure of, or focus on winning a division. The main goal of the regular season is getting to the playoffs, winning the division is just one road there which isn't even a necessary road. The way the NFL is set up now you can be 3rd in your division and still win the Super Bowl, or win your division and get dominated in the playoffs (2011 Packers). The 2010 Seahawks weren't even in the top half of teams in the NFL in fact they tied for the 17th best record!
steveishere
10 years ago

That game is one of my favorite all time reg season Packer games along with Majik vs. the Bears and "he did WHAT?!?" If you haven't seen this, I highly recommend watching it. I still get goosebumps at about 4 minutes in packers bears fan reactions .

With that said, to me the emotion had little to do with the division title...it was about the do or die nature of getting into the playoffs. As you alluded to, of course there is a progression of goals from daily improvement, to wins, leading to the playoffs, and then beyond. The improvement and wins are needed to achieve the post season goals. The division title isn't.

In principle, if you win your division, you should be one of the top 8 teams in the league, but as we saw last year, the Packers were hardly one of the top 8 regular season teams in the conference...same with Seattle when they won the West at 7-9. Winning the division title is a nice toy in the cereal box, but it really isn't a primary goal, or even necessary to achieve other yearly objectives.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.
musccy
10 years ago

Ok so how was the divison title last year not a necessary step for GB to achieve their postseason goals? It's not always necessary but it sure as hell is a lot of the time. Even without the playoff stuff it's a heck of a lot better to end the season ahead of Chi, Min, and Det than it is to end below them. That's certainly not the only thing I care about but it's not useless or meaningless either.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 




In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Zero2Cool
10 years ago

In the literal sense of course it's not useless, it can provide inferior teams like the Tebow Broncos or 2010 Seahawks opportunities to get in the playoffs.

We're (or I guess I am) nit picking minor details. The point I'm making is that although there are benefits to winning the division (playoff seeding, guaranteed spot) I see no prestige, at least no more than going in as the wild card. Looking back on a season, I'd rather be an 11-5 wild card than a 9-7 division winner because in all likelihood I'd know that as an 11-5 team, I was the better team with a better season.

The Bears won the 2010 NFC North, but...

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.

You don't set out to build a wall. You don't say 'I'm going to build the biggest, baddest, greatest wall that's ever been built.' You don't start there. You say, 'I'm going to lay this brick as perfectly as a brick can be laid. You do that every single day. And soon you have a wall.

Will Smith wrote:



The division championship is a brick
UserPostedImage
musccy
10 years ago

I think Big Willy sums my view up nicely.



The division championship is a brick

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."



Zero2Cool
10 years ago

It's possible to have a sturdy, well constructed wall without using or needing a "division brick."

Originally Posted by: musccy 



If that brick isn't the sturdiest of the four ... umm ... lol
UserPostedImage
voiceofreason
10 years ago
Ask most NFL coaches what their goal is at the beginning of the season and they will say to win the division. Once that goal is accomplished the super bowl is next. Yes I understand wildcards, if winning divisions are so pointless then why have them at all? Or conferences for that matter. Because it adds to the entertainment value.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website 😋 jk
beast (7h) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got
beast (7h) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?
Zero2Cool (7h) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers
Zero2Cool (7h) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!
Zero2Cool (9h) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders
Zero2Cool (13h) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
Zero2Cool (14h) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
Zero2Cool (14h) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
hardrocker950 (4-Nov) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Saints HC job is not an envious one; gonna be in cap hell for 3 years
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Dennis Allen has now been fired twice mid-season with Derek Carr as his starting QB
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Kuhn let go
beast (4-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers would have any interest in Z. Smith, probably not
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Shefter says Browns and Lions will figure out how to get a deal done for Za'Darius Smith..
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Packers are more likely to have 1,000 yard rusher than 4,000 yard passer
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : It's raining hard.
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : Packers inactives vs. Lions: CB Jaire Alexander S Evan Williams C Josh Myers Non-injury inactives: WR Malik Heath OL Travis Glover DE Bren
packerfanoutwest (3-Nov) : Malik Willis: My focus is helping the Packers win, not proving I can start elsewhere. But he could
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : I had Texans, but the loss of another WR flipped me
wpr (1-Nov) : I thought about taking the Jets but they've been a disaster. Losing to the Pats last week
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : Surprised more didn't pick Jets in Pick'em.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

17h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Nov / Around The NFL / wpr

1-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Nov / Around The NFL / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.